Lesson 5- Explanations of attachments- Learning theories Flashcards

1
Q

What is the learning/behavioural theory & what does it state?

A

Learning theory (behavioural theory)- proposes all ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€ is learned via experiences โœ–๏ธ inborn/innate
- Behaviourists believe all ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€(including attachment) learned through classical or operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the cupboard love theory?

A

Cupboard Love Theory- learning theory called this because implies that attachment only occurs because caregiver provides ๐ŸŽ/๐Ÿฅ› โ€ฆ suggests attachment superficial (like how ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿฑ superficially loves cupboard due to food ๐ŸŽ it holds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is classical conditioning?

A

Learning through association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who investigated classical conditioning and how did they do so?

A

Pavlov with his experiment on dogs salivating at the sound of a bell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State Pavlovโ€™s association process

A

BEFORE CC- Food๐ŸŽ (UCS) = Salivation = (UCR)
BEFORE CC- ๐Ÿ”” = NS = no response
DURING CC- ๐ŸŽ (UCS) + ๐Ÿ”” (NS) = Salivation (UCR)
AFTER CC- ๐Ÿ”” (CS) = Salivation (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State the meaning of UCS, UCR, NS, CS & CR

A
UCS = Unconditioned stimulus
UCR = Unconditioned response
NS = Neutral stimulus
CS = Conditioned stimulus 
CR = Conditioned response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do the same principles of associating the sound of the bell to salivation lead to associating the mother with a sense of relief or pleasure?

A

BEFORE CC- Milk๐Ÿฅ› (UCS) = Relief/Pleasure = (UCR)
BEFORE CC- Mother ๐Ÿคฐ = NS = no response
DURING CC-๐Ÿฅ› (UCS) + ๐Ÿคฐ (NS) = Relief/Pleasure (UCR)
AFTER CC-๐Ÿคฐ (CS) = Relief/Pleasure (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Therefore what does the argument of classical conditioning as an explanation of attachment imply?

A
  • The response of relief/pleasure to ๐Ÿฅ› is automatic & โœ–๏ธ need to be learnt
  • โ€ฆ reason why ๐Ÿ‘ถ becomes attached to caregiver is because associates caregiver with pleasure (๐ŸŽ/๐Ÿฅ› satisfying hunger)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is operant conditioning?

A

Learning through rewards (reinforcement โž• or โž–) & punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the primary reinforcer in terms of attachment?

A

Primary โž• reinforcement- natural reward e.g. ๐ŸŽ & ๐Ÿ’ง satisfying hunger & thirst)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the secondary reinforcer in terms of attachment?

A

Secondary โž• reinforcement- e.g. ๐Ÿ’ต/stickers- encourages/allows you to fulfil primary reinforcement needs
- mother ๐Ÿคฐ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is positive reinforcement?

A

โž• reinforcement- gaining pleasure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is negative reinforcement?

A

โž– reinforcement- the removal of discomfort/displeasure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the repetition of behaviour differ from whether behaviour leads to reward or punishment?

A

Behaviours-> reward- repeated

Behaviours-> punishment- โฌ‡๏ธ likely to be repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Therefore what does the argument of operant conditioning as an explanation of attachment imply?

A
  • โ€ฆ ๐Ÿฅ›/๐ŸŽ = primary reinforcer- provides โž• reinforcement (pleasure) & โž– reinforcement (takes away hunger)
  • Person who supplies ๐Ÿฅ›/๐ŸŽ associated with pleasure & removal of discomfort โ€ฆ becomes secondary reinforcer & source of reward in his/her own right
  • โ€ฆ attachment occurs because ๐Ÿ‘ถ seeks person who can supply reward-> mother/caregiver = secondary reinforcement figure- help ๐Ÿ‘ถ receive primary reinforcement (๐Ÿฅ›)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the evaluation points for the learning theory as an explanation of attachments?

A

๐Ÿ‘Ž- Attachment โœ–๏ธ based on ๐ŸŽ- human & animal research shows attachment โœ–๏ธ to do with feeding baby e.g. Lorenzโ€™s study (imprinting with Lorenz BUT โœ–๏ธ feed baby goslings), Harlowโ€™s research (baby ๐Ÿต most attached to cloth ๐Ÿ’ even though wire ๐Ÿ’ provided ๐Ÿฅ›), Schaffer & Emersonโ€™s study (human babies โœ–๏ธ always form primary attachments with person who fed them the most)
๐Ÿ‘- elements of conditioning involved in attachments - although โœ–๏ธ complete explanation of attachments- one reason (food) explained โ€ฆ why most babies form attachments with caregivers who feed them the most (e.g. breastfeeding ๐Ÿคฑ mothers ๐Ÿคฐ)
๐Ÿ‘Ž- Learning Theory based on animal studies- e.g. Skinner used ๐Ÿ€ & Pavlov used ๐Ÿถ ๐Ÿ• Behaviourists believe humans โœ–๏ธ different from animals in terms of learning โ€ฆ believe legitimate to generalise from animals to humans BUT argued attachments complex ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€ โ€ฆ โœ–๏ธ explained by conditioning- argued innate
๐Ÿ‘- Development of learning theory (Social Learning Theory)- modelling (imitating ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€ of role models) used to explain attachment ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€- ๐Ÿ‘ถ observe their parentsโ€™ affectionate ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€ & imitate this- ALSO- parents deliberately instruct ๐Ÿ‘ถ about how to behave in relationships (by rewarding appropriate attachment ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€- kisses ๐Ÿ˜˜ & hugs ๐Ÿค—