Legal Unit 1 Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Define defamation

A

Act of damaging someone’s reputation, either personally or professionally, through the communication or publication of false and untrue statements or information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define breach

A

A breach is a break of or a failure to fulfil a duty or obligation. In most types of civil law cases, it must be proven that there has been a breach by the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define causation

A

Direct relationship between one event and another. Where there has not been a break in causation, the first event caused the second, and the second would not have happened without the first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define plaintiff

A

The plaintiff in a civil dispute is the party who makes a legal claim against another party in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define defendant

A

The defendant in a civil dispute is a party who has allegedly breached a civil law and is being sued by the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define tort

A

A tort is a civil wrong that interferes with a person’s legally protected interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define loss

A

A loss is a type of harm suffered by a person, which can either be economic or non-economic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List and describe 5 losses that can be present in a civil claim

A
  • Economic loss: loss of wages, earning capacity, or profits. Can also be money spent on medical expenses
  • Property damage: damage to a car, house, clothing, goods, etc.
  • Personal injury: cuts, bruises, broken bones, loss of limb, etc.
  • Pain and suffering: mental anguish, anxiety, depression, etc.
  • Loss of amenity: loss of enjoyment of life, job satisfaction, family life or enjoyment of hobbies, etc.

Eco. loss, property damage, personal injury, pain/suff., loss of amenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define and explain the benefits of the limitation of actions

A

The limitation of actions is the restriction applied to civil law claims that states they must be brought to court within a certain period.

This is a necessary restriction as it allows disputes to be resolved efficiently and reliably, as evidence does not have as much time to decay or be forgotten by those involved. It also makes it so that a defendant is not subjected to a claim a significant time after the alleged act or omission occurred

Quick resolution, reliable decision, and less chance for decay of ev.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

List and briefly explain the elements of negligence

A
  • The defendant must have owed the plaintiff a duty of care
  • There must have been a breach in this duty of care by the defendant
  • There was a clear and unbroken causal link
  • The plaintiff must have suffered some sort of loss (injury, damage, etc.)

Duty of care, breach in this duty, unbroken causal link, loss as result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

List and briefly explain the elements of defamation

A
  • The statement must have been defamatory (i.e. it has lowered their reputation or standing in the community)
  • The statement must be untrue
  • The statement must refer to the plaintiff
  • The statement must have been published by the defendant (once a third person hears or sees the material, the claim is actionable)

Defamatory, untrue, refers to the plaintiff, published by the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define sue

A

To sue a person or an institution is to institute legal proceedings against them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe two purposes of civil law and a way in which they are achieved

3 purposes, 1 paragraph

A
  • Aims to achieve social cohesion (community working together, rights upheld)
  • Protects the rights of individuals (freedom of speech, religion, right to vote and silence)
  • Provides a way for people to seek compensation after a breach of civil law has occurred

Social cohesion is achieved through providing guidelines for acceptable behaviour in the community, for example, by implementing laws to maintain processes and procedures within childcare businesses and schools, in order to protect the children within their care. It also protects the rights of individuals, through the right not to be harmed and not to have one’s reputation damaged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Identify two types of civil law and explain one of these

A

Defamation and negligence are both types of civil law. Defamation is the tort which involves the action of damaging someone’s reputation, either personally or professionally, through the publication or communication of false statements or information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define and explain the balance of probabilities

A

The balance of probabilities is the standard of proof in civil disputes. This requires the plaintiff to establish that it is more likely than not that their version of the facts is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List and briefly describe defences to defamation

5 main ones

A
  • Justification (statement is partially true)
  • Contextual truth (stated in the same context as other, substantially true statements, where the defamatory statements do not further harm the plaintiff)
  • Honest opinion (rather than a statement of fact)
  • Innocent dissemination (unknowingly distributed by libraries, publishers, etc)
  • Triviality (plaintiff is unlikely to be harmed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the role of the law in developing the elements of and the defences to defamation

A
  • Before 2006, defamation was a common law offence
  • Used to be split into libel and slander (written and spoken defamation)
  • Defamation Act 2005 abolished the distinction
  • Common law established the freedom of political communication (cannot be sued for defamation after freely speaking on political matters)
  • Statute law upheld most of the common law elements and defences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe the role of the law in developing the elements of and the defences to negligence

A
  • The English case Donoghue v Stephenson establsihed the tort of negligence
  • Adopted in Australia after Grant v Australian Knitting Mills
  • D v S allowed a plaintiff to take action if the defendant did not act in a way to protect the interests of their neighbor
  • Statutes were passed in 2003 after the tort of negligence was seen as unclear and unpredictable (too easy for plaintiffs)
  • Statute requires people that provide services to provide them with “due care and skill”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

List and briefly describe defences to negligence

A
  • Contributory negligence: the plaintiff is partly to blame for the damages, usually results in less compensation
  • Assumption of risk/“volenti non fit injuria”: the plaintiff was aware of an obvious risk and chose to take this risk (to a willing person, injury is not done)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe the rights protected by negligence laws

A
  • Protects people from wrongful conduct by others (recklessness, with complete disregard for others)
  • Allows parties to seek compensation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe the rights protected by defamation laws

A
  • The right to freedom of expression
  • The right to be of good character and reputation
  • The right to have character protected through limits on freedom of expression
  • Ability to seek compensation after reputation has been damaged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Describe the possible impacts of a breach of defamation law

A
  • Plaintiff (reputation damaged, emotional impact of the content, loss of wages/livelihood, unemployment)
  • Defendant (public humiliation, need to sell assets, costs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe the possible impacts of a breach of negligence law

A
  • Plaintiff (loss of life, injury, permanent physical incapacity, mental health impact, emotional damage, loss of wages/livelihood)
  • Defendant (loss of business, public humiliation, physical injury, costs, need to sell assets)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

List the possible parties to a civil dispute

A
  • Plaintiff (aggrieved party, other parties involved, insurers)
  • Defendant (wrongdoer, employer, persons involved in the wrongdoing, insurers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Define vicarious liability

A

To be vicariously liable is to be legally responsible for the wrongful acts of another (such as an employer being liable for the acts of their employee)

26
Q

Identify the two states of mind that establish malice aforethought

A

An intention to kill
An intention to inflict serious injury
Reckless indifference
An intention to assault a person making a lawful arrest (resulting in death)
An unintentional killing in the process of committing a violent crime worth 10 years or more

27
Q

What are the five aspects of an effective law?

A
  1. Reflect society’s values
  2. Be known
  3. Be clear and understood
  4. Be enforceable
  5. Be stable

VESCK (Values, enforceable, stable, clear, known)

28
Q

Define social cohesion

A

Socially cohesive society: laws are followed, functioning and productive society, rights of individuals protected

29
Q

What is statutory interpretation?

A

The act of a judge interpreting and applying the words written in statute to a case

30
Q

What does ‘ratio decidendi’ mean?

A

It describes the reason for a decision

31
Q

What does ‘stare decisis’ mean?

A

It describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)

32
Q

What is the term that describes the reason for a decision?

A

Ratio decidendi

33
Q

What is the term that describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)

A

Stare decisis

34
Q

PASTA (and its purpose)

A

Precedent
Appeals
Specialisation
Time and money
Administrative convenience

These are all reasons for the existence of the Victorian Court hierarchy

35
Q

To distinguish precedent

A

Where a judge shows that there are significant differences between the facts in the case before the court and the facts of the precedent setting case

36
Q

To overrule precedent (and what happens when this is done)

A

Higher court overrules lower court’s precedent, new precedent created

37
Q

To reverse precedent (and what happens when this is done)

A

Higher court reverses precedent established after appeal, appellate court created new precedent

38
Q

To disapprove precedent

A

Where courts on the same level (since they are not bound by their own decisions), can disapprove of the precedent set earlier, create a new one, and both will remain until a higher court sets a binding precedent. Sometimes courts are bound by a precedent but can still disapprove and this may affect future decisions and new precedent made higher in the court hierarchy.

39
Q

Describe two sources of law

A

Common law, no existing statute or statute interpreted, precedent and statutory interpretation

Statute law, bill passed through both houses, royal assent

40
Q

Distinguish between binding and persuasive precedent

A

Binding: higher court in same hierarchy, material facts are similar

Persuasuve: all other cases, may be taken into account (diff. hierarchy, lower or equal court)

41
Q

Define obiter dictum

A

Meaning “by the way”, a comment made by a judge that only exists to possibly persuade future cases, and does not form the reasoning of a decision.

42
Q

List and describe four main features of the relationship between the parliament and courts

A

Statutory interpretation: courts interpret statute, create precedent
Codification: statute passed to solidify principle made through common law
Abrogation: statute passed to specifically abolish common law principle (parliament doesn’t agree, court interpreted statute wrong)
Ability of courts to influence parliament: indicate in judgement that they believe a law should be changed (don’t want to change it themselves, parliament are in a better position to do so, etc.)

43
Q

Describe the role of individuals in achieving social cohesion

A

Responsible for knowing and abiding by laws
Learning other laws that affect them (business, maritime, etc.)
Respect human rights
Assisting investigations

44
Q

Describe the role of the law in achieving social cohesion

A

Set boundaries and expectations on behaviour
Protect the rights of individuals (discrimination, etc.)
Outline resolutions and consequences to conflicts

45
Q

Describe the role of the legal system in achieving social cohesion

A

Apply and enforce the law
Protect and respect the rights of individuals
Settle disputes in a positive way (courts, tribunals)

46
Q

Purposes of criminal law (x4)

A
  • Protect individuals
  • Protect property
  • Protect society
  • Protect justice
47
Q

Define the term crime (x3) and provide an example

A

A crime is…
- an act or omission against an existing law
- harmful to an individual or society
- punishable by law (by the state)

Examples: homicide, murder, rape, arson, etc.

48
Q

Distinguish between the two elements of a crime

A
  1. actus reus: the “guilty act”. The wrongful action (or inaction) must be proven in a trial/hearing in order for the accused to be found guilty.
  2. mens rea: the “guilty mind”. The accused must have knowingly or intentionally committed the wrongful action (or inaction).
49
Q

Explain what is meant by the presumption of innocence and its relation to the burden of proof

A

The presumption of innocence is a principle and a guarantee that the accused will not be treated as guilty until the charge has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. This means that the burden of proof, or the responsibility of proving the accused’s guilt, lies with the prosecution.

50
Q

Distinguish between a summary and an indictable offence

A

A summary offence is a minor criminal offence that is generally heard in the Magistrates’ Court without a jury. The procedures used for these offences are less complex than those used for indictable offences. These are serious criminal offences heard in the presence of a jury in either the Supreme or County Court.

51
Q

How is the presumption of innocence upheld?

A
  • Standard of proof
  • Burden of proof
  • The right to silence
  • Bail
  • Reasonable belief of guilt before arrest
  • Prior convictions not known until sentencing
  • The right to appeal
52
Q

Define the term “strict liability crime”

A

A strict liability crime is one in which the mens rea does not need to be present in order to find the accused guilty; for example, the action of speeding is enough to establish guilt

53
Q

Distinguish between crimes against the person and property

A

Person: actions or omissions causing death, injury, danger to life or apprehension of harm. E.g. homicide, sexual assault, robbery, blackmail extortion.

Property: theft or destruction of someone’s property, e.g. arson, property damage, burglary, theft.

54
Q

What are the requirements for an indictable offence to be able to be heard summarily?

A

The accused must consent and the charge must not be punishable by more than 10 years in prison or a fine greater than 1200 penalty units ($200k)

55
Q

Define “accessory”

A

An accessory is someone who, without a lawful excuse, assists a principal offender after the crime has been committed. They must know that the offender has committed a serious indictable offence to be labelled as an accessory

56
Q

Identify states of mind that establish malice aforethought

A

An intention to kill/inflict serious injury/assault a person making a lawful arrest (resulting in death)
Reckless indifference
Unintentional killing while committing a violent crime (≥10 years jail)

57
Q

Describe general defences to crimes

A

Self-defence, mental impairment, duress, sudden/extraordinary emergency, automatism, intoxication, accident

58
Q

List the elements of murder

A
  • Unlawful killing
  • Victim was a person
  • Killer was over the age of discretion
  • Killer caused the death
  • Killer was of sound mind
  • Malice aforethought
59
Q

Defences to murder

A
  • No malice aforethought
  • Break in causation, actions did not substantially cause the death
  • Not of sound mind
60
Q

Describe the role of the law in developing the elements of and defences to murder

A

Common law: originally CL, elements/defences developed through CL, such as intoxication, automatism and accident

Statute law: penalty and defences laid out in statute, abrogates CL elements and defences to murder (offence of defensive homicide, defence of provocation)