M4, T2, Types of dyslexia and explaining dyslexia via word recog models Flashcards
Dyslexia
Dyslexia – reading deficit/problems
Acquired Dyslexia – reading problems and deficits due to brain injury or damage
Developmental Dyslexia – failing to meet age relevant reading standards with normal intellectual functioning and educational opportunities for reading
Earliest cases of dyslexia
- Dejerine (1891) patient with dyslexia and dysgraphia, (i.e., deficit in reading and spelling/writing respectively) due to infarction in left parietal lobe
- Dejerine (1892) patient demonstrated a dissociation between reading and writing
- Patient could write well but could not read printed words aloud or for comprehension
- He could therefore not read things he had written
Types of dyslexia
Peripheral dyslexias: affect early stages in word recognition
visual analysis of letters or words
Central dyslexias : affect deeper processes
- grapheme-phoneme conversion
- orthographic input lexicon
- semantic access
Types of peripheral dyslexia
- neglect dyslexia
- pure alexia
- letter position dyslexia
- attentional dyslexia
Neglect dyslexia, Brain (1941)
- Right hemisphere damage (parietal lobe) -> unilateral neglect
- Patient does not attend to left side of space
Neglect Dyslexia – described by Brain (1941)
- Neglect dyslexia patient does not read left/right half page or word (Haywood & Coltheart, 2000)
- Not a consequence of unilateral neglect, can co-occur with unilateral neglect
- Errors for reading printed words – failure to identify part of/portion of word, page of text
Neglect dyslexia - examples
Neglect Dyslexia Left side
liquid -> squid
cage -> rage
yellow -> pillow
Neglect Dyslexia Right Side
book -> boot
milk -> mill
pen -> pet
Neglect dyslexia - defining symptoms (errors)
- Errors are spatially determined visual errors consistently in left/right side of a word -> a neglect point in visual word reading
- All letters correct on preserved side
- Letters incorrect on the neglected side
- Errors – very similar to original word in length
- reading deficit occurs due to difficulty in specification of the word at the level of visual orthographic analysis
Pure alexia
- Letter-by-Letter Reading or Alexia without Agraphia
- Writing and spelling unaffected
- Reading printed words is problematic
- Brain damage/lesion typically located inferior portions of occipital lobe bordering on temporal lobe in left hemisphere also damage to posterior portion of corpus callosum
How pure alexia presents
- Can identify letters
- Reads words aloud - say one letter at a time – defining symptom
CHAIR -> C…H…A…I…R -> “chair” - Patient names (or misname) some or all of the letters before a response is made
- If patient can name all letters, then will correctly say word
- Response times increase as word length increases (e.g., 10 seconds per letter within a word)
- Occasionally patient can name short words without spelling e.g. ball
- Role of letter confusability in pure alexia reading ability
X, J vs C, G, Q
Pure alexia and the word recog model
- Brain damage results in problem with early visual processing letter features
- Impaired visual orthographic analysis
- Word information going to reading system is noisy
Letter position dyslexia
- Primary error – letter transposition e.g., broad -> board
- Migration or transposition letters tend to be within word not initial or final letters
- Patient data Hebrew readers – lot of possible transposition words compared to English
- Correct letter identification but position coding of letters problematic
jugde vs. judge - deficit at visual orthographic analysis
Attentional dyslexia
- Person can read a single letter or a single word in isolation but cannot read the same word or letter if it is shown with items of the same type
- Between-word letter migration errors – letter in one words appears within the other word
-> Presented with WIN FED says FIN FED
-> BFXQL asked to identify centre letter, says F or Q not X - Problem with narrowing attention
- Deficit letter to word binding
Attentional dyslexia - brain stuff and particular region of word recog model
- Exact location of brain lesion unknown but patients typically have damage to posterior left-hemisphere including subcortical structures
- Difficulty with the visual specification of the word at the visual orthographic analysis level
Types of central dyslexia
- surface dyslexia
- phonological dyslexia
- direct-route dyslexia (lexical non-semantic reading)
- deep dyslexia
Surface dyslexia
- Regular words read better than irregular words
-> MINT FEAR VS PINT BEAR - Preserved regular word and nonword reading
- Many patients worse at reading nonwords than matched real words
- Errors
-> Regularisations (yacht, sew)
Surface dyslexia - impaired pathways
- intact grapheme-phoneme conversion rules
- impairment of lexical route to reading aloud
-> Orthographic Input Lexicon
-> Orthographic Input Lexicon to Semantic System
-> Orthographic Input Lexicon output to the Phonological Output Lexicon
Phonological dyslexia
- Poor or flawed nonword reading
- Problems reading new words
- Nonwords might be read as visually similar words
SOOF -> soot - OK for well known (familiar) words
- Impaired sub-lexical (non-lexical) route to reading aloud
Phonological dyslexia - impairment pathways
Impaired sub-lexical (non-lexical) route to reading aloud
-> impaired grapheme-phoneme conversion module
-> impaired access to the grapheme-phoneme conversion module
-> impaired output from the grapheme-phoneme conversion module to the phonological output buffer
Phonological dyslexia - impaired grapheme-phoneme conversion module
- Non-word reading is non-existent
- Learning to read new words is non-existent via sounding out
Phonological dyslexia - impaired (slowed) output from the grapheme-phoneme conversion module to the phonological output buffer
Some phonological dyslexics better at reading nonwords when these are pseudo-homophones (nonwords that sound like real words e.g. brane) than when they are non-words unlike a real word (e.g. frane)
Phonological dyslexia - impaired input into grapheme-phoneme conversion
- Some non-words have one-to-one mapping between letters and sounds (graphemes and phonemes) e.g. trov
- Some non-words have a letter that must be combined to form a sounds (phoneme) e.g., thoo, which is graphemic parsing
- If there is a problem (noise) in the letter information coming into the Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion module phonological dyslexics will have more problems with non-words that need graphemic parsing
Direct-route dyslexia
- also known as lexical-nonsemantic reading
- patient does not know the meaning of the word
- patient can still read printed irregular words aloud
Deep dyslexia
- First systematic study – Marshall & Newcombe (1966)
- Typically an acquired reading impairment
- Cases of developmental Deep Dyslexia in the literature
- Defining symptom semantic error in reading aloud
- Symptoms of Deep Dyslexia typically unvarying across cases
Deep dyslexia - symptoms when reading aloud
- Semantic errors
- Visual errors
- Visual-then-semantic errors
- Morphological errors
- Very poor non-word reading
- Imageability effect in reading words
- Content word reading better than function word reading
- Function word substitutions