Lecture 9: Social Behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

Costs of group living:

A
  • more competition for resources (e.g. food, mates)
  • more conspicuous to predators
  • susceptible to parasites (incl. brood parasites) & disease
  • conspecifics may kill offspring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

benefits of group living:

A
  • improved foraging efficiency
  • less chance of being predated (dilution and confusion effects)
  • improved defence of resources from non-group members
  • communal care of offspring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Costs of group living in cliff swallows;

A
  • they breed in colonies & suffer from a blood-sucking parasitic bug
  • more bugs per nest in larger colonies
  • the more bugs a chick has on it, the slower it grows
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

experiment to look into whether ‘do bugs cause chicks to grow slower?’ with cliff swallowed

A

Mary & Charles Brown fumigated half the nests in a colony to see whether this improved chick growth.

IT DID, providing evidence to infer causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Benefits of group living in guillemots

A
  • they breed at higher densities than any other bird, up to 70 individuals/m2.
  • WHY? what is the adaptive significance of breeding in such close proximity?
  • -> breeding success increases with group density, = more neighbours = greater safety from predatory gulls
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

animal lifestyles types:

A
  • solaritary like moose

- social bird groups described

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why do guillemots allopreen or groom each other?

A
  • reduce parasite burden?
  • reduces stress (important in these tightly packed conditions)
  • build relationships that reduce local competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does unselfish behaviour evolve?

A

individuals can gain fitness through success of relatives. Can drive altuirstic behaviour. Bill (william) Hamiltons theory of kin selection/inclusive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: how many birds live together

A

500 birds in huge communal nests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: is thatch building costly?

A

yes. it requires time & effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: possible fitness benefits of direct (selfish) nests

A
  • own nesting success
  • avoiding punishment
  • mate attraction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: possible fitness benefits of indirect (altruistic) nests

A

-relatives’ nesting success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if for OWN NESTING SUCCESS ONLY

A

it would be unstable, because each individual would nebefit more by letting the others work harder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if to AVOID PUNISHMENT

A

most individuals would build & punish those that didn’t. However, most individuals did not build and weren’t punished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if to ATTRACT MALES

A

should beamingly done by young, unpaired birds, but most builders were older birds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: if for RELATIVES NESTING SUCCESS

A

males should contribute more, because they are more closely related to fellow members of their colony

17
Q

Thatch-building in sociable weavers: TRUE RESULT:

A

89% of thatch built by males. Also, males were more likely to build when they were more closely related to their neighbours.

Supports role for INDIRECT BENEFITS in driving thatch-building behaviour.

Sociable weavers gain some direct benefits from thatch-building. However, this is not enough to drive the behaviour alone, because it would favour freeloaders who gained the benefits without doing the work. Individuals with close relatives as neighbours gain both direct and indirect benefits, and so are more likely to invest in building.
== indirect kin-selected benefits are likely to have been important in the evolution of thatch-building.

18
Q

most benefits associated with group living are

A

selfish ones, to its own adv, promoting on genes into next generation

19
Q

example of altruistic behaviour:

A
  • group living birds, failed own breeding attempt as lost eggs/chick will help others out, as allo parents
  • many other organisms show complex and unselfish behaviours - grooming, feeding others offspring etc
20
Q

if natural selection favours individuals that survive bested have most surviving young, how can a behaviour involve which helps others have more young at cost of helper own chances

A

in 1960s william hamilton, realised individuals can pass their genes onto next generation indirectly through relatives as well as through their own. = KIN SELECTION

21
Q

probability of parent & offspring sharing a gene

A

known as COEFFICIENT OF RELATEDNESS (r) & = 0.5 (50%)

22
Q

brothers and sisters probability of sharing same gene is

A

also coefficient of relatedness = 0.5

23
Q

what is INDIVIDUAL or DIRECT selection =

A

a behavioural act favoured by selection that involves parents and offspring (fitness gain via personal reproduction = direct fitness)

24
Q

what is KIN SELECTION or INDIRECT selection

A

a behavioural act favoured due to it beneficial effect on non-descendant kin
(fitness gain via helping non-descendant kin = indirect fitness )

25
Q

an individuals total contribution of evens to the next generation - those conferred directly plus indirectly - is its

A

INCLUSIVE FITNESS

why we find animals living in group, tend to be groups of related individuals

26
Q

under what conditions should “altruism” be selected for?

A
rB>C 
where 
B= benefits 
C = costs 
r = coefficient of relatedness