AL 26-27 Flashcards
hedge fund strategis
- lower regulatory and legal constraints
- flexibility to use shorting selling and derivatives
- a large investment universe
- aggressive investment exposures
- comparatively free use of leverage
- liquidity constraints for investors
- lack of transparency
- higher cost structure
- basic trade-off between the added fees and alpha
- lack of full underlying investment transparency attribution, higher cost allocations associated with the establishment and maintenance of the fund investment structures
- long lived investment commitment periods with limited redemption availability
- liquid alternative significantly underperform similar strategy, hedge fund benefit from liquidity premium phenomena that cannot be easily transported into a metal fund format.
HFR classification 6
- Equity hedge
- event driven
- FOF
- Macro
- Relative value
- Risk parity
HFRX index of equally weighted hedged fund (open/close to new investor)
IFFRX outperform HFRI
HFRI index series tracks only hedge fund open to new investors
Lipper classification 10
- dedicated short bia
- equity market neutral
- long/short equity hedge
- event driven
- convertible arbitage
- fixed income arbitrage
- global macro
- managed futures
9 FOF - Multi-strategy
MorningStar 3
Merger arbitrage
system futures
FOF (debt, equity, event drive, macro/systematic/ multi-strategy, and relative value)
Credit suisse 9
- convertible arbitrage
- EM
- equity market neutral
- event driven
- fixed income
- global macro
- long/short equity
- managed futures
- multi-strategy (weighted by fund size)
6 categories
- equity
- event driven
- relative value
- opportunistic (top-down)
- specialist
- multi manager
equity
invest primarily in equity/equity related instruments
long/short equity
dedicated short bias
equity market neutral EMN
-delta-gamma hedging delta=0 gamma=0
event driven
merger arbitrage
distressed securities
relative value
FI arbitrage
convertible
bond arbitrage
Opportunistic
global macro
managed futures
specialist
volatility strategies
reinsurance strategies
multi-manager
multi-strategy
FOF
long/short equity
aim to achieve avg return of long-only but with std that are 50% lower
goal: find more sources of idiosyncratic alpha
attractiveness: liquid, diverse, with market-to-market pricing driven by public market quotes
- added short-side exposure typically
- reduced beta risk and provides an additional source of potential alpha and reduced portfolio volatility
leverage usage:
variable: the more market neutral of quantitive the strategy approach, the more levered the strategy application tend to be to achieve a meaningful return profile
long the underpriced and short the overpriced ones
70-90% long
20-50% short
- stock selection defines manager skills for most L/S equity managers
- market timing ability is an additional but secondary consideration
- account for 30% hedge fund, the most prevalent
inv. characteristic: define of L/S equity manager
: strategy focus
- flexibility in holding long/short portion overtime
-use of average
strategy implementation of L/S equity
speclist L/S
- analyze fundamental situation from both top-down and bottom up analytical perspective
- sector speclizaation
Generalist L/S
avoid complex centers, take a more balanced and flexible (quant) approach
pm can readily reallocate capital more efficiently as opportunities emerges in different sectors
dedicated short selling
return goal less than other HF but with a negative correlation benefit
bottom up approach
use technique analysis, z score, m-score, swap and bond spread, and implied volatility put put options
short sell overpriced equities, only trade short-side exposure
60-120% short
characteristics:
- lower return goals but with a negative correlation benefit
- higher volatility given short beta exposure
- lower leverage : sufficient nature volatility
short-biased:
aim to create an uncorrelated or negatively correlated source of return to seeking out failing business models, fraudulent accounting, corporate mismanagement or other factors that may soar the market’s preselection of a given equity
volatility mitigator
short sell overpriced equity but may balance short exposure with some modest value-oriented or possibly index-oriented long exposure
30-60% net short
successful short-biased manager might not be characterized by increasingly positive returns as the market declines and the rf return when the market rise.
activist short selling
short the position and then publicly present their research backing the short thesis
EMN equity market neutral
useful during periods of non-trending or declining markets
goal: capture alpha while minimizing portfolio beta exposure
less volatile
implementation pair trading stab trading muti-class trading statistical arbitrage trading
take opposite position in similar equities that have divergent valuation while maintain a near net zero portfolio exposure to the market.
exp(beta)=0
risk factor ~=0
- typically must apply leverage
- constrained using highly quantitative methodologies
result in a less dynamic overall return, less volatile and steadier return,
Preferred replacement for FI during period when fi returns are unattractively low.
characteristics:
1. portfolio does not take big risk but do attempt to neutralize other risk factors
2. higher leverage is used
3. attack during period of market vulnerability and weakness
4. high levels of diversification and liquidity and a lower std of returns across normal market conditions
limited partnership are preferred vehicle
risk:
- general market could trend upward with no benefit to the portfolio
- the success of the strategy is sensitive to historical data
- the long position could decrease and the short position could increase in value
multi-class trading EMN equity market neutral
long and short different classes of shares of the same company, such as voting and nonvoting shares
- large # of security are traded and positions are adjusted on a daily/hoursly basis using algothrimm based models
statistical arbitrage trading
EMN equity market neutral
when time horizon of EMN shrinks to even shorter intervals and mean reversion and relative momentum characteristics of market behavior are emphasized
-use trading cost hurdle to determine if and when should rebalance portfolio
event driven
soft catalyst
investment made proactively in anticipation of an event that has yet to occur
hard-catalyst: investment are made in reaction to an already unnormal corp. event in which security prices has yet to fully converge
take position in corp. structure and derivatives that are attempting to profit from the outcome of M&A,bankrupcies, share issurances, buybacks, capital restitution, reorganization, and similar events
merger arbitrage
event driven
sell put buy riskless bond
cash for stock: acquiring company after target company a cash price/shre
stock for stock: to ear spread
characteristics:
1. relative liquid- with defined gains but occasional downside shocks when deals fall
2. have market sensitivity and left-tail risk, especially during the market stress periods
3. return profile is insurance like + a short put option
4. relatively high sharpe ratio with low double-digit returns and mid-single digit std
5. moderate high level of leverage use, typical 3-5 time leverage
6. has left tail risk associated with it
strategy implementation
. for stock for stock, short selling maybe difficult due to liquidity issue or other constraint
- in the case A’s credit quality is greater than that of Target’s, pM can benefit from improve quality of t by selling the CDs
distressed securities (long bias) event driven
take position insecurities of firms that are financial distress, including firms that are in bankruptcy or near bankruptcy
- long initial lock-up period
- valuation of such securities are subject to smoothing effect
liquidity: firm’s asset are sold off over time, based on the priority of their claim, debt and equity holders are paid off sequentially
senior secured debt - junior secured debt, unsecured bet, convertible debt, preferred stock, and common stock
inv. characteristics:
1. higher return but with more variability
2. long-biased
3. moderate to low level of leverage
4. high level of iliquidity
5. subject to security specific outcomes but still impacted by macro-economics
6. returns are lumpy and somewhat cyclical. it’s attractive in the econ recovery stage
high level of iniquity
reorganization
event driven
- a firm’s capital structure is re-organized
- the terms for correct claims are negotiate and revised current debt holders may agree to extend the maturity of their debt contracts or even to exchange their debt for equity shares
PM focus on how the firms’ financials will be restricted and an assessing the value of the business enterprise and the future value of different classes of claims