Lesson 5- Explanations of attachments- Learning theories Flashcards

1
Q

What is the learning/behavioural theory & what does it state?

A

Learning theory (behavioural theory)- proposes all πŸƒβ€β™‚β€ is learned via experiences βœ–οΈ inborn/innate
- Behaviourists believe all πŸƒβ€β™‚β€(including attachment) learned through classical or operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the cupboard love theory?

A

Cupboard Love Theory- learning theory called this because implies that attachment only occurs because caregiver provides 🍎/πŸ₯› … suggests attachment superficial (like how 🐈 🐱 superficially loves cupboard due to food 🍎 it holds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is classical conditioning?

A

Learning through association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who investigated classical conditioning and how did they do so?

A

Pavlov with his experiment on dogs salivating at the sound of a bell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State Pavlov’s association process

A

BEFORE CC- Food🍎 (UCS) = Salivation = (UCR)
BEFORE CC- πŸ”” = NS = no response
DURING CC- 🍎 (UCS) + πŸ”” (NS) = Salivation (UCR)
AFTER CC- πŸ”” (CS) = Salivation (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State the meaning of UCS, UCR, NS, CS & CR

A
UCS = Unconditioned stimulus
UCR = Unconditioned response
NS = Neutral stimulus
CS = Conditioned stimulus 
CR = Conditioned response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do the same principles of associating the sound of the bell to salivation lead to associating the mother with a sense of relief or pleasure?

A

BEFORE CC- MilkπŸ₯› (UCS) = Relief/Pleasure = (UCR)
BEFORE CC- Mother 🀰 = NS = no response
DURING CC-πŸ₯› (UCS) + 🀰 (NS) = Relief/Pleasure (UCR)
AFTER CC-🀰 (CS) = Relief/Pleasure (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Therefore what does the argument of classical conditioning as an explanation of attachment imply?

A
  • The response of relief/pleasure to πŸ₯› is automatic & βœ–οΈ need to be learnt
  • … reason why πŸ‘Ά becomes attached to caregiver is because associates caregiver with pleasure (🍎/πŸ₯› satisfying hunger)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is operant conditioning?

A

Learning through rewards (reinforcement βž• or βž–) & punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the primary reinforcer in terms of attachment?

A

Primary βž• reinforcement- natural reward e.g. 🍎 & πŸ’§ satisfying hunger & thirst)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the secondary reinforcer in terms of attachment?

A

Secondary βž• reinforcement- e.g. πŸ’΅/stickers- encourages/allows you to fulfil primary reinforcement needs
- mother 🀰

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is positive reinforcement?

A

βž• reinforcement- gaining pleasure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is negative reinforcement?

A

βž– reinforcement- the removal of discomfort/displeasure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the repetition of behaviour differ from whether behaviour leads to reward or punishment?

A

Behaviours-> reward- repeated

Behaviours-> punishment- ⬇️ likely to be repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Therefore what does the argument of operant conditioning as an explanation of attachment imply?

A
  • … πŸ₯›/🍎 = primary reinforcer- provides βž• reinforcement (pleasure) & βž– reinforcement (takes away hunger)
  • Person who supplies πŸ₯›/🍎 associated with pleasure & removal of discomfort … becomes secondary reinforcer & source of reward in his/her own right
  • … attachment occurs because πŸ‘Ά seeks person who can supply reward-> mother/caregiver = secondary reinforcement figure- help πŸ‘Ά receive primary reinforcement (πŸ₯›)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the evaluation points for the learning theory as an explanation of attachments?

A

πŸ‘Ž- Attachment βœ–οΈ based on 🍎- human & animal research shows attachment βœ–οΈ to do with feeding baby e.g. Lorenz’s study (imprinting with Lorenz BUT βœ–οΈ feed baby goslings), Harlow’s research (baby 🐡 most attached to cloth πŸ’ even though wire πŸ’ provided πŸ₯›), Schaffer & Emerson’s study (human babies βœ–οΈ always form primary attachments with person who fed them the most)
πŸ‘- elements of conditioning involved in attachments - although βœ–οΈ complete explanation of attachments- one reason (food) explained … why most babies form attachments with caregivers who feed them the most (e.g. breastfeeding 🀱 mothers 🀰)
πŸ‘Ž- Learning Theory based on animal studies- e.g. Skinner used πŸ€ & Pavlov used 🐢 πŸ• Behaviourists believe humans βœ–οΈ different from animals in terms of learning … believe legitimate to generalise from animals to humans BUT argued attachments complex πŸƒβ€β™‚β€ … βœ–οΈ explained by conditioning- argued innate
πŸ‘- Development of learning theory (Social Learning Theory)- modelling (imitating πŸƒβ€β™‚β€ of role models) used to explain attachment πŸƒβ€β™‚β€- πŸ‘Ά observe their parents’ affectionate πŸƒβ€β™‚β€ & imitate this- ALSO- parents deliberately instruct πŸ‘Ά about how to behave in relationships (by rewarding appropriate attachment πŸƒβ€β™‚β€- kisses 😘 & hugs πŸ€—