Lesson 11- Romanian Orphan Studies: Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards
What is an institution?
Institution- place for particular task e.g. looking after ๐ถ awaiting adoption, caring for mentally ill etc
What gave psychologists the opportunity to study deprivation?
1966- Romanian ๐ท๐ด government tried to โฌ๏ธ population of ๐ท๐ด- encouraged parents have large families & banned abortion-> ๐ถ โ๏ธ be cared for by families-> opportunity for psychologists to study deprivation
Who conducted a study on Romanian to study the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation and when did they do so?
Rutter & Songua-Barke (2010)
What was the method used in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Method:
1) 165 ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ spent early lives in ๐ท๐ด institutions & โฆ suffered effects of institutionalisation were adopted by ๐ฌ๐ง families
3 age categories of ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ:
โข 54 adopted before 6 months old
โข 57 adopted between 6 months- 2 years old
โข 54 adopted between 2-4 years old
2) Adoptees tested regularly (ages 4, 6, 11 & 15 years)- assess physical, cognitive ๐ง & social development
3) Info gathered in interviews with parents & teachers ๐ฉโ๐ซ
4) Progress compared to control group of 52 ๐ฌ๐ง children adopted in ๐ฌ๐ง before 6 months old
What were the findings in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Findings:
1) At adoption time- ๐ท๐ด orphans behind ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ถ in physical, social, emotional & ๐ง development- e.g. ๐ท๐ด orphans severely malnourished & showed signs of mental retardation
2) BUT by age 4- some ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ caught up with ๐ฌ๐ง ๐ถ- especially those adopted before 6 months old
3) ๐ท๐ด children adopted after 6 months old (experienced longer institutional care)- โฌ๏ธ likely to suffer social, emotional & ๐ง deficits & showed signs of โdisinhibited attachmentโ (attention seeking, clingy, & social behaviour same towards all adults, both familiar & unfamiliar)- unusual ๐โโโ as most children at 2 years old still show stranger anxiety
4) Disinhibited attachment caused by ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ having several carers during critical period & โฆ secure attachment โ๏ธ formed to any of them
IQ of ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ at age 11:
โข Adopted before 6 months- 102
โข Adopted between 6 months-2 years old- 86
โข Adopted between 2-4 years old- 77
5) IQ differences remained when ๐ถ 16 years old
6) ๐ถ adopted between 2-4 years old โฌ๏ธ likely suffer mental health issues
What was the conclusion found in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?
Conclusion:
1) ๐ถ can recover from institutional care especially if adopted before 6 months old โฆ effects of institutionalisation minimised if ๐ถ adopted as young as possible (e.g. before 6 months old)
2) OTHERWISE-> long term effects (lack of development- social, emotional & ๐ง )
What were the evaluation points of the Romanian orphans study?
Evaluation- ๐ท๐ด institution orphans study:
๐- โ๏ธ knowing conditions of orphanages in ๐ท๐ด before ๐ถ entered ๐ฌ๐ง
๐- โ๏ธ generalise findings- only some ๐ถ received detailed clinical investigations
๐- ethical issues- consent of ๐ถ problem
๐- extraneous variables- natural experiment โฆ could have affected findings e.g. quality of care received from parents of adopted ๐ถ
Which 2 other psychologist also studied Romanian orphans & what did they find?
1) Le Mare & Audet (2006)
- longitudinal study
- 36 ๐ท๐ด orphans adopted to families in ๐จ๐ฆ
- Adopted orphans physically smaller than matched control group at 4 & a ยฝ years old BUT difference disappeared by age 11
- โฆ recovery possible from effects of institutionalisation on physical development
2) Zeanah et al. (2005)
- 95 ๐ท๐ด ๐ถ- spent 90% of lives in orphanage compared to control group of 50 ๐ถ- never been in institution
- Aged between 12 & 31 months- assessed using Strange Situation
- 74% of control group- securely attached
- 19% of institutional group- securely attached
- 65% of institutional group- Type D attachment (disorganised attachments)
- 44% of institutional group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING โฌ๏ธ)
- 20% of control group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING โฌ๏ธ)
What were the 4 effects of institutionalisation?
1) Physical underdevelopment
2) Intellectual ๐ง under-functioning (mental retardation)
3) Disinhibited attachment
4) Poor parenting
How does institutionalisation effect physical development?
Physical underdevelopment:
- ๐ถ in institutional care- physically smaller-โ๏ธ emotional care rather than poor nourishment-> deprivation dwarfism
How does institutionalisation effect intellectual development?
Intellectual ๐ง under-functioning (mental retardation):
- Due to emotional deprivation
- ๐ถ scored poorly on intelligence tests until transferred to different institution- inmates gave ๐ถ emotional care-> IQ scores โฌ๏ธ by up to 30 points
How does institutionalisation effect attachment type?
Disinhibited attachment:
- Form of insecure attachment- ๐ถ โ๏ธ discriminate between strangers & non-strangers
- Treat unfamiliar people with inappropriate familiarity & show over-friendliness
How does institutionalisation effect parenting?
Poor parenting:
- Harlow- showed ๐ต raised in isolation or with surrogate mother became poor parents
- Quinton et al. (1984)- 50 ๐ฉ raised in institutions compared with control group of ๐ฉ reared at normal ๐
- In 20s ex-institutional ๐ฉ struggling to be good parents- many of their ๐ถ spent time in care
What are the evaluation points of institutionalisation studies?
๐- Individual differences- โ๏ธ all ๐ถ who โ๏ธ form primary attachment within critical period are unable to recover (research suggested that ๐ถ โ๏ธ recover)- some children โ๏ธ as affected as others BUT Rutter suggested some ๐ถ did receive special care in institution- maybe ๐ โฌ๏ธ or just โcuteโ โฆ had some attachment experience
๐- Value of longitudinal studies- same ๐ถ followed up through many years โฆ โฌ๏ธ able to understand effects of institutionalisation & whether permanent or reversible
๐- Methodological & ethical issues- methodological issue- Rutterโs ๐ฌ๐ง & ๐ท๐ด Adoptee project- ๐ถ โ๏ธ randomly assigned to conditions โฆ ๐ถ adopted early may have been โฌ๏ธ sociable (extraneous variable)
Ethical issue- ๐ท๐ด orphan studies- consent of adoptees & parents
๐- Real life application- research into effects of institutionalisation allowed us to learn that if adoption is to happen- needs to happen whilst ๐ถ is young as possible (e.g. ๐ถ adopted before 6 months old hadโ๏ธ significant problems) & whilst within critical period (first 2-3 years old)