Lesson 1- Caregiver-Infant Interactions in Humans- Reciprocity & Interactional Synchrony Flashcards
What is infancy?
Infancy- period of ๐ถโs life before speech begins
What type of communication is therefore most prominent between an infant & caregiver & how does this influence the relationship formed?
โฆ โ๏ธ-verbal communication ๐ interaction between caregiver & infant ๐ถ (โ๏ธ words/sound)
Form basis of attachment between an infant & caregiver- manner of each response to other determines attachment (the โฌ๏ธ sensitive each is to the otherโs signals, the deeper the relationship)
What is reciprocity?
Reciprocity- interaction reciprocal when each person responds to other & elicits response from them
Give an example of how a reciprocal conversation between an infant & caregiver would be
Example- infants coordinate actions with caregivers in a kind of conversation- move in rhythm when interacting with adult (take turns- like ppl in conversation- 1 person talks, the other listens etc)
What 2 statements about reciprocity did Brazelton make & when did he make them?
Brazelton et al. (1975)- described interaction (reciprocity) as a dance ๐ (each partner responds to each otherโs moves)
Brazelton (1979)- basic rhythm important for later communications- regularity of signals allows caregiver to anticipate infants ๐โโโ & respond appropriately- sensitivity to infant ๐โโโ lays foundation for later attachment between caregiver & infant
What is interactional synchrony?
Interactional synchrony- the temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour (๐โโโ reflection)
Who studied interactional synchrony & when did they do so?
Meltzoff & Moore (1977)
What was the method used for Meltzoff & Mooreโs interactional synchrony study?
1) Use of controlled observation
2) 4 different stimuli (3 different faces & 3 ๐ gesture) used to observe ๐โโโ of infants in response
3) Adult ๐ง model used- displayed 1 out of 3 facial expressions/๐ movements
4) Dummy placed in infantโs ๐ during initial display to prevent response- AFTER display, dummy removed & ๐ถโs expression filmed on video
5) Video judged by independent observer (โ๏ธ know what infant had seen)- watched videotapes of infantโs ๐โโโ in real time, slow motion & frame by frame if necessary
6) Each observer noted infant reactions using the following behavioural categories:
- ๐ opening
- ๐ closing
- ๐
protrusion
- ๐
retraction
7) Each observer scored tapes twice so that both intra-observer (same observer) & inter-observer reliability (different observers) could be calculated & all scores โฌ๏ธ than 0.92
What were the findings of Meltzoff & Mooreโs interactional synchrony study?
8) Infants ๐ถ as young as 2-3 weeks old imitated specific facial gestures & โฆ association between ๐ถ ๐โโโ & adult ๐ง model
9) Later study- Meltzoff & Moore demonstrated same synchrony with ๐ถ only 3 days old- โฆ suggests interactional synchrony innate & โ๏ธ learned
10) SUPPORTED BY- Murray & Trevarthen (1985) research- 2-month-old (โ๏ธ 1 year old- SEE โฌ๏ธ) infants 1st interacted via video monitor with mother in real time- THEN video monitor played tape of mother (image on screen โ๏ธ responding to infantsโ facial & bodily gestures-> acute distress from infants- ๐ถ tried to attract mothersโ interest
but gained โ๏ธ response โฆ turned away- shows infant is actively eliciting response
rather than just displaying a response that has been rewarded. This study shows the importance of interactional synchrony
11) BUT Piaget (1962)- argued that infants this young โ๏ธ imitate intentionally- instead copying due to reward of caregiver ๐ & โ๏ธ interactional synchrony- argued that true imitation happened after the child was 1 year old
What are the evaluation points of caregiver-infant interactions through reciprocity & interactional synchrony?
๐- problems with testing infant behaviour- ๐ถ ๐ in fairly constant motion & tested expressions occur frequently e.g. ๐, ๐ฅฑ ๐ค , ๐ etc โฆ difficult to distinguish between general activity & specific imitated ๐โโโ
๐- value of research- shows how basis for social development formed- Meltzoff (2005) developed a โlike meโ hypothesis based on interactional synchrony research-> baby associates imitation with feelings & ๐ญ of others-> understanding how others ๐ค & feel (Theory of Mind)-> ability to construct relationships
๐- individual differences- variation between infants behaviour- e.g. Isabella et al (1989) found โฌ๏ธ ๐ช attached infant-caregiver pairs showed โฌ๏ธ interactional synchrony
๐- intentionality of infant ๐โโโ- response to inanimate objects. Abravenal & DeYoung (1991) observed ๐ถ ๐โโโ when interacting with 2 objects- 1 simulating ๐
movements & other ๐ opening/closing- found infants between ages 5-12 weeks made little response to objects โฆ shows that babies โ๏ธ just imitate what they ๐- BUT socially respond to other humans