Lesson 11: Attention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Inattentional (Change) Blindness

A

Occurs when a stimulus is not attended and therefore is not perceived, even if you look directly at it (does not go into LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mack and ROck (1998)

A

Indicate which arm was longer, and then asked what shape they saw and reported not seeing a shape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cocktail Party Phenomenon/Cherry’s Shadowing Experiments

A

Dichotic Listening: simultaneously listening got 2 streams of audio
Shadowing: repeating out loud one of the messages
- Can sense physical and sensory changes (language/music/gender), but not semantic changes (change of language, playing message backward)
-Subjects can notice their name and shadow meaningful messages that switch ears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Broadbent’s Filter Theory

A

Messages→→Sensory Memory→→Filter (Attended message remains)→Detector→Memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Early Selection Theory

A

Inputs(senses)→Perceptual analyses (filter)→Semantic Encoding→Executive Functions→Output
- makes the least sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Treisman’s Leaky Filter

A

Unattended info can break through and be perceived if they are high enough priority. Unattended channel is only degraded or attenuated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Attenuating (Leaky) Filter

A

Inputs→→Perceptual Analysis→→Semantic Encoding→Executive functions→Output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MacKay’s Late Selection THeory

A

Only at the output/conscious experience where the consciousness happens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Late Selection Theory

A

Inputs→→Perceptual Analysis→→Semantic Encoding→→Executive functions→Output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Processing Cap and Limits

A

We select what we want to attend to and if our attention is divided b/w 2+ things = poor perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stroop Task

A

Naming the color of the writing out loud
- Word nae interferes with task ability because reading of the words is automatic and uses attentional resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attentional Blink Paradigm

A

Single vs Dual task
- Better at dual tasks when there is a larger T1-T2 lag
-Attentional resources are used up by processing the 1st target and causing a “blink” for the 2nd target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Inattentional Deafness

A

Super focused on auditory things you can miss visual things and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Overt Attention

A

The focus of attention follows the gaze of the eye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Covert Attention

A

The focus of attention in the peripheral vision (not dependent on gaze)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Eye Tracking (usually covert)

A

Illuminates eyeball with light and can see pupil and corneal reflection. Pupil moves as you look around screen and corneal reflection stays still.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Eye Tracker Calibration

A

Tell them to look at target and take note of pupil and corneal reflection, then calculate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Eye Trackers

A

Get information on where the subject is paying attention and what areas are of the most interest (able to see what captures people’s attention the most on websites)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Saccades

A

Movement of Eyes provided by eye tracking

20
Q

Fixations

A

When your eyes stop on something (tells durations)

21
Q

Covert Attention (Hermann von Helmholtz)

A

Pay attention to certain areas on screen even when you’re not looking at it

22
Q

Posner Paradigm

A

Valid: most accurate and faster reaction time (arrow points to target)
Invalid: least accurate and slower reaction time (arrow points opposite target)
Neutral: neutral

23
Q

Benefit of Attention

A

If attention already there, you benefit and respond quickly/accurately/increased visual processing (Endogenous). Quicker to valid.

24
Q

Cost of Attention

A

Having to move attention over costs you more accuracy/time (Exogenous). QuicSlowerker to invalid.

25
Q

Endogenous/Voluntary Attention

A
  • Goal driven/effortful
  • Tested with a central symbolic cue (arrow)
  • Long-lasting
  • Can be directed covertly or overtly
26
Q

ERP Effects of Endogenous Attention

A

Stronger neural response for things you pay attention to

27
Q

Divided Attention

A

Amount of visual processing modulated with how much attention you pay
- More direction towards target, amplitude for ERPS increased at P1 and N1

28
Q

Exogenous/Reflexive Capture of Attention

A
  • Automatic
  • Can be tested with a peripheral cue (sudden onset/physically salient clue)
  • Expires quickly
    -Can be directed covertly or overtly
29
Q

Inhibition of Return (Exogenous)

A

Same pattern of behavioral and ERP results exist with exogenous attention as with voluntary until after the first 300 ms where the processing of invalid stimulus is not enhanced (fast rxn time, better accuracy than valid cue)

30
Q

Hopfinger and Mangun

A

Found IOR for ERP’s with increased P1 for longer times at invalid cue

31
Q

Distracters

A

Same color distracters and different color target = same reaction time with more distracters
Distracters same color as target = more reaction time with more distracters

32
Q

Valid Search

A

Salient features pop out (average time it takes the subject to respond when the target was present is not affected nu how many distracted are in the display)

33
Q

Valid Search

A

Salient features pop out (average time it takes the subject to respond when the target was present is not affected by how many distracted are in the display)

34
Q

Saliency Maps

A

Certain salient features direct your attention and keep it)

35
Q

Meaningful Items Affecting Reflexive Attention

A

Faces, ACS, Schemas + Semantic Consistency, Memory + Familiarity, Addictive Stimuli

36
Q

Autism vs Normal

A

Things like faces don’t directly capture what autistic people see
- Normal people see faces and also are captured by what’s drawing the faces attention

37
Q

Inattentional Blindness Study + Faces

A

When asked to see which arm is longer, intentional blindness decreased with faces

38
Q

Joint Study

A

Valid trials had a decreased reaction time and invalid trials increased reaction time

39
Q

Attentional Control Settings

A

Like when you search for someone in red, everything in red pops out

40
Q

Schemas and Semantic Consistency

A

Semantically inconsistent objects did not capture attention immediately but held it longer
- Saccades: look everywhere
- Fixation: fixate on inconsistent objects

41
Q

Working Memory and Attention

A

Look at face and hold it in WM and then 2 face cues popped up and 1 matches target is valid and invalid and decide whether it matched or not
- Findings: Increased RT when target appeared where image was in WM, object drew in attention

42
Q

LTM and Attention

A

If something grabs your attention, processing of information at the same location will be enhanced

43
Q

Memory and Attention

A

Things you’re familiar with capture/hold your attention initially and longer

44
Q

Attentional Bias in Addiction

A

There is an attentional bias toward your stimulus of choice

45
Q

Unilateral Neglect Syndrome

A

Patient fails to acknowledge objects/events exist in the hemispace opposite lesion (usually in right so you neglect left side of space)
- common after stroke
(even in memory)