Lesson 11- Romanian Orphan Studies: Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

What is an institution?

A

Institution- place for particular task e.g. looking after ๐Ÿ‘ถ awaiting adoption, caring for mentally ill etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What gave psychologists the opportunity to study deprivation?

A

1966- Romanian ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด government tried to โฌ†๏ธ population of ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด- encouraged parents have large families & banned abortion-> ๐Ÿ‘ถ โœ–๏ธ be cared for by families-> opportunity for psychologists to study deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who conducted a study on Romanian to study the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation and when did they do so?

A

Rutter & Songua-Barke (2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the method used in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Method:
1) 165 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ spent early lives in ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด institutions & โ€ฆ suffered effects of institutionalisation were adopted by ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง families
3 age categories of ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ:
โ€ข 54 adopted before 6 months old
โ€ข 57 adopted between 6 months- 2 years old
โ€ข 54 adopted between 2-4 years old
2) Adoptees tested regularly (ages 4, 6, 11 & 15 years)- assess physical, cognitive ๐Ÿง  & social development
3) Info gathered in interviews with parents & teachers ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿซ
4) Progress compared to control group of 52 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง children adopted in ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง before 6 months old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the findings in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Findings:
1) At adoption time- ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด orphans behind ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๐Ÿ‘ถ in physical, social, emotional & ๐Ÿง  development- e.g. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด orphans severely malnourished & showed signs of mental retardation
2) BUT by age 4- some ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ caught up with ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๐Ÿ‘ถ- especially those adopted before 6 months old
3) ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด children adopted after 6 months old (experienced longer institutional care)- โฌ†๏ธ likely to suffer social, emotional & ๐Ÿง  deficits & showed signs of โ€˜disinhibited attachmentโ€™ (attention seeking, clingy, & social behaviour same towards all adults, both familiar & unfamiliar)- unusual ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚โ€ as most children at 2 years old still show stranger anxiety
4) Disinhibited attachment caused by ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ having several carers during critical period & โ€ฆ secure attachment โœ–๏ธ formed to any of them
IQ of ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ at age 11:
โ€ข Adopted before 6 months- 102
โ€ข Adopted between 6 months-2 years old- 86
โ€ข Adopted between 2-4 years old- 77
5) IQ differences remained when ๐Ÿ‘ถ 16 years old
6) ๐Ÿ‘ถ adopted between 2-4 years old โฌ†๏ธ likely suffer mental health issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the conclusion found in the study investigating the effects of institutionalisation & hence deprivation?

A

Conclusion:
1) ๐Ÿ‘ถ can recover from institutional care especially if adopted before 6 months old โ€ฆ effects of institutionalisation minimised if ๐Ÿ‘ถ adopted as young as possible (e.g. before 6 months old)
2) OTHERWISE-> long term effects (lack of development- social, emotional & ๐Ÿง )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the evaluation points of the Romanian orphans study?

A

Evaluation- ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด institution orphans study:
๐Ÿ‘Ž- โœ–๏ธ knowing conditions of orphanages in ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด before ๐Ÿ‘ถ entered ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
๐Ÿ‘Ž- โœ–๏ธ generalise findings- only some ๐Ÿ‘ถ received detailed clinical investigations
๐Ÿ‘Ž- ethical issues- consent of ๐Ÿ‘ถ problem
๐Ÿ‘Ž- extraneous variables- natural experiment โ€ฆ could have affected findings e.g. quality of care received from parents of adopted ๐Ÿ‘ถ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which 2 other psychologist also studied Romanian orphans & what did they find?

A

1) Le Mare & Audet (2006)
- longitudinal study
- 36 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด orphans adopted to families in ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
- Adopted orphans physically smaller than matched control group at 4 & a ยฝ years old BUT difference disappeared by age 11
- โ€ฆ recovery possible from effects of institutionalisation on physical development

2) Zeanah et al. (2005)
- 95 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‘ถ- spent 90% of lives in orphanage compared to control group of 50 ๐Ÿ‘ถ- never been in institution
- Aged between 12 & 31 months- assessed using Strange Situation
- 74% of control group- securely attached
- 19% of institutional group- securely attached
- 65% of institutional group- Type D attachment (disorganised attachments)
- 44% of institutional group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING โฌ†๏ธ)
- 20% of control group- disinhibited attachment (SEE ABOVE FOR MEANING โฌ†๏ธ)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the 4 effects of institutionalisation?

A

1) Physical underdevelopment
2) Intellectual ๐Ÿง  under-functioning (mental retardation)
3) Disinhibited attachment
4) Poor parenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does institutionalisation effect physical development?

A

Physical underdevelopment:

- ๐Ÿ‘ถ in institutional care- physically smaller-โœ–๏ธ emotional care rather than poor nourishment-> deprivation dwarfism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does institutionalisation effect intellectual development?

A

Intellectual ๐Ÿง  under-functioning (mental retardation):

  • Due to emotional deprivation
  • ๐Ÿ‘ถ scored poorly on intelligence tests until transferred to different institution- inmates gave ๐Ÿ‘ถ emotional care-> IQ scores โฌ†๏ธ by up to 30 points
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does institutionalisation effect attachment type?

A

Disinhibited attachment:

  • Form of insecure attachment- ๐Ÿ‘ถ โœ–๏ธ discriminate between strangers & non-strangers
  • Treat unfamiliar people with inappropriate familiarity & show over-friendliness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does institutionalisation effect parenting?

A

Poor parenting:

  • Harlow- showed ๐Ÿต raised in isolation or with surrogate mother became poor parents
  • Quinton et al. (1984)- 50 ๐Ÿ‘ฉ raised in institutions compared with control group of ๐Ÿ‘ฉ reared at normal ๐Ÿ 
  • In 20s ex-institutional ๐Ÿ‘ฉ struggling to be good parents- many of their ๐Ÿ‘ถ spent time in care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the evaluation points of institutionalisation studies?

A

๐Ÿ‘Ž- Individual differences- โœ–๏ธ all ๐Ÿ‘ถ who โœ–๏ธ form primary attachment within critical period are unable to recover (research suggested that ๐Ÿ‘ถ โœ–๏ธ recover)- some children โœ–๏ธ as affected as others BUT Rutter suggested some ๐Ÿ‘ถ did receive special care in institution- maybe ๐Ÿ˜Š โฌ†๏ธ or just โ€˜cuteโ€™ โ€ฆ had some attachment experience
๐Ÿ‘- Value of longitudinal studies- same ๐Ÿ‘ถ followed up through many years โ€ฆ โฌ†๏ธ able to understand effects of institutionalisation & whether permanent or reversible
๐Ÿ‘Ž- Methodological & ethical issues- methodological issue- Rutterโ€™s ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง & ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Adoptee project- ๐Ÿ‘ถ โœ–๏ธ randomly assigned to conditions โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ‘ถ adopted early may have been โฌ†๏ธ sociable (extraneous variable)
Ethical issue- ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด orphan studies- consent of adoptees & parents
๐Ÿ‘- Real life application- research into effects of institutionalisation allowed us to learn that if adoption is to happen- needs to happen whilst ๐Ÿ‘ถ is young as possible (e.g. ๐Ÿ‘ถ adopted before 6 months old hadโœ–๏ธ significant problems) & whilst within critical period (first 2-3 years old)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly