Literature lecture 3 Flashcards
What is policy transfer?
The process of using knowledge about policies, administrative arrangements, and institutions from one context to inform decisions and developments in another. This can be bogh voluntarily (choices of plolitical actors), and coercively (government/institution pushes another to adopt policy)
How has policy tranfer evolved?
It started as part of studying how politics and policies vary between places, with early research looking at how ideas spread. Later, the focus changed to figuring out what gets transferred and how.
what are the six main categories of actors involved in policy transfer
- elected officials
- political parties
- bureaucrats/civil servants
- pressure groups
- entrepreneurs/experts: promote lessons, build networks that sever as sources for new ideas.
- supra-national institutions: facilitate exchange between countries. encourage comparisons among member states. focus mainly on voluntary transfer.
what are some motivations behind voluntary policy transfer?
dissatisfaction with existing policies, perceived policy failures, election cycles, and undertainty about the causes or effects of previous decisions.
what are the three categories of policy transfer based on motivations?
- voluntary transfer: catalyst is dissatisfaction. this can arise from policy failure, elections. so uncertainty on previous decisions can promt actors to seek policies from elsewhere.
- direct coercive transfer: when one government forces another to adopt a policy (rare).
- indirect coercive transfer: can result from externalities such as interdependence or technological advancements, push governments to adopt similar policies. economic pressure, global economic integration and perception of falling behind neigbors can idirectly influence policy transfer.
What objects of transfer are identified in policy transfer?
policy goals, structure, and content; policy instruments or administrative techniques; institutions; ideology; ideas, attitudes, and concepts; and negative lessons
what are some constraints that affect the feasibility and success of policy transfer?
complexity of the policy program, past policies shaping transfer possibilities, institutional and structural constraints, ideological factors, and economic and technological considerations.
What is emphasized regarding the role of subjective perception in policy transfer?
Policy making is affected by personal views and decisions, so it’s important to understand how these views impact the transfer of policies.
what is criticized about the literature on policy transfer?
It is often too positive and often relies too much on facts and ignores how people see problems and solutions, so we need to study this aspect more.
what are some examples of supra-national organizations involved in policy transfer?
European community, OECD, World Bank, and United Nations agencies.
What is suggested about the production and use of best practices in policymaking processes?
little is known about how best practices are actually produced and used, raising questions about their effectiveness in influencing policy change and improving spatial planning outcomes.
what challenges the assumption of the universitality and effectiveness of best practices in spatial planning?
significant diversity among European member states in governance, administrative cultures, and professional capacities, which calls into question the transferability of best practices, especially between dissimilar countries.
What factors influence the complexity of policy processes?
Politicians see policy transfer as an easy fix, wanting to avoid the time and money needed for original planning. But it’s tough to share all the details about what makes a policy work
What components of best practices are more/less easily transferable?
Methods and techniques are more easily transferable, while ideas and principles are less so due to their contextual nature
How can the process of policy transfer be initiated, and which approach is often more effective?
Policy transfer can be initiated either top-down by promoters or bottom-up by recipients, with the latter often being more effective.