Lecture 8 Power and Promise of DNA. Flashcards

1
Q

LAST LECTURE - TAKEAWAYS

A

6 pathways of plant domestication

Cereal pathway – adaptive introgression
Weed pathway – Vavilovian mimicry

Tuber pathway – high phenotypic plasticity

Ecosystem engineering – landscape management rather than ‘domestication’

Fruit tree pathway – propagation through layering, sucker removal, stem cutting and
grafting

Directed fiber pathway – prior knowledge of cereal domestication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

REVIEW OF GENETICS

A

Genome: the complete set of inheritable genetic material of an organism

  • Genes (coding DNA– 3%) – units of heredity - component of gnome
  • Non-coding sequences (97%) contain most genetic variation between groups and individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

NUCLEAR GENOMES
(nDNA)

A
  • Pairs of chromosomes (autosomes, sex chromosomes)
  • Inherited from both parents
  • Undergoes recombination
  • NRY: Non-recombining area of the Y (sex) chromosome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
(mtDNA)

A
  • 37 genes and non-coding DNA
  • ~1000 mitochondria in each cell
  • Circular genome
  • Non-recombinant - stable gene component
  • Used to track maternal lineages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GENETIC ANALYSIS IN DOMESTICATION STUDIES

A

 Analyze similarities and differences across the genomes(differences between wild and domesticated species)

 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

GENETIC ANALYSIS IN DOMESTICATION STUDIES

A

 mtDNA for phylogenetic analysis
(i.e., evolutionary relationships)

 nDNA usually required to track:
- Gene flow
- Genetic drift
- Bottlenecks
- Reproductive isolation
- Artificial selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DNA GLOSSARY

A

Phylogenetics: Study of evolutionary relationships among groups of organisms (three like diagram)

Phylogeography: historical processes responsible for the geographic distributions of individuals

Nuclear DNA/Genome: DNA contained within a nucleus of eukaryotic (cells have a nucleus) organisms, with information from both parents (recombinant)

Mitochondrial DNA: Maternally inherited DNA located in mitochondria (non- recombinant)

Regulatory gene: A gene involved in controlling the expression of one or more other genes (important for epigenetic)

Quantitative Trait Loci: Stretches of DNA containing or linked to the genes that underlie a quantitative trait (typically vary along a gradient/spectrum) ex: fur color

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

WHY DNA IS SO POWERFUL?

A
  • to track wild phenotypes and domestic phenotype
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WHY DNA IS SO POWERFUL?

A

Genetic change often precedes morphological changes visible in the archaeological record.

Provides insight into the early stages of domestication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TRADITIONAL APPROACHES

A

 Geographic centres of diversity or wild progenitor range identified as origin of domestication (Vavilovian approach)

 Primarily based on earliest archaeological evidence or on morphological evidence

✔May be valid for species with a restricted geographic range (e.g., teosinte)

✘ Difficult for widely distributed species (e.g., grey wolf) or when animals are domesticated on the periphery of range

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Genetic approch

A
  • compare DNA from domestic population to various wild populations and assess their evolutionary relationships(Phylogeography)
  • traditionally focused on mitchondrial DNA
  • now-
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PROGENITOR OF SW DOMESTIC TURKEY

A

 Who is the progenitor of the
Southwest domestic turkey?
- Local wild turkey stocks?
- Imported from Mexico?

 Analysis of modern wild turkey
mtDNA and extinct domestic
turkey DNA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results

A

 SW turkey is distinct from Mexican turkeys

 Also distinct from local wild turkeys

 Wild progenitor populations still unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LESSON 1(cons of genetic reserch)

A

Modern wild populations have
complex histories and it may be impossible to identify progenitor
populations based on modern DNA alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

example

WHERE & HOW
MANY TIMES
WERE PIGS
DOMESTICATED?

A

 Extensive archaeological evidence for domestic pigs across Eurasia

 DNA analysis of modern
wild and domestic pigs worldwide, suggested at least 6 different independent centers of domestication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NOW WITH ANCIENT DNA…

A

 DNA analysis of archaeological pigs in Europe and Near East reveals extensive gene flow

  1. Near Eastern domestic pigs are
    introduced to Europe ~5,500BC
  2. Domestic pigs interbreed extensively with European wild boars (gene flow)
  3. ‘European’ domestic pigs return to
    Near East ca. 700BC.
17
Q

ADAPTIVE INTROGRESSION

A

 Gene flow between wild and domestic populations that increases diversity, facilitates adaptions to various environments, and/or increases the fitness of the recipient population.
- e.g., gene flow from European aurochs and wild boar into introduced domestic populations.

 Gene flow can be difficult to differentiate from independent domestication events

18
Q

Lesson 2 (cons)

A

 There is frequently gene
flow (introgression) between introduced domestic populations and
local wild animals.

Without ancient DNA
analysis, this introgression can be mistaken for an independent
domestication event

19
Q

MOLECULAR CLOCK

A

 Regular rate of random DNA mutations

 Estimate divergence times between taxa

try ro understand when domestication happened - as precise as it cans

20
Q

DOG/WOLF MOLECULAR CLOCK

A
  1. mtDNA set divergence at
    ~135,000BP (too old!)
  2. Full genome analysis set date at
    11,000–16,000BP (too recent!)
  3. Ancient genome study suggests
    60,000-20,000 BP (just right?)
    Frantz et al. 2016. Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs. Science 352, 1228–1231.
21
Q

LESSON 3

A

 DNA mutation rates can differ by orders of magnitudes

 Different DNA loci can produce wildly different results

 Best scaled for divergences >1mya

22
Q

TIMING OF MAIZE DOMESTICATION

A

 Archaeological evidence for maize
domestication10,000-6,250 BP in S. Mexico

 Genome sequence of a 5,310-year-old maize cob, modern teosinte and maize landraces

 Similar to modern maize, but with several ancestral traits (mosaic)

 Suggests slow, gradual adoption of
domestication syndrome.

23
Q

LESSON 4

A

Ancient DNA analysis of intermediate forms can (sometimes) be useful for tracking the timing of domestication
and the strength of artificial selection

24
Q

helpful to written

THE AGE OF CLONES

A

 Grape vines are vegetatively propagated, producing clonal varieties for wine

 DNA of 28 grape seeds from archaeological sites in France

 Roman grapes closely related to cultivars used for winemaking today: syrah, pinot noir

 One ~1100AD grape was identical to
modern ‘Savagnin Blanc’

there is a citation in the slide

25
REVIEW OF DOMESTICATION SYNDROME: **Plants**
1. Loss of seed dispersal (non-dehiscent) 2. Loss of grain dispersal aids (awns, hooks) 3. Increase in seed size and number 4. Plant architecture (apical dominance) 5. Timing of reproduction (simultaneous germination and ripening)
26
REVIEW OF DOMESTICATION SYNDROME: **Animals**
1. Reduced aggression 2. Earlier sexuality maturity 3. Changes in cranial morphology 4. Changes in body proportions 5. Changes in coat color 6. Floppy ears, rolled tails
27
GENOME WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES
Observational study of a genome-wide set of genetic variants in different individuals to see if any variant is associated with a trait
28
DOMESTICATION GENES
 **teosinte glume architecture 1 (tga1)**: Gene disrupting the formation of hardened fruitcase in maize compared to teosinte.  **teosinte branched1 (tb1):** Gene dictating a difference in plant architecture (long branches vs. short lateral branches)
29
LESSON 5
 Parallel evolution is common  **Mutations occur in similar genes across multiple species**  Sh1 gene mutations for shattering in rice, maize and sorghum  Tb1 gene mutations for branching in maize, pearl millet, barley
30
REDUCED WARINESS
 Why does the domestic chicken show reduced fearfulness, increased stress tolerance than Red Junglefowl?  Study examined studying adrenal gene expression in domestic and wild fowl  Changes in the expression of several minor regulatory genes rather than **changes in the expression of critical steroidogenic adrenal genes**
31
CHANGES IN PIGMENTATION
 Coat colour in animals is controlled by a few well-known mutations (SNPs)  MC1R, KIT
32
COAT COLOUR AND HORSE DOMESTICATION
Black and bay horses in ‘pre- domestic’ time periods, few archaeological horse bones. vs Rapid increase in coat colouration in Siberia and E. Europe ca. 5,000BP (Chestnut, Cream, Silver, Sabino,
33
LESSON 6
 Since melanin, dopamine and adrenaline are part of the same biochemical pathway, then tracking changes in coat colour can be a **simple way to track genetically more complex changes in corticosteroids**.
34
DNA analysis has identified genes for:
 Body size  Body weight  Life span  Aggressiveness  Length of fur  Fur colour  Furnishings  Leg length  Ancestry & Breed  Disease risk  Etc...
35
COST OF DOMESTICATION
Analysis of modern and ancient horse genomes reveal increase in deleterious mutations in domestic horses compared to wild horses
36
LESSON 7
 Genomic analysis of modern and ancient domestic animals are **revealing specific mutations relating to phenotypic traits, including those resulting from artificial selection** at various points in the domestication process.
37
DUAL DOMESTICATION OF THE HORSE
 Horses previously thought to be domesticated under the ‘Directed’ pathway in Botai, Kazakhstan around ~5,500 BP.  New genetic evidence suggests two domestications of horses - 1st domestication: at Botai; Prey pathways (meat and milk) - 2nd domestication: Pontic steppes, Directed pathways (mobility)
38
SUMMARY OF GENETIC APPROACHES
 DNA can address many questions in domestication  Only as good as the biological and genome samples available  Wild populations have changed a lot since early Holocene: need ancient DNA!  DNA cannot always distinguish between independent domestications and gene flow from new wild populations  Recent breeding programs have significantly modified domestic populations