Lecture 7: Climate change impacts and mitigation Flashcards
great big gap over africa
don’t know really whats going on
need centres in the middle of africa
attribution
1990s - couldn’t say if anthropengenic drivers- causing them
emissions
asias- increasing the most
economies collapse- good for emissions- ussr 2008 financial crash
sector- energy usage- going up- methane- farming bog- marshes- permafrost - actually a big problem
decarbonising the economy
4 things to consider
1 size of pop
2GDp per capita
3Energy intensity of GDP
4Carbon intensity of energy
increase in gdp-more energy density
diff aprroaches- climate change act
2008
law
not funding renewable energy
diff approaches- climate change governance
2 degree target- highly political tackle climate change reduce emissions what do we do post kyoto paris- success- copenhagen failure
intended nationally determined contributions
get green house gases down
look at global temp rise
carbon capture/storage
produce the carbon- instead of emitting- suck them back in
polycentric governance
many actors on many levels contributing to solutions
negative- weak may have lost strength
more centralised governments
changing behaviour
discount the future- ethics our rights more important than theirs
want something cheap fast and something right now
individual may not see that they can make a change
lack of education - link to boy off mass media
theory of planned behaviour
attitude toward the behaviour
intention
perceived behavioural control
types of renewable energy
solar wind geothermal bioenergy hydropower
no deploying more widely- change in norms- norms being the system
not in my back yard- rural don’t want them
non profitable for companies - less economies of scale- price of oil has gone down
neweables and energy sovereignty
north african solar- can power all of europe
don’t want to rely on na- bad trek record
england wind energy- should output this
Reading Boykoff and Boykoff- 2004
June 11 2001- bush spent 18 billion on climate research
us prestige press- contributed- in significant ways to failed discursive translations regarding global warming- denial discourse- a voluble minority- argues gw- not scientifically provable- not a serious issue
individual journalists must content with political economic norms
surface level exploration