Lecture 8: Communication Flashcards

1
Q

communication is

A

transfer of information from a signaller to a receiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

communication can use..

A

CUES (not adapted) e.g. body heat + pheromones to attract mosquitos
or SIGNALS (adapted)
e.g. peacocks visual display

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

signals can use one of 5 sensory modalities

A

1) Visual
2) Acoustic
3) Chemical
4) Mechanical
5) Electrical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

communication uses one sensory modality at any one time. T/F

A

Communication may use multiple sensory modalities to convey a message e.g. chicks in a nest begging for food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what four process’ may affect how signals evolve?

A

1) Evolutionary history and constraint – what is the animal capable of doing? What pre-existing behaviours can be adapted to produce signals?
2) Ecological context – what signals are appropriate?
3) Sensory bias – are receivers more responsive to a certain kind of signal?
4) Costs and benefits – like any other adaptation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evolutionary history and constraint affect on signal evolution: IN GANNETS

A

similarities between behaviours suggest that courtship displays evolved from pre-flight ‘intention movements’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evolutionary history and constraint affect on signal evolution: IN PELECANIFORMES

A

species in this order have more similar courtship postures when they are more closely related. This suggests there is constraint to the evolution of this behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ecological context affect on signal evolution

A

The environment broadly determines which types of signal are appropriate, e.g. visual signals not appropriate in total darkness.

It also exerts fine-scale selection on the ‘design’ of signals, e.g. the structure of birdsong in rural and urban environments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sensory bias affect on signal evolution

A

Signals may evolve because they are favoured by a pre-existing bias in the receiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sensory bias affect on signal evolution: Fiddler crab

A

John Christy – female fiddler crabs of both species are attracted to the ‘hood’ structures built by male U. musica. In fact, they are attracted to any prominent structure (also wood, stones, shells).

Suggests female fiddler crabs may have a pre-existing sensory bias that makes them attracted to hoods. This would then drive the evolution of hood building in males.
(USED BY FEMALES AS PROTECTION, BUT MALES AS COURTSHIP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where do sensory biases come from?

A
  • Random drift?
  • Interest in a novel, obvious and prominent behaviour?
  • Or an adaptive basis?
  • –>Evidence – female fiddler crabs are attracted to hoods even when they aren’t sexually receptive. The hoods provide them protection from predators.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cost & benefit affect on signals evolution

A

common trade off is being attractive to sexual partners and being visible to predators. e.g. Guppies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

signaller and receiver generally have the same….however can be …

A

BROAD INTERESTS.
Example 1: male displaying to female – both individuals aiming to find a mate.
Example 2: chicks begging for food from parents, who are aiming to feed them.

However, there is often conflict in the communication process.
Example 1: optimal for male if female mates with him, optimal for female to mate with best male possible.
Example 2: optimal for each chick to demand more food than its siblings, optimal for parents to feed them equally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 points to do with conflict between signaller & receiver

A

1) coevolutionary arms races
2) stable honesty
3) understanding deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

coevolutionary arms races between signaller and receiver

A

MANIPULATION BY SIGNALLER: receiver is deceived into behaving in a way that benefits signaller –> RESISTANCE FROM RECEIVER: receiver ignores the deceptive signal –>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

stable honesty between signaller & receiver

A

‘Honest signals’ that accurately communicate information are evolutionarily stable solutions to these unstable arms races.

Receivers will be selected to ignore cues until they accurately communicate information. Therefore even though manipulation may be adaptive for signallers, it is generally unstable.

In which case, why does manipulation/deception occur in nature?

17
Q

understanding deception between signaller & receiver

A

Deception may be transient i.e. we may be observing ongoing arms races, before receivers evolve resistance and signals become honest.

or

Deception may be stable at low frequencies if responding to a signal usually benefits the receiver.

Meerkat & drone bird, bird mimics meerkat warning call so they burrow & hide, meaning it steals their food