Lecture 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Why were people interested in motivation?

A

For social control and boosting production – raise moral of troops, get mor work done by employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Classically, what theories underpinned motivation psychology?

Think before Maslow

What examples of psychologists like this are there?

A

All behaviourist

The theories were mainly based on external reinforcers. No mention of inner sources, all research is predicated on external motivation. All the neo behaviourists fall into this category as do their theories. Kind of like Hall and his equation, Tolman and skinner. All based on external, extrinsic motivation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the opposition to the behaviorist perspective on motivation (Before humanistic psych)?

Think instincts and propensities

Who came up wiuth this (scottish name)

A

But there was opposition. William MacDougall was an evolutionary psychologist. He posits that the main drivers of behaviour are our instincts. In contrast to Watsons basic 3 drives, he says there are more. We have 12 according to him. He called them propensities, and these can be mixed together to create a more complex behaviour. Marital love would be a combination of mating propensity (instinct for sex) and mothering propensity (instinct to protect the young). He was vocal against behaviourism, but his theory was not popular in academia (was in the population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was William MacDougall and what did he think?

What was his theory called?

A

William MacDougall was an evolutionary psychologist. He posits that the main drivers of behaviour are our instincts. In contrast to Watsons basic 3 drives, he says there are more. We have 12 according to him. He called them propensities, and these can be mixed together to create a more complex behaviour

The theory of instincts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can you give an example of a combination of propensities?

A

Marital love would be a combination of mating propensity (instinct for sex) and mothering propensity (instinct to protect the young). He was vocal against behaviourism, but his theory was not popular in academia (was in the population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Was the theory of instincts useful?

If not, what was?

So why did we learn about it?

A

No.
Behaviourism offered a way to control behaviour. You could act on associations and change what people will do. With his theory of instinct, it is not clear what practically we can do if this. He also believed in Lamarckian stuff so even his fellow evo psychologists did not follow him. BUT he is a good example of dissent against the behaviourists in this era of psychology. He was about intrinsic motivation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Abraham Maslo and his theory

A

Abraham Maslow

Proposed that humans are motivated by a hierarchy of needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conceptually, what are Maslow’s needs like and what is the diffference between them?

A

Conceptually, these are like MacDougall’s instincts but they do not have evolutionary connatations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are Maslow’s 2 types of needs and how do they differ

A

Deficiency needs: needs that are going to stir motivation if you lack something. E.g. no food = hunger = motivated for food. Once the need is met, the motivation drops. Then you turn towards something else.

Being (growth) needs. Self-actualization: a need to become who you are, develop the best aspect of yourself. These needs increase as you fulfil them. I.e., what keeps you going after you have the first 4 needs me? The self-actualization needs. They are there all the time, and they keep growing. These needs ever end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is self-actualisation

A

Self-actualisation: the tendency of psychologically healthy people to fulfill their potential in his words, this happens when: “The individual is doing what he is fitter for. A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be ultimately happy. What a man can be, he must be… This tendency might be phrased as the desire to become everything that one is capable of being.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-actualisation vs. Aristotle

A

Self-actualization is the idea that a psychologically healthy person will try to fulfill their potential. This implies that there must be a potential to fulfil. This potential must be intrinsic and so, individuals must be born with a purpose. Some forms of teleology state that natural beings are born with intrinsic purposes. As self-actualization seems to imply moving toward the person’s intrinsic purpose, we can say that the concept is teleological.

This is similar to Aristotle’s final cause

But Maslow was not directly influenced by Aristotle. He came to this via another path.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Maslow autobiography

What drew him to psychology?

What was the “new Athens” and how did it come about?

A
  • Father of humanistic psychology
  • The psychological perspective that rose in opposition to behaviourism and psychoanalysis
  • Emphasizes the individuals inherent drive toward self-actualization; the process of realizing and expressing one’s own capabilities and creativity
  • More against psychoanalysis but hits behaviourism too
  • 1920s: Maslow was at first drawn to psychology by Watson and his behaviourism! Even though he would become its most ardent opposition
  • This was because behaviourism was seen as more scientific
  • Which could lead to social improvements
  • We forget that at this time, racism etc. was rampant and behaviourism had no negative attitude to race or sex or whatever – there is no natural order to things, it is all learned
  • For Maslow, as a Jew, this was really appealing
  • In the 19330s PhD at Wisconsin with Harlow on the dominance behaviour of rhesus monkeys
  • Harry Harlow – did the studies on baby monkeys if you remove them from their mother – the wire monkey experiments. Won’t do as well without their mom
  • This dominance topic was previously studied by Adler, a follower of Freud. He said that the Oedipus complex is not the main issue for humans but an inferiority complex and so we strive for dominance
  • Maslow studies this in rhesus monkeys in a ground-breaking comparative psychology way
  • His thesis was ahead of its time
  • Because he was Jewish, he could not find a position
  • He compromises and does a postdoc at Thorndike at Columbia – used to be a lot easier to get a position!
  • By that time Thorndike is not studying animals but has grants to work on educational topics
  • In 1937 takes a poorly paid position at Brooklyn college
  • BUT in the 1940sw a lot of intellectuals flee Germany and most went to New York and this city will become and intellectual hub, the “new Athens”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who were Maslow’s original mentors in Psychology

A

He found neo-Freudian mentors like Adler, Horney and Fromm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who was Eric Fromm and what did he do that is notable?

Who did he influence?

A

. Eric Fromm is a psychoanalyst and in 1941 he wrote Escape from Freedom: What makes us fundamentally human is our free will. This is central to our humanity, but it is hard to have freedom. Every time you choose something, you are rejecting something else. These are hard choices. So, humans are also driven away from accepting that they have free will. We want to escape from having to make those choices.

We can escape by choosing to follow a leader or religious rules very strictly. So, there are many ways but these will eventually be pathological. For Fromm, the only healthy way is to accept the responsibility of your choices yourself and this is difficult. This influenced Maslow big time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which gestalt psychologists influenced Maslow, what is the basic tenant of gestalt and what did they work on?

A

Maslow was influenced by Wertheimer and Goldstein who are Gestalt psychologists.; you cannot break down conscious perceptions into simple elements. But they worked on all topics, not just perception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who was Wertheimer and what influence did he have on Maslow?

Insight

A

Wertheimer: Taught at Brooklyn College with Maslow. For him, learning is not about trial and error. It is more complex than decomposing behaviour into smaller things that can be reinforced. In the context of learning, Gestalt psychologists emphasise insight (the aha moment). And this is important for Maslow as it critiques simplistic behaviourism.

Wertheimer was also critical of psychologies obsession with pathological. He wanted more focus on positive aspects of psychology.

Maslow mixed all of this into his hierarchy with self-actualization on top

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Carl Rogers and what is Humanistic Psychology really relevant for?

A

Humanistic psychology is much more relevant clinically than academically, but Maslow was not a therapist. Rogers was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Rogers and psychoanalysis

A

Directed the counselling centre at U of Chicago. He slowly abandoned the psychoanalysis that he was trained in and created client-centred therapy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain the basic ideas of client centred therapy

A

The client is not someone with a pathology, they are not a patient. It is normal for humans to go through hard times. Rogers sees himself as a therapist like a guide to get through these moments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why Client and not patient

A

Client has a more egalitarian meaning than patient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is non-directive therapy?

What theory is it in line with?

A

He does non-directive therapy. This is a lot more in line with self-actualisation. The goal is to help people make their own decisions and find their own way. By definition, the therapy cannot be directive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In what way did Rogers use relection and what is it?

A

He uses reflection a lot. Taking what the client tells you, re-wording it and sending it back to the client. If done will, it is really good. Shows client that you understand (empathetic listening), and it can also be used to encourage the exploration of the issue under discussion and you can give your reflection angle which subtly directs the client (like emphasising the cognitions).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is Free Will in a legal contect?

A

Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. This is what is used in courts of law, if you could have taken the other choice and nothing prevented it, then you had free will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Skinner think about Free Will? Particularly in a legal context

A

Skinner felt that only actions that are free willed are seen as deserving credit or blame. This issue is that it is not clear what unimpeded means. There could be hidden motivation which pushes you one way or another. If that is so, there is no difference between freedom or coerced action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the philisophical definition of free will and what is the problem with it?

A

Philosophers use the definition that free will is the capacity to make choices in which the outcome has not been determined by past events. This means there is nothing else other than you that makes this choice. Under this definition, it is very hard to have free will. Only via dualism can you have free will this way: where you fight your passion, you use your reason, and you have free will. Otherwise, impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is determinism relative to free will?

A

The opposite position is determinism, which suggests that only one course of events is possible, which is incompatible with the existence of free will thus conceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Is free will compatible with determinism?

A

We do not know.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is incompatibilism and what are its two forms?

A

Incompatibilism
No, the two cannot be together.
(1) metaphysical libertarianism – determinism is false, free will is true. Cartesian dualism
(2) Hard determinism – everything is determined and free will is impossible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Up until this point, is psychology deterministic?

Give some examples (6)

(The sixth is ambiguous)

A

Psychology so far is totally deterministic (maybe cos it wants to be a science so badly)

  1. Physiology is deterministic (S>R)
  2. Hereditary intelligence is deterministic
  3. Depth psychology is deterministic. The psyche is influenced always by passions, external reality and moral demands
  4. Behaviourism is deterministic (external reinforcement)
  5. Instincts and needs are deterministic (MacDougall)
  6. Self-actualisation is… being determined by a certain potential (like you are being pushed by something towards something)? OR the result if exerting one’s free will? You can out this in the debate in many ways! Prof likes the second one.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Is self- actualisation deterministic?

A

Self-actualisation is… being determined by a certain potential (like you are being pushed by something towards something)? OR the result if exerting one’s free will? You can out this in the debate in many ways! Prof likes the second one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What idea could provide a way out of deterministic psychology?

A

Self-actualisation provides a way out of this deterministic psychology.

32
Q

What is compatibalism?

What is the fundemental issue with it

A

The idea that determinism is compatible with free will.

Ist is always going to be a compromise and that makes it by definition imperfect.

33
Q

What are the two types of compatibalism?

A

(1) Classical compatibalism

(2) Contemporary compatibalism

34
Q

What is classical compatibalism and what is the issue with it?

A

(1) Classical compatibilism. E.g. what would happen in a court of law: we have free will as long as we are not constrained or coerced. This issue with this is that it avoids the central question of determinism; what if we cannot really see or determine the force that compels us)

35
Q

What is comtemporary compatibalism and what is a good example of it?

A

(2) Contemporary compatibilism – free will is defined as a psychological capacity. Free will is not defined as like before, it is a state of mind. This is a psychological capacity to direct one’s behaviour in a way responsive to reason.

Frankfurt (1971) The hierarchical mesh

36
Q

What is the Franbkfurt School’s idea about compatibalism?

A

Frankfurt (1971) The hierarchical mesh

When we take decisions, these are taken at more than one level. E.g., drug addiction

37
Q

What are the two levels of the Frankfurt School’s heirarchal mesh?

A

(1) First order desire – that urge or need to take the drug gets consciously presented to the mind
(2) Second order desire – is the free desire. You can choose to accept or not the first order desire.

38
Q

Using drug addiction as an example, illustrate the Frankfurt Heirachical Mesh using the metaphor of a drug addict.

(There are 3 possible combinations of first and second order desires)

A

3 Possibilities using the metaphor of an addict
(1) First order: I want the drug – no second order desire – this is the “wanton addict”
You do not think twice, very impulsive
(2) First order: I want the drug – 2nd order – I want the drug – willing addict
(3) First order: I want the drug – 2nd order – I do not want the drug – unwilling addict
Unclear what will win, will the urge win or will you refrain?

39
Q

What does the second order desire resemble?

A

The second order desire resembles executive functions (capacity to inhibit behaviour).

40
Q

What is the problem with the Heirachial mesh model?

A

Like all compatibilist positions, there is a messy compromise. Here there is infinite regress. Why do you want or not want the drug? This 2nd order might be determined by something else. Likely always more and more determinants.

41
Q

Is the wanton addict human from the Frankfurt School’s perspective?

A

From Frankfurt’s perspective, the wanton addict is not human as he does not have free will

42
Q

How is personality different from motivation

A

Personality is the part that cannot be explained by the general laws of motivation – how different people react in the same circumstances is under the domain of personality.

43
Q

First personality researcher

A

Gordon Allport

44
Q

Gordon Allport rough biography

A

The founder of this. He did a Ph.D. at Harvard in 1922 when personality was becoming a hot topic. His older brother also did a doctorate at Harvard. His brother was editor of abnormal psychology journals and exposed him to the new science of personality. In the 20s, you see a rise of papers but it is not a field yet so he decided to do his doctorate on this.

45
Q

Where does the word personality come from and what is the background?

In the 1800s-1900s what connatation did it have?

A

Personality comes from the Greek work persona – the mask actors wear in their plays. In Jung, the persona is the mask we show others, if you think you are the persona, that is a psych issue. But in the 1800s/1900s it has a medical connotation such as a personality disorder (Freud proposed a bunch).

46
Q

What was Allport interested in?

Why did Allport call it personality instead of charecter?

A

Allport is interested in the medical aspects but his real interest is to study interindividual differences in how people react to the same circumstance.

Not really in a pathological way.

Was called character before but there were too many moralistic connotations. And so eventually labelled this personality research.

47
Q

How did intelligence tests influence the development of personality psychology?

A

At the start of the 19220 intelligence tests are well established. People decide they need to measure other aspects of individuality. Take the same methods as intelligence testing and apply to other traits.

48
Q

How did shell shock contribute to personality?

What was the name of the measure (and the researcher that created it)?

Was it a good measure?

A

There were already measures like the Woodworth Personal Data Sheet published in 1919 and developed during the war. Designed to measure who will get “shell shock”. He interviewed shell shocked soldiers and their clinicians and made 116 questions. Lots of silly items on these tests, it has never been validated. It was based on face validity. You discuss with patients, see if there is a sign you notice, put it in the test. The clear objective was to see who was at risk for shell shock.

49
Q

Psychoanalysis and the measurement of personality

A

Freud and psychoanalysis also already had the notions of personality. Freud had oral, anal etc. Jung had extraversion and introversion. So he had ground to build this theory on but he was really working against them.

50
Q

What areas of psychology influenced Allport’s measurement of personality?

A

Woodworth and research done in WW1 on Shell Shock

Psychoanalysis and measurements of personality

51
Q

What ties all the ideas of existing personality theories together?

What 5 things contribute to personality (5 traits) in Allport’s model?

A

what tied them all together was the idea of traits: A habitual pattern of behaviour, intelligence, temperament, sociality and emotion which seem to differentiate people.

52
Q

What was there already a solid measure for?

A

Intelligence was already covered by tests.

53
Q

SO what did allport start building a measure for?

A

So, he started by building tests for the other 4 dimensions. He built a prototype for a personality questionnaire. Tests on 55 people.

54
Q

Allport plus Stern

A

Later, he moved to Germany to do a postdoc with William Stern. He was a gestalt therapist who was interested in personality

55
Q

What was Stern’s idea of the two parts of personality psychology called?

A

Realtional individuality

Real individuality

56
Q

What is relational individuality?

A

Relational individuality: defined by the subject person’s relative or statistical positions on a large variety of separately measured traits. Your relational individuality is the specific pattern you get on all these scales. When the number of traits is large, no two people are likely to have the same pattern of scores. For stern this is a cheap and easy way to assess individuality, but you lose a lot. This is what we do today.

57
Q

What is real individuality?

A

Real individuality: A Gestalt like conception of each person’s unique and unified self that is more than the sum of its individual characteristics. Real individuality must be approaches not by statistical comparisons with others but by examining the relationships of qualities within each person, primarily through the close analysis of individual life histories or case studies. The whole is more than the sum of its parts.

58
Q

Quanlitative vs. Quantitative (very basic overview)

Europe vs. Anglosphere

A

Quantitative is about the average (seen as scientific). Qualitative do not use depth. Europeans prefer qualitative because they recognise that the experimenter contributes something to the data. In the Anglo tradition, the idea of directly and impartially measuring something reigns supreme.

This is a gross oversimplification which reduces anglos into a monolithic culture that is (as usual) only really representitive of the USA. In the UK there is loads of qualitative research. I did a whole PhD on it. This is a ridiculus statement that I will ahve to swallow and learn as he is the professor.

59
Q

What does Allport think of real individuality?

A

Allport agrees with Stern about the importance of real individualism.

60
Q

What book did Allport publish?

A

Allport would later publish “Personality, a Psychological Interpretation” in 1930 which was the first modern book on personality.

61
Q

What are Nomothetic methods?

A

Nomothetic methods study people in terms of general dimensions or characteristics that vary to quantitatively specifiable degrees.

62
Q

Wat are idiographic methods?

A

Idiographic methods investigate and describe what it is that makes a given person unique, an approach that is more likely to be qualitative than quantitative. Investigates and escribes what makes an individual unique.

63
Q

Which methods did Gordon Allport most follow?

A

Personally, he follows the nomothetic approach.

64
Q

Who is Ranymod Cattell and why did he come to the USA?

What was he an expert in?

What was the purppose of his research in personality?

A

In 1941 Allport was in good standing at Harvard and hired Raymond Cattell, a statistician, trained at the University of London in factor analysis. Is in the lineage of British statistics. Allport got Harvard to hire him.

He is a specialist in Factor Analysis – a technique that allows you to derive a small number of dimensions that explain a maximal amount of variability across different scales or items of a questionnaire (like in intelligence). He applied this strategy to personality tests.

To find the best measures of personality (lower the number of basic factors)

65
Q

Why did Cattell go to Chicago?

Was his workk an improvement?

A

He moved to Illinois to get access to a computer – very hard without a computer. With a computer, Allport and him, can reduce 35 traits into 16 more basic dimensions/factors. This is not a spectacular reduction in dimensions!

66
Q

What was Hans Eysenk’s idea about personality traits?

A

16 is too much. For him the three are psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism.

67
Q

What were personality psycholgists doing at this time?

What does this show about factor analysis?

A

Arguing about how many factors there are in personalities

(Also points out that factor analysis is not magic and does not always work). It looks like it can bring an empirical solution but then people will argue about how many and what they are.

68
Q

Walter Mischel and personality

Name 3 strong situation experiments that are stupidly famous

A

He questioned whether behaviour in a situation is more strongly determined by personality traits or dispositions or by the demands of the particular circumstances.

There were experiments that demonstrate strong social situations. In these, most people will act in the same way. Even if that way is extreme or spectacular. E.g., Milgram, Stanford prison and Asch’s conformity study.

69
Q

What happened in the 1980s in terms of personality?

A

But then in the 1980s there is a consensus on the number of traits (5) OCEAN.

70
Q

Dazsiger and his personality criticism

(1) what is the main assumption of personality research

A
  • Personality tests all relay on the use of language to study personality
  • This comes with assumptions that are never challenged or discussed
  • The idea is that Personality is something that exists in the natural world which exists independently from our description of it (like height or weight|)
71
Q

Danziger and his personality criticism

(2) why is that a problem?

What assumption must we make to get around this?

Which emplies what belief?

A
  • But the way to investigate this thing that is separate from language is dependent entirely on language
  • If you stick to the data, the only thing you can say that this analysis will reveal is a semantic space of personality description
  • All we get is less and less dimensions needed to describe something
  • But we do not know if what we are describing is just our way of describing personality or if we are describing something that exists in the real world
  • To make that conclusion that it is something in the natural world we have to assume that language reflects the natural contours of an objective world existing outside and independently of it
  • Belief in a timeless “human nature”, independent of culture and history. In that perspective, historical variations of language used to describe personality have to represent an even better reflection of it (i.e., the description gets better with time).
  • Psychologists do not usually have an issue with this
  • But if we say language reflects reality, then we say that words are just ways we describe something that exists e.g., neuroticism has always existed, but we didn’t have the right word for it
72
Q

Danziger and his personality criticism

(3) an example

A

• E.g., one day there was the word intelligence. Was this a name given to something that existed before and always had done separate from the word or did we invent the concept alongside the word that does not have a 1:1 relationship with the world?

73
Q

What does Prof. Roy think about personality and Danziger’s crticism?

Why does he think that?

What evidence from other measures influenced this?

A

Prof says we should be cautious with personality testing conclusions, but that Danziger goes too far. Some tests do not use adjectives that describe stuff (like the MMPI-2 which asks people questions about them ands their behaviour to extract personality data). This is more than just describing what we think personality is, it is getting people to imagine themselves in a situation and asking them how they would react. There are issues like social desirability, but this is well recognised by personality psychologists.

74
Q

Allport’s book and idiographic methods

A

The second part of Allport’s book (Idiographic methods)

He did not use these personally, but he was in favour of them. He helped a colleague Henry A. Murray develop such techniques. Generally, academics like the nomothetic/quantitative methods and clinicians will probably prefer the idiographic measures.

75
Q

Who was Henry Murray?

What did he found at Harvard?

How did Gordan Allport help?

A

Murray was one of the first clinical psychologists. There has always been a struggle between clinical and academic psychology. Murry founded the Harvard Psychological Clinic in 1927 without consulting the psychology department. They created a clinic within the university, but it had no links with the department. The department tried to shut it down I the 1930s.

Allport defended them vigorously and Murray made a plaque for him for defending the clinic and clinical psychology.

76
Q

What test did Murray develop and what is it’s purpose?

A

Murray developed the Thematic Apperception Tests (TAT). This is a projective test. There is no wrong or right answer. Patients are asked to look at a picture and come up with a story. This gives you much more qualitative research.

77
Q

What is psychobibliography?

A

Another domain of idiographic research is research on special individual’s personality. The first popular book was a psychobiography on Adolph Hitler. Published in the 1970s based on a report in 1942 by Lenger.

He predicted that Hitler would kill himself if he lost the war.

There were many studies using psychological theories to interpret people’s lives (and there still are).

All a bit silly!