M9, T1, unpacking Synesthesia Flashcards
Synesthesia
- There are 52 different types of synesthesia, but the most common type is grapheme-colour.
- Synesthesia involves inducer-concurrent pairings where the inducer will elicit a concurrent sensory experience in another sensory modality.
- The synesthetic inducer-concurrent experience is different to experiencing an illusion or a hallucination.
- can be developed or acquired
Developmental and acquired synesthesia
Developmental Synesthesia: not considered a disorder – more a different experience that can be beneficial. Present from around age 1, and are lifelong experiences. Considered to be automatic – involuntary evoked
Acquired Synesthesia: caused by neuropathological, neurophysiological or neurochemical damage
Nikolinakos et al 2013 colour-taste synesthesia, patient TK
- TK 72 year-old right handed male
- Colour is inducer
- Taste is concurrent
- artist, painter, print maker and art teacher
Nikolinakos et al 2013, patient TK, unidirectional synesthesia for 3 or 4 basic tastes
Green -> bitterness
Red -> sweetness
Yellow -> sourness
No colour -> saltiness
Colours not resulting in taste qualities = neutral taste
TK history of synesthesia
- TK became vividly aware of colour –tastes when he started art school in his 20s
- Prior to this no memory of synesthesia experiences
- TK painted since early childhood
- Synesthesia experiences occur when painting, looking at art and from colours in environment
- As an art teacher students thought he was being metaphorical – he was being literal
TK active experience of synesthesia
- TK uses the experience to inform artwork – is the artwork, like a good meal, balanced?
- TK’s synesthesia experiences vary with the purity, amount and intensity of the perceived hue
- Experiences taste on his tongue but it differs from the taste of food (less strong)
- No experiences when forming mental images of colours or when dreaming
Fornazzari et al 2012 multimodal synesthesia and thalamic stroke
- 45 year old male who developed acquired multimodal synesthesia 9 months after stroke
- Admitted to hospital ED with a hypertensive crisis most likely evoked by the use of cocaine
- Resulted in right hemiparesis, right hemisensory deficit, right hemianopsia, slurred speech with normal comprehension, and a transient right alien limb phenomenon. He also lost his sense of smell at the time
Fornazzari et al 2012 experiences after stroke before diagnosis
- Referred to neurology 14 months after stroke due to subjective memory complaint
- 6 months after stroke he experienced frequent déjà vu and developed petite Madeleine phenomenon triggered by visual stimuli
-> automatic involuntary evoking of a memory
-> “the sight of a ginger cookie opened a full childhood scene in his grandmothers kitchen with visual, auditory and olfactory sensations” - Sense of smell began to return
Fornazzari et al 2012, patient experience of synesthesia
- 9 months after the stroke he started having different synesthetic experiences
- Developed sound -> colour, sounds -> tactile (touch), grapheme -> taste synesthesia, and conceptual type (thinking about something can elicit experience)
-> Blue print (in advertisements) meant chicken tasted bad
-> Black print chicken OK - During 3 years of the study his experiences were consistent
Fornazzari et al 2012 patient damaged region and cognitive ability
- He could voluntarily suppress all of his synesthesic experiences
- Normal cognitive abilities (MMSE score = 30/30)
- MRI scan at 24 months after the stroke revealed a lesion left posterior part of thalamus
- The thalamus is the central relay station for the brain
- The specific area damaged in the patient is associated with communication to the posterior parietal cortex (associated with attention) and multimodal integrative areas in the brain
Why does synesthesia occur?
Cross activation hypothesis
Developmental synesthesia
Acquired synesthesia
Cross activation hypothesis (Ramachandran and Hubbard, 2001)
- There appears to be distinct neural mechanisms underlying synesthesia related to differences in connectivity relative to the neurotypical brain.
- differences in grey and white matter from synesthetes v NT
- DTI shows differences in communication between synesthetes v NT
- It has been proposed that some particular types of synesthesia might be more common than others (grapheme-colour) because neural areas associated with each are located close together in the brain
- The colour processing area of the brain (V4) is in the fusiform.
- The visual-grapheme processing area of the brain is in the fusiform, essentially next to V4
BUT - cross activation hypothesis (Ramachandran and Hubbard, 2001)
- The idea is that there could be some cross-connectivity in the brain causing synaesthesia, and because these two areas (V4 and fusiform) are so close to one another, it is more likely for this form (grapheme-colour) to occur
- However, not all types of synaesthesia can be explained by this proximity of neural areas
- Many structural and functional brain differences in synesthetes are in areas not directly implicated in the relevant sensory area of the brain for the synesthesia being studied (e.g. the intraparietal sulcus in grapheme-colour – may be involved in attention)
Developmental synesthesia and heritability
- Synesthesia is known to run in families (Jewanski et al., 2011)
- However, family members don’t necessarily show the exact same stimuli-perception pairings
- Synesthetes with lexical-gustatory synesthesia (a rare type) tend to have relatives with the more common color-based synesthesia
- Most studies of DS agree that there is a genetic basis
- While there might be a genetic predisposition, it doesn’t seem as though genetics cause synesthesia
Developmental synesthesia, conflicting research
- Baron-Cohen (1996) found that DS is more common in females than males, and it seems as though the particular trait is being passed along the X-chromosome (Bailey & Johnson, 1997).
- However, later research did not support this finding
- Furthermore, research suggests that the same genetic deformities are present for both affected and unaffected members of the same families
- Note: it is hard to localise which of many genes might be related