Lesson 11- Romanian Orphan Studies: Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards
What is an institution?
Institution- place for particular task e.g. looking after πΆ awaiting adoption, caring for mentally ill etc
What gave psychologists the opportunity to study deprivation?
1966- Romanian π·π΄ government tried to β¬οΈ population of π·π΄- encouraged parents have large families & banned abortion-> πΆ βοΈ be cared for by families-> opportunity for psychologists to study deprivation
Who conducted a study on Romanian to study the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation and when did they do so?
Rutter & Songua-Barke (2010)
What was the method used in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Method:
1) 165 π·π΄ πΆ spent early lives in π·π΄ institutions & β¦ suffered effects of institutionalisation were adopted by π¬π§ families
3 age categories of π·π΄ πΆ:
β’ 54 adopted before 6 months old
β’ 57 adopted between 6 months- 2 years old
β’ 54 adopted between 2-4 years old
2) Adoptees tested regularly (ages 4, 6, 11 & 15 years)- assess physical, cognitive π§ & social development
3) Info gathered in interviews with parents & teachers π©βπ«
4) Progress compared to control group of 52 π¬π§ children adopted in π¬π§ before 6 months old
What were the findings in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Findings:
1) At adoption time- π·π΄ orphans behind π¬π§ πΆ in physical, social, emotional & π§ development- e.g. π·π΄ orphans severely malnourished & showed signs of mental retardation
2) BUT by age 4- some π·π΄ πΆ caught up with π¬π§ πΆ- especially those adopted before 6 months old
3) π·π΄ children adopted after 6 months old (experienced longer institutional care)- β¬οΈ likely to suffer social, emotional & π§ deficits & showed signs of βdisinhibited attachmentβ (attention seeking, clingy, & social behaviour same towards all adults, both familiar & unfamiliar)- unusual πβββ as most children at 2 years old still show stranger anxiety
4) Disinhibited attachment caused by π·π΄ πΆ having several carers during critical period & β¦ secure attachment βοΈ formed to any of them
IQ of π·π΄ πΆ at age 11:
β’ Adopted before 6 months- 102
β’ Adopted between 6 months-2 years old- 86
β’ Adopted between 2-4 years old- 77
5) IQ differences remained when πΆ 16 years old
6) πΆ adopted between 2-4 years old β¬οΈ likely suffer mental health issues
What was the conclusion found in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Conclusion:
1) πΆ can recover from institutional care especially if adopted before 6 months old β¦ effects of institutionalisation minimised if πΆ adopted as young as possible (e.g. before 6 months old)
2) OTHERWISE-> long term effects (lack of development- social, emotional & π§ )
What were the evaluation points of the Romanian orphans study?
Evaluation- π·π΄ institution orphans study:
π- βοΈ knowing conditions of orphanages in π·π΄ before πΆ entered π¬π§
π- βοΈ generalise findings- only some πΆ received detailed clinical investigations
π- ethical issues- consent of πΆ problem
π- extraneous variables- natural experiment β¦ could have affected findings e.g. quality of care received from parents of adopted πΆ
Which 2 other psychologist also studied Romanian orphans & what did they find?
1) Le Mare & Audet (2006)
- longitudinal study
- 36 π·π΄ orphans adopted to families in π¨π¦
- Adopted orphans physically smaller than matched control group at 4 & a Β½ years old BUT difference disappeared by age 11
- β¦ recovery possible from effects of institutionalisation on physical development
2) Zeanah et al. (2005)
- 95 π·π΄ πΆ- spent 90% of lives in orphanage compared to control group of 50 πΆ- never been in institution
- Aged between 12 & 31 months- assessed using Strange Situation
- 74% of control group- securely attached
- 19% of institutional group- securely attached
- 65% of institutional group- Type D attachment (disorganised attachments)
- 44% of institutional group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING β¬οΈ)
- 20% of control group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING β¬οΈ)
What were the 4 effects of institutionalisation?
1) Physical underdevelopment
2) Intellectual π§ under-functioning (mental retardation)
3) Disinhibited attachment
4) Poor parenting
How does institutionalisation effect physical development?
Physical underdevelopment:
- πΆ in institutional care- physically smaller-βοΈ emotional care rather than poor nourishment-> deprivation dwarfism
How does institutionalisation effect intellectual development?
Intellectual π§ under-functioning (mental retardation):
- Due to emotional deprivation
- πΆ scored poorly on intelligence tests until transferred to different institution- inmates gave πΆ emotional care-> IQ scores β¬οΈ by up to 30 points
How does institutionalisation effect attachment type?
Disinhibited attachment:
- Form of insecure attachment- πΆ βοΈ discriminate between strangers & non-strangers
- Treat unfamiliar people with inappropriate familiarity & show over-friendliness
How does institutionalisation effect parenting?
Poor parenting:
- Harlow- showed π΅ raised in isolation or with surrogate mother became poor parents
- Quinton et al. (1984)- 50 π© raised in institutions compared with control group of π© reared at normal π
- In 20s ex-institutional π© struggling to be good parents- many of their πΆ spent time in care
What are the evaluation points of institutionalisation studies?
π- Individual differences- βοΈ all πΆ who βοΈ form primary attachment within critical period are unable to recover (research suggested that πΆ βοΈ recover)- some children βοΈ as affected as others BUT Rutter suggested some πΆ did receive special care in institution- maybe π β¬οΈ or just βcuteβ β¦ had some attachment experience
π- Value of longitudinal studies- same πΆ followed up through many years β¦ β¬οΈ able to understand effects of institutionalisation & whether permanent or reversible
π- Methodological & ethical issues- methodological issue- Rutterβs π¬π§ & π·π΄ Adoptee project- πΆ βοΈ randomly assigned to conditions β¦ πΆ adopted early may have been β¬οΈ sociable (extraneous variable)
Ethical issue- π·π΄ orphan studies- consent of adoptees & parents
π- Real life application- research into effects of institutionalisation allowed us to learn that if adoption is to happen- needs to happen whilst πΆ is young as possible (e.g. πΆ adopted before 6 months old hadβοΈ significant problems) & whilst within critical period (first 2-3 years old)