Lecture 8 Flashcards

1
Q

Sensitivity

A

The ability of a test to correctly detect a condition.
True positive.

True positive / True positive + False negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Specificity

A

The ability of a test to exclude subjects without the condition. True negatives.

True negative / True negative + False positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 tests that make statement about the test in general

A

Sensitivity and specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2 tests that makes a statement about what a test means to the patient

A

Positive and negative predictive value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Positive predictive value

A

Probability of having the condition when testing positive.

True positive / True positive + False positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negative predictive value

A

Probability of not having the condition when testing negative

True negative / True negative + False negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Accuracy

A

The proportion of all tests providing the correct result

True positive + true negative / All

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Likelihood ratio of a positive test

A

Odds of a disease if the test result is positive

Sensitivity / 1 - specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Likelihood ratio of a negative test

A

Odds of a disease if the test is negative

1- sensitivity / Specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

10 questions to evaluate a paper claiming to validate a diagnostic or screening test

A
  1. Is the test relevant to clinical practice?
  2. Has it been compared with the gold standard?
  3. Was an appropriate spectrum of participants included?
    - PPV/NPV are dependent on prevalence.
  4. Verification bias avoided?
    - Confirm all subjects were tested with both the gold standard and the new test.
  5. Was expectation bias avoided?
    - Do this by blinding the interpreter of the tests.
  6. Test reproducible both within and between observers ?
    - Intra observations: same observer, same result.
    - Inter observations: different observers, same results
  7. What are the test features?
    - Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV
  8. Were confidence intervals provided?
  9. Normal range derived from results?
  10. Has the test been placed in the context of other similar tests?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intra observations vs inter observations

A

Intra: Same observer, same result.

inter: Different observer, same result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Confidence interval

A

Possible range of results within which the true value will lie.

Ideal: narrow and based on large sample size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens to the CI with a small sample size?

A

CI will be sensitive to small changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Variables (parameters)

A

What we are measuring or manipulating in a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Two types of variables

A

Numeric - continuous and discrete

Categorical (non numerical)- ordinal and nominal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Continuous variable (branch off numeric)

A

One that takes on an infinite number of values in a certain range.
Ex: distance, temp, time, some biomarkers.

17
Q

Discrete variable (branch off numeric)

A

Countable whole number. Ex: 10 people in the room. Not 10.5

18
Q

Dichotomous variable (apart of categorical nominal)

A

only have 2 values.
Male-female
Employed- non employed

19
Q

Ordinal (apart of categorical)

A

Distance between categories is unknown.
Usually questionnaires use this.
Ex: Leikert scale.

20
Q

Likelihood ratio

A

Ratio of the likelihood of a test result in one with disease to likelihood of the same test result in one without the disease.

Preferred way of expressing and comparing the usefulness of different tests.

Defines risk of actually having the condition.
Useful for continuous variables.
Calculated using sensitivity and specificity.

21
Q

Likelihood ratio is calculated using

A

Sensitivity and specificity

22
Q

Likelyhood ratio defines ____ of having the condition

A

Risk

23
Q

Clinical prediction

A

Numerical estimate of chance of person having or developing disease. Can use likelihood ratio to compare pre-test probability to post-test probability.

24
Q

Three stages of developing a clinical prediction rule (standard of care)

A
  1. Establish indecent and combined effects of symptoms, signs, and diagnostic tests.
  2. Assess explanatory variables above in different populations to be more generalizable.
  3. RCT to assess the impact on patient outcomes applying the rule. Most critical part.
25
Q

ROC graphically evaluates what?

A

The trade offs between sensitivity (y is sensitivity) and specificity (x is 1-specificity)

26
Q

When looking at ROC graph, how do you know what the overall accuracy of ability of a test to distinguish between two groups?

A

Look at AUC.

27
Q

Ideal ROC graph

A

in upper left corner. AUC= 1.00

28
Q

Line of no difference in ROC graph

A

AUC guessing = 50%

29
Q

Grading ROC AUC

A
90-100: excellent A
80-90: Good B
70-80: Fair C
60-70: Poor D
50-60: Fail F
30
Q

Bland-Altman PLots

A

Graphical analysis process used to assess agreement between two methods of measurement.

Requires 2 methods measuring the same characteristic with the same scale.

When plotted, the points should line up along the line of equality (y=x)

31
Q

Bland Altman compared to correlation plots

A

Not the same. Bland Altman compares the same characteristics with same scale.

Correlation compares two different characteristics on different scales.

32
Q

Name of difference vs mean plot

A

Bland Altman