Lecture 1: What is global security? Flashcards

1
Q

Definition: Security (Wolfers)

A

Security, in an objective sense, measures the absence of threats to acquired values…

In a subjective sense the absence of fear that such values will be attacked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is security a contested concept? 4 questions

A

Which values need protection?
What counts as a threat to values?
Is security absolute?
According to who?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Narrow vs. broad definition of security

A

Narrow: Survival (freedom from life-determining threats)

Broad: Survival-plus (freedom to have life choices)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What needs to be made secure? Traditional vs. alternative

A

Traditional: The state, national interest (of whom?)

Could also be individuals, ethnic groups, society as a whole, the environment, the planet

Not necessarily independent of each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Buzan’s 5 key dimensions of security

A
  1. Military (offensive/defensive capabilities and consequences)
  2. Political (state stability, systems of government)
  3. Economic (resources, welfare)
  4. Social sustainability (maintenance of traditions and customs)
  5. Environmental sustainability (maintenance of local and planetary biosphere)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Perception of security depends on

A

Priorities which can be socially constructed and evolve over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

At beginning of 2023, there are increasing perceptions of these 2

A
  1. Political polarization within countries
  2. Threats to democracy, within countries and internationally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Matrix of security: Security for states, source of security threat is military

A

National security (conventional realist approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Matrix of security: security for states, source of security threat is military and/or nonmilitary

A

Redefined security (environmental and economic security)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Matrix of security: security for societies/groups/individuals, source of security threat is military

A

Intrastate security (civil war, ethnic conflict, democide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Matrix of security: security for societies/groups/individuals, source of security threat is military and/or nonmilitary

A

Human security (environmental and economic threats to the survival of societies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do people feel about UN solving security problems?

A

Decreasing positivity in some countries, increasing in others; highest positivity in young people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is there a way to achieve absolute/perfect security? 3 points

A

There are always trade-offs - in order to achieve security, you must trade off something else

Achieveing perfect security can create security problems (security dilemma)

Society values other than security such as justice, free economic systems etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

6 points about the Golden Age of Security Studies

A
  1. 1950-1960
  2. Heavy focus on military development
  3. Influenced by WW1 and 2 to develop long-term strategy to avoid war as well as focus on civilian contributions
  4. National interest first (security rather than welfare)
  5. Focus on nuclear revolution and terms related to it: deterrence, containment, coercion, escalation, arms control
  6. Belief in deductive, rational thinking, but hypothetical research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

6 points about the end of the Golden Age of Security Studies

A
  1. 1960-1970
  2. Discovering limits to traditional approaches (only military focus, assumption of perfect information and rational calculations)
  3. Public disinterest in national security because of Vietnam War
  4. Focus on international political economy
  5. Oil price shocks in 1970s important for security
  6. Peripheral war, insurgencies, massive civil wars
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 (possible) Changes in the field of security studies after the end of the cold war

A
  1. Civil wars turned into “new wars” defined by civilian targets, criminalization of violence, identity-based wars (instead of ideology)
  2. Question of whether international wars has turned into hybrid wars or grey-zone warfare?
  3. Strong disagreement among researchers on whether there has actually been a change in civil and international wars
17
Q

Changes to the field of securit studies after 9/11?

A
  1. Greater international interventionism?
  2. Conflicts are more complex and multi-layered?
  3. Growth in multi-party conflicts?
  4. Possible challenges to post-Cold War unipolar balance of power?
18
Q

6 Different approaches and what they focus on

A
  1. Realism: military security, deterrence
  2. Liberalism: institutions, intra-state war
  3. Constructivism: national interests, identities, culture
  4. Critical security studies: borders, migration, surveillance
  5. Feminism: gender in war and peace
  6. Post-colonial studies: development, economic security, regional security
19
Q

Problem-solving theory vs. critical theory

A

Problem-solving theory takes the world as it finds it (social and power relationships, institutions is framework for action)

Critical theory calls institutions and social/power relations into question

20
Q

Main argument of reading: After the return to theory: the past, present and future of security studies - Waever and Buzan

A

Post-Cold War era has seen renewed focus on theoretical development and a move away from traditional security concerns towards globalization, human security, and environmental challenges. Field needs to keep developing new theoretical frameworks and engage with diverse perspectives