M2- lecture 5 (guest) Flashcards
what is a trait
attributes which seem generally characteristic of an individual, usually describing the personal/internal rather than external self
ie: shy, happy, organized, talkative
what arent traits
temporary, attitudes, cognitive ability (i.e. IQ), physical attributes (tall, fat), social categories
What are the 2 important ways of measuring trait taxonomies?
PEN and the BIG 5 (oceans)
what are the 3 traits of PEN?
- Psychoticism
(testosterone levels) - Extraversion
(low psychological arousal) - Neuroticism
(fluctuations in Autonomic NS)
criticism of psychoticism dimension
questionable label accuracy… some argue it should be called antisocial personality
also relevance of sub-traits
criticisms of PEN
not all-inclusive– there are other factors
other traits show heritability, not just PEN (ie conscientiousness)
other taxonomies developed to address these issues (The Big 5 & Wiggins theory of interpersonal traits)
Who was Hans Eysenick and what was his Theoretical Approach?
he believed personal taxonomy should be rooted in biology and create a 2 dimensional (stable/unstable & introverted/extroverted) model
traits further together = more opposite, closer means similar
what is the 5-factor authentication model/the big 5?
OCEAN
openness
conscientiousness
extraversion
neuroticism
associations of the FFM
(grades, substance abuse, earnings)
conscientiousness & neuroticism
good grades -> high conscientiousness, low neuroticism
substance abuse -> low conscientiousness, high neuroticism
hgih earnings -> low neuroticism, high openness, high conscientiousness
whats missing from the big 5?
honest/humility as accounted for in HEXACO
religiosity & spiritualist typically emerge as separate
describe the plaster hypothesis and the contextualist perspective and which standpoint they take on (stable or plastic)
plaster hypothesis: personality traits are set in stone by 30
contextualist hypothesis: personality emerges from multiple sources; person-environment interactions
Mischeles Critique
on traits and predictability
knowing a person’s level on a specific trait doesn’t allow us to predict their behaviour in any specific situation
personality doesn’t predict behaviour & ppl act differently in different situations
what was the rise of social psyc?
less emphasis on personality traits and more on the situation’s effect on a person
freud, Jung, Maslow, Murray more skepticism and focused now on more doman specific things
Lewins Interactionalism
Behaviour is a function of a person and situation
Festingers Situationalism
personality = error variance, irrelevant
Emphasis of the power of the situation
situationalism
emphasized the power of the situation
- Milgrims obedience study (shock obedience)
- Asch’s conformity study: intentionally gave the wrong length online to see if ppl confirmed
- Zimbardos prison study: assigned guard or prisoner
Empiricle support for FFM
cross-cultural replication
replication with dif measures
genetic links
cross-species replication (ie chimps)
Traits of Openness
Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings, Ideas
open ppl remember dreams better,m more creative, enjoy novel experiences
agreeableness
trust
altrusim
modesty
compliance
resolve conflicts, are generous, are well-liked
neuroticism
anxiety
depression
vunerability
impulsiveness
highly emotional, mood swings and instability in relationships, are more fatigued
*result of mischeles critique
personality psyc suffered
fewer grad programs, fewer researchers & fewer jobs
social psyc blossomed
- lg area of research, grad programs, jobs, researchers… over time personality psyc made a comeback
*how personality psyc fought back
- personality traits predict behaviour over the long term!
- I like batting average rather than plans this weekend - broad traits predict broad behaviours and narrow traits predict narrow behaviours
- ppl may differ in how they behave across situations but are consistent relative to other ppl
aka Rank-order consistency! (same slope) - personality traits are stable over long periods of time
- shyness consistent from week, year, lifespan
which factors predict behavior best? (situational characteristics or eprsonality traits?
Situational Characteristics when the situation is strong with high constraint (church)
Personality traits when situation is weak with low level of constraint (ie own room, football game)
mean-level shift/change
in a population, compare the average level of a trait at different ages
find significant average shifts over time in tandem with changes (CHANGES)
Rank-Order Stability
consistency of individual differences on traits found greater rank-order stability with age
esp between 1-12 & 50-59
relative personality levels remain generally stable, and increasingly so with age (STABLE)
Change and consistency is dictated by ____ transactions
Person-evnironment
(who we are leads us to take on certain roles which shapes who wea re which leads us to…)
mean level shift findings for Extraversion
agreeableness
conscientiousness
neuroticism
extraversion
- Starts off high in childhood, but gradually decreases and stabilizes over time.
- Small gradual decline in middle adulthood
Agreeableness
- Declines in adolescence but rapidly increases from young adulthood onwards
- Agreeableness becomes especially adaptive past age 30
Conscientiousness
- Similar pattern to agreeableness with more pronounced increase in adolescence
- Adaptive for young adults starting college, entering the workforce, etc.
Neuroticism
- Generally decreases over time from young adulthood
- Gender differences early on that narrow over time
Openness
- Shows modest increase over time from adolescence, flatlines in middle adulthood
Mixed findings: other research finds an overall decrease from ~30 onwards
Personality Change in College
maturity principle: ppl increase in traits that promote optimal behavior in adult social roles & decrease in less socially desirable traits
- ^ agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness
- decrease neuroticism
*where do trait taxonomies come from?
The lexical approach says that trait taxonomies are compiled cross-cultural universally
how can we know which traits are most important?
If a trait is important it will have Synonym Frequency (there will be many words for it)
*what is a trait taxonomy?
a hierarchical systematic way of organizing traits with the most important/basic at the top
Lexucal approach to studying pride
Step 1: Research procedure (have ppl list assiciated traits with pride)
2: figure out how the words group together
Statistical/Experimental Approach to studyin Pride
statistical analysis (clusters, etc)
step 1: have ppl rate the extent to which the trait describes them (1-5 scale)
2: enter data into the factor analysis program to see which traits “hold together” in people’s experiences
Theoretical approach to trait taxonomy
Think about how many traits should matter, based on some pre-articulated theory
Two Facet Theory
Authentic pride
– Promotes social investments – Fosters genuine self-esteem
- Hubristic pride
– Arrogance, egotism – Fosters narcissism
iffindingsfromconceptualstudyand factor analysis study converge with theoretical perspective, then we’ve probably found the structure of pride
is the replicibility crisis occuring in social or personality psyc?
social psyc and its demonstrating the poser of the situation
what does this mean for personality psyc?
It is equipped with the resources to heal with this, so it is on the rise again
what are the 3 basic assumptions of personality traits (bio)
– Reflect physiological differences between people
– Are largely genetically determined
– Are rooted in our evolutionary history
what is Phrenology and what is the modern view?
a pre-scientific approach to personality where regions of the head were associated with different traits (ie courage)
Modern view:
1) it’si nthebrain ,not the
head
2) it’s not that specific
What were Galens 4 humors?
yellow bile
black bile
phlem
blood
if one fluid was dominant, that would be the personality observed
now we know its neurotransmitters and hormones
modern approach:
genes as the building blocks of personality
- inherited evolutionarily
- shape personality and behaviour thru physiological reactions
modern approach: behavioral Genes
the study of how genes shape behavior
are behaviors (ie eprsonality) shaped by nature or nurture?
BOTH- gene & environment
Basic approaches (define)
Gene-envrionment interactionalism
Genetic determination
gene-environment: If gene and a particular environment, then a particular phenotype
Genetic determination: If gene then a particular phenotype (ie huntingtons)
Genotype vs phenotype
genotype = potentialities
phenotype= what we see
define heritibility; what is it not?
Heritability: is the extent to which individual differences in a trait, within a group of people, are due to differences in genes
only in groups and on differing genes
is NOT how much of a trait in a person is dep on genes
how does environment contribute to IQ?
it s a misconception that races are genetically different in IQ. Its actually the opportunities and environments
i.e. overachievers don’t have to go as high in a low-achieving school where they’re already the best as high achievers in a well-funded school
what is the methodoligy for anylizing differences in identical (MZ), DZ and MZ raised apart stins and which is best?
Twin Studies: compare concordance (similarity) of trait in MZ vs. DZ twins
– If MZ twins are more similar than DZ twins, that means trait is partly heritable
* Adoption Studies: compare concordance of trait between parents and biological vs. adopted kids
– If bio kids are more similar to parents than adoptive kids, trait is partly heritable
* MZ Twins Raised Apart
– Best Design: Simply look at the concordance of
the trait -> that’s its heritabilityw
what are some problems with behavior genetics methods
Math requires that DZ and MZ twins, and adoptive kids and bio kids, have same amount of shared environment
* Twin Studies
– Equal Environments Assumption
more so for MZ than DZ
Adoption Studies
– Representativeness (
– Selective placement (with similar parents)
what are the 3 important influences on personality (genes)
Geneticinfluences:Genesindividualsinherit from their parents
* Shared Environment: Environmental effects shared by family members (parenting style, family environment, schools, neighborhood, material resources)
* Non-sharedEnvironment:Environmentaleffects unique to the individual – NOT shared by family members (illnesses, friends, teachers, being treated differently by your parents)