lecture 9 Flashcards
what is word of mouth marketing
consumers interest in a companys product or service is reflected in their daily dialogues
organic word of mouth
People become advocates for a product and have a desire to share their views
THIS IS OUR FOCUS
Ampliefied word of mouth
Marketers launch campaigns designed to encourage or accelerate WoM in existing or new communities
social media word of mouth matters
consumers now spend more than 135 minutes per day on social media
Social media fostered growing importance of WoM marketing
Chief marketing officers think online WoM matters
Rationalized by ocnsumers trust in online info from peers
64% of marketing executives believe word of mouth is the most effective form of marketing
only 6% say they have mastered it
Mechanisms at play (word of mouth might matter)
1) awareness
2) Buzz
3) social learning
4) Consumption complementarities
Most often we see this operationalized as
Awareness & buzz –> volume of tweets
Social learning -> sentiment in tweets text
Sentiment often called valence
Consumption complementarities –> nothing
Social media can generate awareness, buzz and information diffusion that ultimately influences demand. This is important when
1) relying on “hyped release strategies”
2) Uncertainty about a products quality
valence (aka sentiment)
how positive/negative the reviews are
Why is “how does volume, valence and variance of online user reviews impact product demand?
volume vs valence effects are widely debated
(generally) hard to measure
Relevant for new products, experience goods
Movie industry is a good laboratory for these products
Takeaway from valence vs volume paper
emphasize the role of valence/sentiment of online reviews in influencing new product demand in experience goods markets
In contrast to volue
Which is what previous studies emphasized
Marketers should find ways to spread positive online WoM to boost demand
virality
achieving a large number of views in a short time period due to consumers sharing content online
What do marketers and managers care about virality
ability to reach vast audiences in a short period of time at a low cost
Increases brand visibility and recognition –> brand equity
INcrease in sales
Lurking differences: seeded virality vs non-seeded virality
ads are more likely to be shared when
they are creative and informative
Even more liekly for more socially connected individuals
Driven by socially connected individuals desire to elevate (perceived) social status
emotional ads
increase sharing
Informative ads
increase brand evaluation and purchase intention
Emotional (brand) integral ads combine both effects (emotional, informative)
This is the value virality the authors care about
They argue this is by
(a) creating positive inferences about persuasion and
(b) increasing brand knowledge
(…but I cant see a competing story being thoroughly tested)