Lecture 9: Gender Dimensions of Peace and Security Flashcards
3 focuses of liberal feminism
- Making women visible in security
- How security measures affect women differently than men
- Equal representation of women in global security studying
Core argument of liberal feminism
The functioning of the international relies on the private division of labor (e.g. unpaid domestic work of wives of military men contributes to global security and diplomatic interests and careers)
Main goal of liberal feminism
Making women visible
3 limitations of the liberal feminist approach
- No critique of the positivist foundation of realist theories
- “Add women and stir” (doesn’t go beyond realism)
- Essentializes women’s identities
3 focuses of standpoint feminism
- How does security look from a female perspective? How are their experiences of security different from men’s?
- Redefining through a feminist lense the ways in which we understand security
- The perspective of women add something new and different to security
The core argument of standpoint feminism
The distinction between the “international” and the “domestic” relies on gendered assumptions, tropes, and metaphors
The international is defined in words like strength, power, autonomy, independence, rationality, whereas the domestic is defined like weakness, naiveté, irrationality
2 Main goals of standpoint feminism
- Include women’s experiences to transform global politics
- Understand the history of exclusion and de-valorization of women in global politics (why did it happen?)
3 implications of standpoint feminism for studying security?
- Behavior in the domestic and the international sphere are inseparable (the brave soldier depends on the idea of a vulnerable woman in need of protection=
- Identity is important, and inclusion of women’s views might lead to a less militarized state identity and more peaceful relations between states
- Gender equality is important for global security (human insecurity often has gendered origins)
2 limitations of standpoint feminism
- Are there “authentic” female views and experiences across time, space, and culture? Can we generalize about women or would this reinforce gendered view of security?
- Can there truly be a “non-gendered” discipline?
2 focuses of post-structural gender approaches
- Understanding gender as a category
- How is the concept of men and women socially constructed and can be fluid? How does shifting perceptions change security?
Core argument of post-structural gender approaches
Our viewpoints are never “neutral” and always “gendered”. We always speak from dominant assumptions about masculinity and femininity
Definition: gendering
Assigning characteristics of masculinity and femininity to certain phenomena
2 main goals of post-structural gender approaches
- Deconstruct gender and sex categories
- Critically engage with the consequences of gendered global politics (e.g. how national security reproduces hierarchies and structural violence against people it claims to protect)
Limitation of the post-structural gender approach
How can we pursue change if we can’t speak for “women”? Can lead to exclusion of women and reproduction of inequalities
When women are included in peace processes…
There is a 35% increase in the probability of an agreement lasting at least 15 years