Lecture 9: Social Behaviour Flashcards
Costs of group living:
- more competition for resources (e.g. food, mates)
- more conspicuous to predators
- susceptible to parasites (incl. brood parasites) & disease
- conspecifics may kill offspring
benefits of group living:
- improved foraging efficiency
- less chance of being predated (dilution and confusion effects)
- improved defence of resources from non-group members
- communal care of offspring
Costs of group living in cliff swallows;
- they breed in colonies & suffer from a blood-sucking parasitic bug
- more bugs per nest in larger colonies
- the more bugs a chick has on it, the slower it grows
experiment to look into whether ‘do bugs cause chicks to grow slower?’ with cliff swallowed
Mary & Charles Brown fumigated half the nests in a colony to see whether this improved chick growth.
IT DID, providing evidence to infer causation
Benefits of group living in guillemots
- they breed at higher densities than any other bird, up to 70 individuals/m2.
- WHY? what is the adaptive significance of breeding in such close proximity?
- -> breeding success increases with group density, = more neighbours = greater safety from predatory gulls
animal lifestyles types:
- solaritary like moose
- social bird groups described
why do guillemots allopreen or groom each other?
- reduce parasite burden?
- reduces stress (important in these tightly packed conditions)
- build relationships that reduce local competition
how does unselfish behaviour evolve?
individuals can gain fitness through success of relatives. Can drive altuirstic behaviour. Bill (william) Hamiltons theory of kin selection/inclusive behaviour
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: how many birds live together
500 birds in huge communal nests
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: is thatch building costly?
yes. it requires time & effort
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: possible fitness benefits of direct (selfish) nests
- own nesting success
- avoiding punishment
- mate attraction
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: possible fitness benefits of indirect (altruistic) nests
-relatives’ nesting success
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if for OWN NESTING SUCCESS ONLY
it would be unstable, because each individual would nebefit more by letting the others work harder
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if to AVOID PUNISHMENT
most individuals would build & punish those that didn’t. However, most individuals did not build and weren’t punished
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if to ATTRACT MALES
should beamingly done by young, unpaired birds, but most builders were older birds
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if for RELATIVES NESTING SUCCESS
males should contribute more, because they are more closely related to fellow members of their colony
Thatch-building in sociable weavers: TRUE RESULT:
89% of thatch built by males. Also, males were more likely to build when they were more closely related to their neighbours.
Supports role for INDIRECT BENEFITS in driving thatch-building behaviour.
Sociable weavers gain some direct benefits from thatch-building. However, this is not enough to drive the behaviour alone, because it would favour freeloaders who gained the benefits without doing the work. Individuals with close relatives as neighbours gain both direct and indirect benefits, and so are more likely to invest in building.
== indirect kin-selected benefits are likely to have been important in the evolution of thatch-building.
most benefits associated with group living are
selfish ones, to its own adv, promoting on genes into next generation
example of altruistic behaviour:
- group living birds, failed own breeding attempt as lost eggs/chick will help others out, as allo parents
- many other organisms show complex and unselfish behaviours - grooming, feeding others offspring etc
if natural selection favours individuals that survive bested have most surviving young, how can a behaviour involve which helps others have more young at cost of helper own chances
in 1960s william hamilton, realised individuals can pass their genes onto next generation indirectly through relatives as well as through their own. = KIN SELECTION
probability of parent & offspring sharing a gene
known as COEFFICIENT OF RELATEDNESS (r) & = 0.5 (50%)
brothers and sisters probability of sharing same gene is
also coefficient of relatedness = 0.5
what is INDIVIDUAL or DIRECT selection =
a behavioural act favoured by selection that involves parents and offspring (fitness gain via personal reproduction = direct fitness)
what is KIN SELECTION or INDIRECT selection
a behavioural act favoured due to it beneficial effect on non-descendant kin
(fitness gain via helping non-descendant kin = indirect fitness )
an individuals total contribution of evens to the next generation - those conferred directly plus indirectly - is its
INCLUSIVE FITNESS
why we find animals living in group, tend to be groups of related individuals
under what conditions should “altruism” be selected for?
rB>C where B= benefits C = costs r = coefficient of relatedness