Lesson 1- Caregiver-Infant Interactions in Humans- Reciprocity & Interactional Synchrony Flashcards
What is infancy?
Infancy- period of πΆβs life before speech begins
What type of communication is therefore most prominent between an infant & caregiver & how does this influence the relationship formed?
β¦ βοΈ-verbal communication π interaction between caregiver & infant πΆ (βοΈ words/sound)
Form basis of attachment between an infant & caregiver- manner of each response to other determines attachment (the β¬οΈ sensitive each is to the otherβs signals, the deeper the relationship)
What is reciprocity?
Reciprocity- interaction reciprocal when each person responds to other & elicits response from them
Give an example of how a reciprocal conversation between an infant & caregiver would be
Example- infants coordinate actions with caregivers in a kind of conversation- move in rhythm when interacting with adult (take turns- like ppl in conversation- 1 person talks, the other listens etc)
What 2 statements about reciprocity did Brazelton make & when did he make them?
Brazelton et al. (1975)- described interaction (reciprocity) as a dance π (each partner responds to each otherβs moves)
Brazelton (1979)- basic rhythm important for later communications- regularity of signals allows caregiver to anticipate infants πβββ & respond appropriately- sensitivity to infant πβββ lays foundation for later attachment between caregiver & infant
What is interactional synchrony?
Interactional synchrony- the temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour (πβββ reflection)
Who studied interactional synchrony & when did they do so?
Meltzoff & Moore (1977)
What was the method used for Meltzoff & Mooreβs interactional synchrony study?
1) Use of controlled observation
2) 4 different stimuli (3 different faces & 3 π gesture) used to observe πβββ of infants in response
3) Adult π§ model used- displayed 1 out of 3 facial expressions/π movements
4) Dummy placed in infantβs π during initial display to prevent response- AFTER display, dummy removed & πΆβs expression filmed on video
5) Video judged by independent observer (βοΈ know what infant had seen)- watched videotapes of infantβs πβββ in real time, slow motion & frame by frame if necessary
6) Each observer noted infant reactions using the following behavioural categories:
- π opening
- π closing
- π
protrusion
- π
retraction
7) Each observer scored tapes twice so that both intra-observer (same observer) & inter-observer reliability (different observers) could be calculated & all scores β¬οΈ than 0.92
What were the findings of Meltzoff & Mooreβs interactional synchrony study?
8) Infants πΆ as young as 2-3 weeks old imitated specific facial gestures & β¦ association between πΆ πβββ & adult π§ model
9) Later study- Meltzoff & Moore demonstrated same synchrony with πΆ only 3 days old- β¦ suggests interactional synchrony innate & βοΈ learned
10) SUPPORTED BY- Murray & Trevarthen (1985) research- 2-month-old (βοΈ 1 year old- SEE β¬οΈ) infants 1st interacted via video monitor with mother in real time- THEN video monitor played tape of mother (image on screen βοΈ responding to infantsβ facial & bodily gestures-> acute distress from infants- πΆ tried to attract mothersβ interest
but gained βοΈ response β¦ turned away- shows infant is actively eliciting response
rather than just displaying a response that has been rewarded. This study shows the importance of interactional synchrony
11) BUT Piaget (1962)- argued that infants this young βοΈ imitate intentionally- instead copying due to reward of caregiver π & βοΈ interactional synchrony- argued that true imitation happened after the child was 1 year old
What are the evaluation points of caregiver-infant interactions through reciprocity & interactional synchrony?
π- problems with testing infant behaviour- πΆ π in fairly constant motion & tested expressions occur frequently e.g. π, π₯± π€ , π etc β¦ difficult to distinguish between general activity & specific imitated πβββ
π- value of research- shows how basis for social development formed- Meltzoff (2005) developed a βlike meβ hypothesis based on interactional synchrony research-> baby associates imitation with feelings & π of others-> understanding how others π€ & feel (Theory of Mind)-> ability to construct relationships
π- individual differences- variation between infants behaviour- e.g. Isabella et al (1989) found β¬οΈ πͺ attached infant-caregiver pairs showed β¬οΈ interactional synchrony
π- intentionality of infant πβββ- response to inanimate objects. Abravenal & DeYoung (1991) observed πΆ πβββ when interacting with 2 objects- 1 simulating π
movements & other π opening/closing- found infants between ages 5-12 weeks made little response to objects β¦ shows that babies βοΈ just imitate what they π- BUT socially respond to other humans