Lombos - Statements Flashcards
419) Admissions- An _______ is anything the suspect says that tend to prove guilt by tying the suspect in any way to the crime.
admission
420) Miranda- It is important to understand that _________ custody and “interrogation” must co-exist at the same time before ______ advisements are required.
both
Miranda
421) Neither _____ right (silence or counsel) can be asserted “________,” i.e., before both “custody” and “interrogation” exist.
Miranda
anticipatorily
422) “Custody” exists for Miranda purposes when two requirements are met:
- the suspect must have been formally arrested or had his ____________ restrained to a degree associated with a formal arrest and the suspect must personally be aware of this lack of freedom or reasonably believe that it exists
freedom
423) Further, whether the interrogation takes place at a police _________ makes a crucial difference in the determination of “custody.” _______ to leave is the key consideration at a police station.
station
Free
424) Suspect’s Age- the U.S. Supreme Court parted company from precedent and ruled that a juvenile’s age at the time of questioning must be considered in determining if the juvenile was in ______ for the purposes of Miranda warnings. With _____, a juvenile’s age must be taken into account when determining if ______ warnings must be administered prior to questioning if “the child’s age was known to the officer at the time of the interview, or would have been objectively apparent to any reasonable officer.”
custody
J.D.B.
Miranda
425) “Interrogation” is:
- any direct or “express” questioning about the crime being ________; or
- the “functional equivalent” of direct questioning, accomplished through words or actions that “are reasonably likely to elicit an ________ response.”
investigated
incriminating
426) Waiver of Miranda rights- The waiver may be either “_____” or “implied.”
express
427) Waiver Must Be Voluntary, Knowing and ______
Intelligent
428) Invocation of Miranda Rights -A suspect (who is in “custody” and is being, or is about to be, “interrogated”) may invoke his right to silence or his Miranda right to counsel at any time before or during an interview. Once he invokes either of these rights, the invocation must be “scrupulously honored,” meaning that “the ________ must cease.”
interrogation
429) ______ rights are personal to the suspect and may not be vicariously asserted or invoked by anyone other than the suspect, such as a parent or attorney. In other words, only the suspect may assert his right to silence or an attorney under Miranda and, even then, only if he is in “custody” and being, or about to be, “interrogated.”
Miranda
430) The “bottom line” now must be: do not intentionally violate Miranda, in particular, do not ignore an invocation of the right to silence or counsel. This is because an intentional violation will virtually guarantee a civil rights suit against you and your department–with possible personal ______.
liability
431) If a suspect has waived his Miranda rights and given a statement, you are entitled to go back to him later and try to get additional information, even though he remains in “custody.” Although each case will be decided on its own facts, you are likely safe that any subsequent questioning within at least __ hours after the initial questioning will be considered “reasonably contemporaneous” and not require a re-advisement.
24
432) Once a suspect who is in custody has clearly asserted his Miranda right to _____, all interrogation must cease. As long as the suspect remains in custody, you may not “try again” without defense counsel being present. Further contact may be made in only two circumstances. It is permissible if the suspect initiates the contact. Further contact may also be permissible if it follows at least a ________ day break in “interrogative custody” as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court
counsel
14
433) If a suspect invokes his right to remain silent, as opposed to his right to counsel, there is no ________ prohibition against coming back and “trying again.” A second try has been approved where: (1) there is a re-advisement of rights and a valid waiver; (2) “substantial” time (a few hours or days) has passed since the original invocation; and 3) the questioning concerns either a different or “other” crime.
Absolute