Lecture 9: Sentencing Flashcards
[5] Purposes of Sentencing
- Punishment: Make the person pay for their crime.
- Deterrence: Prevent the person (and others) from committing crimes.
- Protection: Remove dangerous people from society.
- Rehabilitation: Help people change & reintegrate into society.
- Accountability: Encourage people to take responsibility.
Do Longer Sentences Reduce Crime? [2]
- Research shows longer sentences do not lower reoffending rates.
- People given shorter sentences reoffend less than those given long ones.
Why don’t harsher punishments alone not work to reduce crime? [3]
- Many crimes are impulsive, not planned.
- Mental illness & substance use affect decision-making.
- Prison isolates people from positive influences.
Capital Punishment (Death Penalty) [3]
- Used in some countries, but Canada abolished it.
- No evidence that it reduces crime.
- Murder rates are not lower in places with the death penalty.
Restorative Justice (Alternative to Prison) [5]
- Focuses on healing rather than punishment.
- Brings together the victim, offender, and community.
- Offender must admit guilt and try to repair the harm.
- Often used for youth & non-violent crimes.
- Studies show lower reoffending rates after participation.
What two crime categories are most frequently processed through adult criminal courts? [2]
- crimes against the person
- crimes against property
What is the goal of the Gladue Principles (For Indigenous Sentencing) and the problem? [2]
- Goal: Reduce overrepresentation of Indigenous people in prison.
- Problem: Not used enough & some judges still give harsh sentences.
What are the Gladue Principles? [2]
- set of legal principles in Canada that require judges to consider the unique circumstances of Indigenous offenders during sentencing
- Looks at factors like: residential schools, poverty, racism, family issues.
Gladue Courts (Special Indigenous Courts) [3]
- Created to apply Gladue principles properly.
- Include Indigenous elders & translators.
- Focus on restorative justice instead of jail.
What is the difference between aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing? [2]
- Aggravating factors are elements of a crime that can increase sentence severity, such as violence or the use of a weapon.
- Mitigating factors are those that may decrease a sentence’s severity, such as the offender’s youth, remorse, or mental illness.
Explain the “rational choice model” of crime, and how this theory relates to the effectiveness of punishment. [3]
- suggests that people weigh the pros and cons of committing a crime
- theory does not fully account for the “here and now” mindset or other factors like mental illness
- suggesting that punishment may not always deter individuals from crime
[3] potential limitations or challenges of using restorative justice practices
- participation is voluntary, which can result in selection bias
- not available in all regions and may be inconsistently applied.
- restorative justice may not always be suitable for severe violent crimes.
What is the best approach when sentencing? [1]
A balanced approach combining rehabilitation, restorative justice, and proportional sentencing.