Lecture 8 - Experimental design Flashcards
(!) Describe experiments in general
General:
- RCT = Golden standard
- Determine causal relations: DV vs. IV
- Important ethical consideration
- Complete control: Same group to different treatments
RCT:
- Randomization: Reduce selection bias
- Controlled environment: Other variables
- Treatment/manipulation: IV´s
Randomized selection / trials:
- Two comparable groups
- Samples from same population
- Larger samples = Closer to population
- Sample approx. same demographic mix as population
(!) Describe experiments in general, when to use it, choices to be made & pitfalls
General:
- Causality > Generalization
- Internal > External validity
When to use it:
- Poss. Randomization
- Poss. Manipulation of IV´s
- Good proxies: Isolate interesting effect
- Poss. Simulation in lab: Eg. Attitudes
- Marketing & leadership
When not to use:
- Complex, multicomponent, nonlinear phenomena
- Long-term macro-level phenomena
Choices to be made:
- Lab, field, quasi or natural experiment
- Pretest & manipulation checks
- Blinding subject
- Between & within-subjects designs
- Crossed or nested design
- Control variable or treatment?
Pitfalls:
- Self-selection bias
- Expensive
- Time-consuming
- Ethical?
- Reliable participants?
(!) Describe considerations of using the same person again
Effect of maturing:
- Tired & bored of doing same task
Learning effect:
- Learning from first attempt
Placebo effect
- Mindset change figuring out what experiment is about
- Change in expectation change outcome
(!) Describe categories of experiments
Conventional lab experiment:
- Representative subject pool
- Abstract framing
- Often far from reality
- Limited time-span
- Low ecological validity
- Easier to isolate effect
- Easier randomization
Artefactual field experiment:
- Same as lab exp. but real employees as subject pool
- Limited time-span
Framed field experiment:
- Field context in task
- Actually doing the task.
Natural field experiment:
- Subject naturally undertake task
- Dont know they participate: Ref. Hawthorne
- Poss. Combined with action research
- Close to practise
- Time-span can be longer: (Never 2 years in lab)
- Difficult randomization
- Difficult to isolate effect
- High ecological validity
(!) Describe the vignette experiment
General:
- Hypothetical setting
- Story w. character described by 3 infos
- Randomly assign option for each descriptor
- Randomly assign profile to respondent
Benefits:
- Internal validity
- External validity
- Can combine survey data
Describe the quasi experiment & other ways to make randomization
Quasi-experiment:
- As close to random as poss.
- Compare regression w. non-received treatment
- Often compared with secondary data before & after
Matching:
- Produced backward
- Select control group when treatment already applied
- Match control group to characteristics of treatment group