LIT 7 - Seibel Flashcards
Seibel: What are some general categories of factors that can contribute to structural collapse?
Structural collapses can arise from a complex interplay of factors, broadly categorized as:
1. Design and Construction Errors: Faulty design calculations, inadequate materials, or errors during construction.
2. Inadequate Maintenance: Neglecting upkeep and repairs can weaken a structure over time.
3. External Factors and Overloading: Exceeding design load limits can lead to collapse.
4. Communication and Oversight Failures: Lack of clear communication and insufficient inspections can contribute to disasters.
Seibel: What role can ‘public mismanagement’ play in structural failures?
Public mismanagement can significantly increase the risk of structural failures through:
1. Lack of Due Diligence: Failing to conduct thorough inspections and ensure compliance with safety standards.
2. Ignoring Warnings and Expert Advice: Disregarding safety concerns can have severe consequences.
3. Prioritising Cost Savings Over Safety: Minimising maintenance costs can compromise safety.
4. Unclear Responsibilities and Lack of Accountability: Undefined roles can lead to negligence.
5. Politicisation and Bureaucratic Inertia: Political considerations can hinder timely decision-making.
Seibel: What does the text suggest about the importance of proper documentation in construction and maintenance?
Proper documentation is crucial for:
1. Original Construction: Detailed records are essential for understanding structural integrity.
2. Maintenance and Inspections: Records of maintenance work are vital for tracking structure condition.
3. Accountability and Liability: Documentation is critical for determining causes of collapse and establishing responsibility.
Seibel: How can the failure to adequately consider or act upon expert opinions contribute to structural failures?
Disregarding expert opinions can increase the risk of structural collapse through:
1. Missed Identification of Risks: Experts can identify potential weaknesses that may not be apparent to non-experts.
2. Inadequate Scope of Investigations: Limiting investigations can overlook critical issues.
3. Delayed or Ineffective Remedial Action: Failing to implement recommendations can leave structures vulnerable.
Seibel: What are some examples of how communication breakdowns or a lack of information sharing can contribute to public mismanagement and potential structural failures?
Effective communication is crucial for preventing disasters:
1. Failure to Disseminate Warnings: Ignoring potential risks can prevent necessary actions.
2. Lack of Coordination Between Departments or Agencies: Poor communication can hinder effective oversight.
3. Insufficient Transparency: Lack of openness can erode public trust.
4. Misinterpretation or Downplaying of Risks: Downplaying risks can lead to inaction.
