Lesson 7 Flashcards
What are three potential “determiners of meaning” in the act of communication.
Text, Author, Reader
In modern American culture, which of these elements of communication is favored as the determiner of meaning?
Reader
What are some objections to the author is the determiner of meaning?
To seek the authors intended meaning makes the document irrelevant for modern readers.
We can never access the readers thoughts, so the authorial meaning of the text is inaccessible to us.
To delimit the meaning to the conscious intent of the human author is to deny the divine authorship of Scripture.
What is the definition of ‘implication’?
Those sub-meanings of a text that legitimately fall within the paradigm or principle willed by the author, whether he was aware of them or not.
The definition for ‘significance’ is.
How the reader responds to the willed meaning of the author.
In the textbook, Plummer uses the biblical text to illustrate a point: “ the Lord abhors dishonest scales, but accurate weight are his delight,” From where is Plummer quoting?
Proverbs 11:1
Which approach does Plummer “think” is the “best way to explain Matthew’s use of Isaiah 7:14?”
The typological approach is likely the best way to explain Matthew’s use of Isaiah 7:14.
Which are some of the attributes of the Holy Spirit.
Third person of the Trinity, Indwells true followers of Christ, Empowers God’s people with spiritual gifts for edifying the church.
Plummer discusses evangelical scholars who deny or redefine the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit. Such persons claim :
The Spirit does not aid in helping the believer to better understand a passage, but only gives the believer a desire to obey.
The fact that nonbelievers can understand portions the Bible does not:
Deny the illuminating work of the Spirit.
Briefly describe this interpretive approach: The reader as determiner of meaning
In this approach the reader is the ultimate determiner of meaning - not the author or text. Very subjective approach to interpretation. Results in many contradictory readings.
Briefly describe this interpretive approach: the author as determiner of meaning.
The reader is seeking to determine the conscious intent of the human author.
Give a significant criticism of this approach: The text as interpreter of meaning.
Meaning is a construction of thought. Texts can convey meaning, but they cannot construct meaning.
Give on objection to author as determiner of meaning?
We can never know the authors thoughts, so how can we know his meaning.
Briefly explain the difference between ‘meaning’ and ‘implication’.
Meaning is the conscious intent of the author. Implications are those “sub-meanings” which legitimately flow within the author’s channel of meaning, though the author may or may not have been aware of them.