Lesson 11- Romanian Orphan Studies: Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

What is an institution?

A

Institution- place for particular task e.g. looking after πŸ‘Ά awaiting adoption, caring for mentally ill etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What gave psychologists the opportunity to study deprivation?

A

1966- Romanian πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ government tried to ⬆️ population of πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄- encouraged parents have large families & banned abortion-> πŸ‘Ά βœ–οΈ be cared for by families-> opportunity for psychologists to study deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who conducted a study on Romanian to study the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation and when did they do so?

A

Rutter & Songua-Barke (2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the method used in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Method:
1) 165 πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά spent early lives in πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ institutions & … suffered effects of institutionalisation were adopted by πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ families
3 age categories of πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά:
β€’ 54 adopted before 6 months old
β€’ 57 adopted between 6 months- 2 years old
β€’ 54 adopted between 2-4 years old
2) Adoptees tested regularly (ages 4, 6, 11 & 15 years)- assess physical, cognitive 🧠 & social development
3) Info gathered in interviews with parents & teachers πŸ‘©β€πŸ«
4) Progress compared to control group of 52 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ children adopted in πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ before 6 months old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the findings in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Findings:
1) At adoption time- πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ orphans behind πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‘Ά in physical, social, emotional & 🧠 development- e.g. πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ orphans severely malnourished & showed signs of mental retardation
2) BUT by age 4- some πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά caught up with πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‘Ά- especially those adopted before 6 months old
3) πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ children adopted after 6 months old (experienced longer institutional care)- ⬆️ likely to suffer social, emotional & 🧠 deficits & showed signs of β€˜disinhibited attachment’ (attention seeking, clingy, & social behaviour same towards all adults, both familiar & unfamiliar)- unusual πŸƒβ€β™‚β€ as most children at 2 years old still show stranger anxiety
4) Disinhibited attachment caused by πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά having several carers during critical period & … secure attachment βœ–οΈ formed to any of them
IQ of πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά at age 11:
β€’ Adopted before 6 months- 102
β€’ Adopted between 6 months-2 years old- 86
β€’ Adopted between 2-4 years old- 77
5) IQ differences remained when πŸ‘Ά 16 years old
6) πŸ‘Ά adopted between 2-4 years old ⬆️ likely suffer mental health issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the conclusion found in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Conclusion:
1) πŸ‘Ά can recover from institutional care especially if adopted before 6 months old … effects of institutionalisation minimised if πŸ‘Ά adopted as young as possible (e.g. before 6 months old)
2) OTHERWISE-> long term effects (lack of development- social, emotional & 🧠)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the evaluation points of the Romanian orphans study?

A

Evaluation- πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ institution orphans study:
πŸ‘Ž- βœ–οΈ knowing conditions of orphanages in πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ before πŸ‘Ά entered πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
πŸ‘Ž- βœ–οΈ generalise findings- only some πŸ‘Ά received detailed clinical investigations
πŸ‘Ž- ethical issues- consent of πŸ‘Ά problem
πŸ‘Ž- extraneous variables- natural experiment … could have affected findings e.g. quality of care received from parents of adopted πŸ‘Ά

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which 2 other psychologist also studied Romanian orphans & what did they find?

A

1) Le Mare & Audet (2006)
- longitudinal study
- 36 πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ orphans adopted to families in πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
- Adopted orphans physically smaller than matched control group at 4 & a Β½ years old BUT difference disappeared by age 11
- … recovery possible from effects of institutionalisation on physical development

2) Zeanah et al. (2005)
- 95 πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ πŸ‘Ά- spent 90% of lives in orphanage compared to control group of 50 πŸ‘Ά- never been in institution
- Aged between 12 & 31 months- assessed using Strange Situation
- 74% of control group- securely attached
- 19% of institutional group- securely attached
- 65% of institutional group- Type D attachment (disorganised attachments)
- 44% of institutional group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING ⬆️)
- 20% of control group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING ⬆️)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the 4 effects of institutionalisation?

A

1) Physical underdevelopment
2) Intellectual 🧠 under-functioning (mental retardation)
3) Disinhibited attachment
4) Poor parenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does institutionalisation effect physical development?

A

Physical underdevelopment:

- πŸ‘Ά in institutional care- physically smaller-βœ–οΈ emotional care rather than poor nourishment-> deprivation dwarfism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does institutionalisation effect intellectual development?

A

Intellectual 🧠 under-functioning (mental retardation):

  • Due to emotional deprivation
  • πŸ‘Ά scored poorly on intelligence tests until transferred to different institution- inmates gave πŸ‘Ά emotional care-> IQ scores ⬆️ by up to 30 points
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does institutionalisation effect attachment type?

A

Disinhibited attachment:

  • Form of insecure attachment- πŸ‘Ά βœ–οΈ discriminate between strangers & non-strangers
  • Treat unfamiliar people with inappropriate familiarity & show over-friendliness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does institutionalisation effect parenting?

A

Poor parenting:

  • Harlow- showed 🐡 raised in isolation or with surrogate mother became poor parents
  • Quinton et al. (1984)- 50 πŸ‘© raised in institutions compared with control group of πŸ‘© reared at normal 🏠
  • In 20s ex-institutional πŸ‘© struggling to be good parents- many of their πŸ‘Ά spent time in care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the evaluation points of institutionalisation studies?

A

πŸ‘Ž- Individual differences- βœ–οΈ all πŸ‘Ά who βœ–οΈ form primary attachment within critical period are unable to recover (research suggested that πŸ‘Ά βœ–οΈ recover)- some children βœ–οΈ as affected as others BUT Rutter suggested some πŸ‘Ά did receive special care in institution- maybe 😊 ⬆️ or just β€˜cute’ … had some attachment experience
πŸ‘- Value of longitudinal studies- same πŸ‘Ά followed up through many years … ⬆️ able to understand effects of institutionalisation & whether permanent or reversible
πŸ‘Ž- Methodological & ethical issues- methodological issue- Rutter’s πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ & πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ Adoptee project- πŸ‘Ά βœ–οΈ randomly assigned to conditions … πŸ‘Ά adopted early may have been ⬆️ sociable (extraneous variable)
Ethical issue- πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ orphan studies- consent of adoptees & parents
πŸ‘- Real life application- research into effects of institutionalisation allowed us to learn that if adoption is to happen- needs to happen whilst πŸ‘Ά is young as possible (e.g. πŸ‘Ά adopted before 6 months old hadβœ–οΈ significant problems) & whilst within critical period (first 2-3 years old)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly