Legal SAC 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the five aspects of an effective law?

A
  1. Reflect society’s values
  2. Be known
  3. Be clear and understood
  4. Be enforceable
  5. Be stable

VESCK (Values, enforceable, stable, clear, known)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define social cohesion

A

Socially cohesive society: laws are followed, functioning and productive society, rights of individuals protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is statutory interpretation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘ratio decidendi’ mean?

A

It describes the reason for a decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the role of the legal system in achieving social cohesion

A

Apply and enforce the law
Protect and respect the rights of individuals
Settle disputes in a positive way (courts, tribunals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the role of the law in achieving social cohesion

A

Set boundaries and expectations on behaviour
Protect the rights of individuals (discrimination, etc.)
Outline resolutions and consequences to conflicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the role of individuals in achieving social cohesion

A

Responsible for knowing and abiding by laws
Learning other laws that affect them (business, maritime, etc.)
Respect human rights
Assisting investigations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does ‘stare decisis’ mean?

A

It describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the term that describes the reason for a decision?

A

Ratio decidendi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the term that describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)

A

Stare decisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PASTA (and its purpose)

A

Precedent
Appeals
Specialisation
Time and money
Administrative convenience

These are all reasons for the existence of the Victorian Court hierarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

To distinguish precedent

A

Where a judge shows that there are significant differences between the facts in the case before the court and the facts of the precedent setting case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

To overrule precedent (and what happens when this is done)

A

Higher court overrules lower court’s precedent, new precedent created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To reverse precedent (and what happens when this is done)

A

Higher court reverses precedent established after appeal, appellate court created new precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To disapprove precedent

A

Where courts on the same level (since they are not bound by their own decisions), can disapprove of the precedent set earlier, create a new one, and both will remain until a higher court sets a binding precedent. Sometimes courts are bound by a precedent but can still disapprove and this may affect future decisions and new precedent made higher in the court hierarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe two sources of law

A

Common law, no existing statute or statute interpreted, precedent and statutory interpretation

Statute law, bill passed through both houses, royal assent

17
Q

Distinguish between binding and persuasive precedent

A

Binding: higher court in same hierarchy, material facts are similar

Persuasuve: all other cases, may be taken into account (diff. hierarchy, lower or equal court)

18
Q

Define obiter dictum

A

Meaning “by the way”, a comment made by a judge that only exists to possibly persuade future cases, and does not form the reasoning of a decision.

19
Q

List and describe four main features of the relationship between the parliament and courts

A

Statutory interpretation: courts interpret statute, create precedent
Codification: statute passed to solidify principle made through common law
Abrogation: statute passed to specifically abolish common law principle (parliament doesn’t agree, court interpreted statute wrong)
Ability of courts to influence parliament: indicate in judgement that they believe a law should be changed (don’t want to change it themselves, parliament are in a better position to do so, etc.)