Legal SAC 1 Flashcards
What are the five aspects of an effective law?
- Reflect society’s values
- Be known
- Be clear and understood
- Be enforceable
- Be stable
VESCK (Values, enforceable, stable, clear, known)
Define social cohesion
Socially cohesive society: laws are followed, functioning and productive society, rights of individuals protected
What is statutory interpretation?
What does ‘ratio decidendi’ mean?
It describes the reason for a decision
Describe the role of the legal system in achieving social cohesion
Apply and enforce the law
Protect and respect the rights of individuals
Settle disputes in a positive way (courts, tribunals)
Describe the role of the law in achieving social cohesion
Set boundaries and expectations on behaviour
Protect the rights of individuals (discrimination, etc.)
Outline resolutions and consequences to conflicts
Describe the role of individuals in achieving social cohesion
Responsible for knowing and abiding by laws
Learning other laws that affect them (business, maritime, etc.)
Respect human rights
Assisting investigations
What does ‘stare decisis’ mean?
It describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)
What is the term that describes the reason for a decision?
Ratio decidendi
What is the term that describes standing by what has been decided (notably in the case of precedent)
Stare decisis
PASTA (and its purpose)
Precedent
Appeals
Specialisation
Time and money
Administrative convenience
These are all reasons for the existence of the Victorian Court hierarchy
To distinguish precedent
Where a judge shows that there are significant differences between the facts in the case before the court and the facts of the precedent setting case
To overrule precedent (and what happens when this is done)
Higher court overrules lower court’s precedent, new precedent created
To reverse precedent (and what happens when this is done)
Higher court reverses precedent established after appeal, appellate court created new precedent
To disapprove precedent
Where courts on the same level (since they are not bound by their own decisions), can disapprove of the precedent set earlier, create a new one, and both will remain until a higher court sets a binding precedent. Sometimes courts are bound by a precedent but can still disapprove and this may affect future decisions and new precedent made higher in the court hierarchy.