Lesson 7 Flashcards

1
Q

What are three potential “determiners of meaning” in the act of communication.

A

Text, Author, Reader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In modern American culture, which of these elements of communication is favored as the determiner of meaning?

A

Reader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some objections to the author is the determiner of meaning?

A

To seek the authors intended meaning makes the document irrelevant for modern readers.
We can never access the readers thoughts, so the authorial meaning of the text is inaccessible to us.
To delimit the meaning to the conscious intent of the human author is to deny the divine authorship of Scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of ‘implication’?

A

Those sub-meanings of a text that legitimately fall within the paradigm or principle willed by the author, whether he was aware of them or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The definition for ‘significance’ is.

A

How the reader responds to the willed meaning of the author.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In the textbook, Plummer uses the biblical text to illustrate a point: “ the Lord abhors dishonest scales, but accurate weight are his delight,” From where is Plummer quoting?

A

Proverbs 11:1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which approach does Plummer “think” is the “best way to explain Matthew’s use of Isaiah 7:14?”

A

The typological approach is likely the best way to explain Matthew’s use of Isaiah 7:14.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which are some of the attributes of the Holy Spirit.

A

Third person of the Trinity, Indwells true followers of Christ, Empowers God’s people with spiritual gifts for edifying the church.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Plummer discusses evangelical scholars who deny or redefine the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit. Such persons claim :

A

The Spirit does not aid in helping the believer to better understand a passage, but only gives the believer a desire to obey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The fact that nonbelievers can understand portions the Bible does not:

A

Deny the illuminating work of the Spirit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Briefly describe this interpretive approach: The reader as determiner of meaning

A

In this approach the reader is the ultimate determiner of meaning - not the author or text. Very subjective approach to interpretation. Results in many contradictory readings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Briefly describe this interpretive approach: the author as determiner of meaning.

A

The reader is seeking to determine the conscious intent of the human author.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give a significant criticism of this approach: The text as interpreter of meaning.

A

Meaning is a construction of thought. Texts can convey meaning, but they cannot construct meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give on objection to author as determiner of meaning?

A

We can never know the authors thoughts, so how can we know his meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Briefly explain the difference between ‘meaning’ and ‘implication’.

A

Meaning is the conscious intent of the author. Implications are those “sub-meanings” which legitimately flow within the author’s channel of meaning, though the author may or may not have been aware of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Briefly explain the difference between ‘implication’ and ‘significance’.

A

Implications are those “sub-meanings” which legitimately flow within the author’s original consciously intended meaning. Significance is the reader’s response to the implications.

17
Q

Briefly explain what typology is?

A

Typology is an approach to biblical history that sees God progressively intervening in repeated and climactic ways until the goal of his saving intervention arrives in Christ. Typological interpretation is where Biblical authors point out these patterns.

18
Q

List three facts of the Holy Spirit mentioned in the book.

A

That He is the third person of the trinity. That he inspired the various authors of the bible. He was sent by the Father to indwell the all true believers. He enables believers to understand, believe, and obey the Scriptures.

19
Q

Briefly describe what the “Illumination” of the Holy Spirit is.

A

Illumination is the Christian doctrine that God, through His Holy Spirit, enables us his people to understand His Word.

20
Q

If Plummers view of Illumination is correct, what are few practical implications for studying the Bible?

A

One should approach the Bible in prayerful humility, seeking the Spirit’s assistance to understand the text. One should also be aware that one’s fallen, natural inclination will be to distort and misunderstand the Bible.

21
Q

Choose a passage of Scripture from the Bible and interpret is from the perspective of the reader as determiner of meaning, the text as determiner of meaning, and the author as determiner of meaning. Compare and contrast these answers and explain the pros and cons of each.

A

____________________________________________________

22
Q

Choose a passage of Scripture (a passage from the O.T. quoted in the New) and explain how to interpret them typologically.

A

_____________________________________________________