Literature Review Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of Literature review

A

aims to review the critical points of current knowledge on a particular topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reviews can be viewed from:

A
  1. published journal articles
  2. unpublished journal articles
  3. audio visuals e.g podcasts
  4. personal communication e.g (meeting with experts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

types of good Literature

A
  1. a critical evaluation
  2. has clarity and concise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

types of bad literature

A
  1. narrow and shallow
  2. confusing and longwinded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Importance of literature review

A
  1. to understand a subject matter better
  2. to learn what one knows and what does not
  3. to identify and highlight significant variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of literature review

A
  1. Simple- to gain overview of a topic
  2. Applied- they are used in business, professional, and government.
  3. Academic- for a stand alone product about a specific topic. (does not include features or functionality of the product)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Components of Literature Review

A
  1. Problem formulation- what topic is being examined?
  2. Literature search- finding materials relevant to the topic
  3. Data evaluation- determining which literature makes significant contributions
  4. Analysis and interpretation- discussing the findings and the conclusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does an article should be read?

A
  1. Read the abstract or summary first
  2. Take notes from important points from the abstract: The problem statement and Objectives.
  3. Procedures
  4. Findings
  5. Conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common errors in Literature Review

A
  1. Review is not logically organised
  2. Too few references and reference used are outdated
  3. Review does not argue a point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly