MAID 2.1-2.8 Flashcards
OR calculation?
(TP/FN)/(FP/TN)
At what EGFR is contrast CT probably a bad idea?
<45/30, although not absoulte
Key danger groups for ionising radiation?
Children that are likely to need high lifetime dose e.g. Crohns, and pregnancy (more due to risk of breast cancer then fetal harm; V/Q more likely to harm fetus). However, if need test then get test.
Risk with contrast MRI?
If using gadolinium-based contrast, can get NSF. Get fibrosis of skin, joints, eyes, lungs/heart/liver. Usually have ESRD.
Imaging for gallstones?
All stones will show up on US/MRCP; non-calcified will not be seen on AXR/CT. ERCP may be needed to actually clear (MRCP is not therapeutic).
Which infections may need radiological biopsy?
Thinks like discitis and osteomyelitis, as blood cultures are fairly useless and must be certain about diagnosis because antibiotics courses are prolonged
Likelihood ratio definition?
The probability of a finding in those with the disease/same probability in those without disease. 1 means exactly as likely in each.
What may interfere with analytical specificity?
Related molecules e.g. metabolites, matrix effects, heterophilic or antireagent antibodies
What are heterophilic antibodies?
Weak antibodies against poorly defined antigens; get broad reactivity and so can interfere with assays
Significance of high accuracy and low precision?
Not a systematic bias as mean is good, but total error is significant
Use of high precision and low accuracy?
Can be useful if use reference ranges/diagnostic rule out for that particular assay, but has no value between assays
Assays and tests?
For any test e.g. FBC a whole range of assays is available; precision and error are relevant to assays, sens and spec are intrinsic to a test (although relate to the assay)
Principles of spectophotometry?
Reaction must either produce or consume a substance that absorbs light at a certain wavelength; progress affects proportion which affects absorption. Used for many common tests
Pros and cons of spectophotometry?
\+ = fully automatable, fast, cheap - = affected by haemolysis/icterus/lipaemia (get interference because some breakdown products e.g. Hb have very broad absorption), not available for many analytes
Polyclonal vs monoclonal antibody diagnostics?
- Polyclonal uses mixture of antibodies, isolated from animal serum, low cost, recognise multiple epitopes. High affinity (may work even if an epitope is masked) BUT have between-batch variation.
- Monoclonal uses single Ab, isolated from single cell line. High cost, recognises SINGLE epitope. Minimal batch variability and high specificity.
Immunoassay (1): sandwich?
Used for large molecules e.g. peptides. Have capture Ab anchored to solid support; binds to analyte to fix it. Then add signal Ab with radiolabel, binds to different epitope on analyte. Wash away remainder; signal proportional to analyte concentration.
Immunassay (2): competitive?
Used for small molecules. Capture Ab on solid support; add sample Ag and labelled version; compete with each other. Signal inversely proportional to analyte.
When would you use sandwich versus competitive immunoassays?
Sandwich uses two binding sites (epitopes) per antigen; better for larger molecules e.g. proteins. Competitive only one so better for smaller.
Pros and cons of immunoassays?
\+ = often automatable, wide range of analytes, fast, can be highly sensitive. - = manual for some analytes, CROSS-REACTIVITY (binding of Ab to other epitopes) can be expensive, heterophilic antibodies in sample can interfere.
Examples of cross-reactivity in immunoassays?
Measuring cortisol; get significant cross-reactivity to some compounds e.g. corticosterone, very minor to prednisolone. Only matters in specific cases e.g. CAH, metyrapone therapy. The opposite is true in pseudo-Cushing’s
How does IHC work?
Tend to use indirect immunostaining (amplifies signal). Add primary Ab; binds to tissue Ag. Secondary Ab added; binds to constant region of primary with one ‘arm’ and to stain complex with other ‘arm’
Clinical applications of IHC?
Diagnosis of primary malignant tumours (especially when poorly differentiated), likely site of met origin, categorising malignancies, detecting molecules with prog/ther significance e.g. HER2, detection of minimal disease (small numbers of tumour cells), used alongside FNA cytology, used for semi-quantitative proliferation index
Limitations of IHC?
- Epitope masking (protein cross-linking during fixation; can reverse with heat/enzymes).
- Background staining (non-specific binding of 1/2ndary Abs, or endogenous signal enzyme)
- Ab selection/performance (select carefully, validate).
- Standardisation of IHC tests is challenging (wide range of variables)
Immunoassay microarrays?
(Mostly academic). Take sample, biotinylate, conjugate protein to Ab array, then add dye (binds it biotin). Allows many different protein to be detected and conc. determined at once.