Lesson 8: Developing Corporate Strategies Flashcards
What is the corporate task of the corporate center?
Formulating and communicating the overall mission, vision, goals, strategies and values of the corporation.
Approval and control of strategic and financial goals.
Procure and allocate resources (capital, people)
Develop and allocate the corporation’s core competences
Development of stakeholder relations and stakeholder communcation
What is value creation at the corporate level?
Create economies of scale in corporate functions: finance, accounting, HRM, IT, marking, communications
Develop core competences in corporate functions through specialisation and critical mass
Negotiate, balancing and eliminating risk
Consulting and training in the area of management
Facilitate innovation
Connect SBU’s with stakeholder relations
Value adding activities corporate parent?
1) Envisioning = clear strategic intent = common purpose
2) Facilitating synergies
3) Coaching: coorporation, build relationships
4) Provide central services and resources
5) Intervening
Challenge and develop strategic ambitions business units
Value destruction at the corporate level?
Delaying decision-making processes through bureaucratic behaviour
Subsidiary companies become part of the power play (political game) between top manager at the corporate center.
Resources are not allocated optimal according to market possibilities and future profit potential
Losses in one subsidiary are covered by the other subsidiaries.
What are the types of corporate roles?
1) Portfolio manager:
Corporate office: small, main emphasis: downward, investing and intervening
2) Synergy manager:
Corporate office: medium
Main emphasis: across, facilitating cooperation
3) Parental developer
Corporate office: large
Main emphasis: downward, providing parental capabilities
4) Restructering manager
Turn around specialist, value creation
What are portfolio managers?
Agent for financial markets
Identifying and acquiring undervalued assets
Divesting low-performing SBUs quickly and good performers at a premium
Autonomous SBU’s, small, low cost corporate staf, incentives based on SBY result
Many independent companies controlled at their bottom line.
Eg. Conglomerates: popular in ‘60 and 70s
Agent acts on behalf of shareholders/financial markets.
Conglomerate strategy: not closely involved in routine management of businesses
Eg. Private equity Blackstone
What is the restructuring manager?
Value creation at the SBU level: limited role to create SBU ‘finesse’
Identifies restructuering opportunities. Intervention in SBU to transform performance. Sale of SBU when restructuring complete or unfeasible or market conditions favourable.
Autonomous SBUs, small specialist corporate centre, turnround skills of corporate staff, incentives based on acquired SBU results
Vertical coordination when time limited
What is the synergy manager
Corporate parent seeking to enhance value for business units by managing synergies across business units –> common purpose, good if close to core business.
Challenges:
1) Excessive costs: benefits > financial and opportunity costs
2) Overcoming self-interest: managers unwilling to work for common good
3) Illusory synergies: easy to overestimate –> eg. In acquisitions
Sharing activities/resources or transferring skills/competences to enhance competitive advantage of SBU’s
Identification of appropriate bases for sharing or transferring
Identification of benefits which outweigh costs
Collaborative SBs, corporate staff as integrators, overcoming SBU resistance to sharing or transferring, incentives affected by corporate results.
What is the parental developer?
Empoy its own central capabilities to add value to its businesses.
Challenges:
1) Parental focus: focused to identify –> value adding capabilities
2) Crown jewel problem:
Parents add little value = divest and buy where parent can add value
Vertical coordination between SBU and corporate center;
Central competences can be used to create value in SBUs
SBUs no fulfilling their potential (a parenting opportunity)
The centre has clear and relevant resources or capabilities to enhance SBU potential
What are the different models for portfolio management?
1) Boston Consulting Group: BCG model
Optimising cash flow and consolidation
2) Market attractiveness model:
Optimising growth
3) Parenting matrix model:
Optimising the managerial fit between the corporate centre and the SBU, focus on competences
What is the BCG model?
Boston Consulting Group matrix: uses market share and market growth criteria for determining attractiveness and balance of a business portfolio
1) Star = high market share in a growing market –> we need to spend to keep up with growth, but sufficient profits to be self sufficient
2) Question mark = problem child
Growing market but no high market share yet –> stars = heavy investment required. Many fail, nurture several at time
3) Cash cow = high market share in mature market, growth is low, profitable. Cash generator here –> question marks
4) Dogs = low share in static or declining markets = cash drain = divestment or closure@
What is the idea behind the BCG model?
Balancing the product/market
Focus on cashflow and return on investment
Acquisition and sale of SBU’s
Development of termination of SBU’s
Presume independency between business areas
What are the dimensions of assumptions of the BCG model?
High market shares lead to sales and reduce unit cost
High market growth reduce competition and increase the remaining life time of the investment
What are the theories behind the BCG model?
1) The product life cycle model
The market is most attractive during growth, growing markets have a need for investment.
Mature and declining markets do not need investments.
2) The experience curve
When we repeat an activity, the cost of doing so decreases because we learn, the unit cost will fall over time as a result = leads to a cash cow.
What are the problems with the BCG model?
Difficult to determine what the market share really is, dpeends on how we define the market
How can we motivate managers and people working in a cash cow?
The model assumes independency between strategic business units in order to invest or determine a SBU
Undermine the idea of synergies across the SBUs