Lecture 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is history?

A

History is the interpretive study of the events of the Human past.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is historiography?

A

Historiography is the writing of history including techniques and strategies for investigating specific content areas. This also includes philosophical questions about history and historical method. Historiography is how we study history.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the study of history start?

What are hermaneutics?

A

History starts with observations, so can be considered an empirical discipline but these must be interpreted. Cannot really separate data from the search as the search itself introduces biases.
Freudian psychoanalysis sort of follows a similar method. Data provided from client and analysed by analyst.

Hermeneutics is how we interpret data. History cannot be considered science cos does not follow the scientific method. BUT still valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is historicism?

A

Historicism is the interpretation of these facts with reference to political, social, artistic or intellectual values as they were respected then and there. Preferred by historians.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is presentism?

A

Presentism is the interpretation of these facts with reference to political, social, artistic or intellectual values as they were respected here and now. Generally, historians try not to do this though this can be very hard with certain subjects like racism which seem abhorrent to us in the modern era but were quite tolerated for large parts of the past. Can be challenging.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a special person orientation?

A

A special person orientation is the idea that certain people influence history and that without those people, history might have been different, and things might not have happened the way they did. It might be that without Freud, we would have no unconscious or talking therapies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a zeitgeist?

A

The Zeitgeist is the sprit (mentality) of the times. This is the climate of opinions and attitudes assumed in an epoch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an ortgeist?

A

The Ortgeist is the spirit (mentality) of a place. This is the climate of opinions and attitudes assumed in a community or country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Zeitgeist/Ortgeist orientation?

A

The Zeitgeist/Ortgeist orientation is to say that without the special people, history would have continued as it did anyway. That is that events have their own momentum and individuals are secondary puppets in the hands of history. Events by themselves have a momentum that permits somebody at the right time (Zeitgeist) and place (Ortgeist) to enact or express them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the linear/rpgressive hypothesis?

A

The linear-progressive hypothesis posits that each generation builds upon discoveries from previous generations. This means society is going generally towards an ideal, even if the path occasionally goes backwards. Overall, there is progression. Comte and positivism are a good example; science leads to certain truths and will eventually solve all problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the cyclical hypothesis?

A

The Cyclical hypothesis posits that history repeats itself in cycles. Political, economic, social, artistic and scientific events and concepts disappear and reappear again in new forms. An example of this was introspection which aimed to explore consciousness. This disappeared in the 1930s due to the rise of behaviourism but has reappeared recently because Francis Crick in the 1990s said that our understanding of the brain is now sufficient to relook for consciousness. This could be seen as introspection disguised as neuroscience because this is palatable for the new time period. Other ideas and philosophies disappear in one era and then are revisited later.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the chaos hypothesis?

A

The Chaos hypothesis posits that there is no order whatsoever. Political, social, artistic, and scientific events happen by chance. These cannot be predicted. Nothing and no one make history; history makes itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Ebbinghaus say about psychology?

A

Ebbinghaus – psychology has a long past but a short history.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Greek Miracle?

A

The Greek miracle was the period when the people of Greece stopped attributing the causes of natural phenomena to gods and mythical things and started to turn to natural problems. Greece had settlements all over, so this miracle spread fast.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was thought about the universe in the time before the pre-socratics?

A

Prior to the pre-Socratics, people thought the world was made of 4 elements: earth (food), air (breathing), fire (warmth) and water (drinking). All four of these are essential for human life so it makes sense why they would find these fundamental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In the time of the pre socratics, what were philosphers interested in?

What were the 4 schools of thought?

A

Prior to the pre-Socratics, people thought the world was made of 4 elements: earth (food), air (breathing), fire (warmth) and water (drinking). All four of these are essential for human life so it makes sense why they would find these fundamental.

During this time, people were interested in what makes up the universe. There was no scientific method so they theorised using philosophy. There were 4 schools of thought.
How many basic elements make up the universe?

Qualitative monist – one basic element

Qualitative pluralist – many basic elements

Is there just one thing in number or many?

Quantitative monist – one thing

Quantitative pluralist – many things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is qualitative monism?

A

Qualitative monism: There is only one basic element making up the universe. For instance, the Milesians were qualitative monists. The basic element is water or air. Democritus is also a qualitative monist: the basic element is the atom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did the Milesians think?

A
  • Come from Mylese

* Believe there is one element behind everything and that this explains the observed order of the universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Milesians - Thales

A

• The first philosopher was Thales. He contributed greatly to the Greek miracle. He was a head in the cloud philosopher who people looked down on. He got tired of this and used his accurate astronomical and meteorological measurements to predict it would be a good season for olives and bough all the olive presses. It was and he made a lot of money. He did this to prove a point; he could make money from knowledge, but he considered it more important to understand the universe than to get rich.
He felt the most important thing in the universe is water. For him, everything was made of water. Water is what we can see in all 3 phases and is essential for life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Milesians - Anaximander

A

• Anaximander believed that everything is organized into pairs of opposites. E.g., wetness/dryness. Following from this, if everything is opposed then we cannot define what the basic element is. He called this Aperion; a basic element for the universe that cannot be defined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Milesians - Anaximenes

A

• Anaximenes said that the basic element is air.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is Quantitative pluralism?

A

Qualitative pluralism posits that there may be more than one thing which fundamentally makes up the universe. The best example of pure qualitative pluralism would be the then prevailing view that there are 4 basic elements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Give an overview of double aspect monism

What is the saucer example?

A

• Heraclitus and Pythagoras – double aspect monism (qualitative pluralists (double aspect) & quatitative monists)
Heraclitus and Pythagoras were qualitative pluralists (there are two aspects of one thing) but quantitative monist (there is only one thing).

E.g., a saucer. It is one thing but appears convex or concave depending on where you view it from. It is only one thing, but it has two aspects.

• These philosophers had similar theories (but never met). They believed that there one thing but that it has a double aspect to. Is a saucer complex or concave? It is both!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Double aspect monist - Heraticlus

A

• Heraclitus from Ephesus says everything Is changing; “you cannot step in the same river twice”/ But he believed there was order in the change. For him, fire represented one aspect (change) and logos (order) the other. Logos is an intrinsic order in the Universe. It is not God (just an organising force).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Double aspect monist - Pythagoras

A

• Pythagoras says everything is changing but does not assign an element. For him. the organising principle was mathematics because any kind of chape can be expressed in mathematical form (and so this is the order of the universe).
He founded a school in Croton the Academy (southern Italy) and was visited by Socrates and Plato. Mystical aspect, a bit like a cult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is quantitative monism?

A

Quantitative monism is the idea that there is numerically only one thing in the universe. It works well if it is paired with qualitative pluralism (for instance in double-aspect monism) but is harder to imagine if paired with qualitative monism. as are stuck with having to explain why there seems to be many things… the Eleatics says it’s all an illusion.

27
Q

What were the Elatics and what did they think?

A

• The Elatics (qualitative AND quantitative monists) – there is only one kind of thing, and everything is made up of numerically one thing. Ultra-rationalists.

28
Q

Elatics - Parmenides

A

• Parmenides believed that all change is an illusion. Sensory experience is not real, the real can only be understood by reason.

29
Q

Elatics - Zeno

A

• Zeno of Elea thought that movement was logically an illusion. Used a paradox to explain how this is so. Cannot catch a turtle. Thought all sensory information was an illusion. This is an intellectual dead end.

30
Q

What is the problem with the Elatics

A

• These guys thought that there was one kind of thing and numerically one thing in the universe. They are stuck with having to explain why there seems to be many things and get around this by saying it’s all an illusion.

31
Q

What is quantitative pluralism

A

Quantitative pluralism is the idea that there are many things in the universe. Democrates was a qualitative monist as he believed all the universe was made up of atoms but a quantitative pluralist as he believed there were many of atoms (an infinite amount).

32
Q

Empedocles

A
  • Empedocles (Quantitative and Qualitative Pluralist)
  • Everything comes from 4 elements (earth, fire, wind, water)
  • These are organised by two forces – love/strife or attraction/repulsion
  • These forces create a cosmic cycle of integration and disintegration which accounts for the order in the universe
33
Q

Anaxagoras

A
  • Anaxagoras (qualitative and qualitative pluralist)
  • Believes there is a basic element for every type of thing (an infinite number of types)
  • Calles these seeds
  • There are seeds for everything: bone, flesh, hair etc
  • These are organised by a cosmic nous which is a cosmic mind drawing things into an ordered direction (this is the beginnings of theology and is a theological explanation). This is a bit more like God but not a pantheon of Gods.
34
Q

Democritus

A
  • Democritus (qualitative monist but a quantitative pluralist)
  • Believed that there is only one type of thing (atoms)
  • Atom = something that cannot be cut
  • But there is an infinite number of all of them
  • Apparent order comes from blind forces combining things by chance (this is a mechanistic explanation)
  • You can see this is very deterministic and materialist – everything can be explained in terms of mechanisms/. This can be seen as the precursor to reductionism.
35
Q

What was different in terms of interests between socrates/sophists/plato and the pre-socratics?

A

Unlike the pre-Socratics, mostly interested in understanding humans. The idea of the split between natural sciences (study the universe) and humanities (study humans) comes from Socrates.

36
Q

Socrates and the oracle

A

Socrates never wrote anything; he followed an oral tradition. Plato wrote what he said in dialogues and so you never know if Socrates said it, or Plato did and ascribed it to Socrates to avoid censure for it.

He wanted to know who the wisest man in Greece was so went to the Oracle who told him Socrates. Could not believe it. Started questioning people he thought were wiser than himself. Found out that they did not know anything AND that they did not know that they did not know anything. He was the wisest because he knew that he did not know.

He used Socratic questioning to expose that people did not know what they thought they did.

37
Q

Socrates and essentialism

A

He was an essentialist. He was asking incessant questions because he was trying to get at the essence of things (a real, objective truth). He felt that his questions could give birth to truth (using the analogy of childbirth). Through questions, he helps ideas be born.

38
Q

Who were the Sophists?

A

The Sophists were masters in the art of discourse. In this time, public debates were a big deal and they would sell their services to speak better and hence, advance themselves. They were exponents of relativism: there are different truths for different people i.e. there is no objective truth. Hot or cold could be perceived differently by different people. This eventually influenced pragmatism; nothing is true or false, but some truths are more useful than others. Protagoras was a sophist; man is the measure of all things.

39
Q

Explain socrates vs the sophists

What happened to Socrates in the end?

A

Because Socrates was an essentialist and they were relativists, they disagreed. Socrates used questioning to undermine their supposed knowledge and made them look a bit silly. He also taught his followers to question everything, including power. Eventually he was sentenced to death for teaching youth to question everything (including the government).

His followers arranged for him to leave Athens, but he felt strongly that the law was to be followed and used this as a teaching moment for them. He drank hemlock and died.

40
Q

Who was Plato and what did he think?

A

Plato was a student of Socrates. Leaving Athens after his death he went to the Pythagoreans. His early work is in the voice of Socrates and his later stuff reflects Pythagorean mysticism.

From the Pythagoreans he leans the idea that geometrical knowledge is the most prestigious type of knowledge because it can be completely derived from principles of reasoning (and so is very rationalist). After all, a true equilateral triangle does not exist anywhere except in the mind.

He does not believe that our senses tell us about the true nature of reality. Our senses only show u imperfect reflections of forms.

41
Q

Plato’s allegory of the cave

According to Plkato, what is the pourpose of philosophers?

A

Plato’s theory of forms/allegory of the cave
Made the distinction between the realm of never changing, ideal Forms and the realm of ever-changing material reality in which the Forms of ideas are imperfectly realised.

To illustrate this, he used the allegory of the cave.

  1. There are men chained in a cave
  2. They have been there all their lives and so all they ever experienced was within the cave
  3. They see on the wall, the shadows of the real Forms of objects behind them
  4. Because this is all they have ever seen, they believe these imperfect renditions to be reality

For Plato, the role of the philosopher is to break these chains and exit the cave in order to directly realise true Forms.

42
Q

Plato and Anamnesis

A

Plato and the Soul
Plato believed in Soul/Body dualism. He thought that the soul is immortal and made up of leftovers of the cosmos soul. He believed that before we were born, we were connected to this cosmos-soul and know everything, having access to all Forms. So, for him, using reason, we can get access to this cosmic-soul’s knowledge. Hence for him, knowing is remembering; when we use our rational mind to derive knowledge, we are remembering stuff we forgot at birth, and we can get access to some of this forgotten knowledge this way. He called this Anamnesis. The knowledge recovered will be knowledge of Forms.

43
Q

Plato and the tripartate model of the soul

WHat is it similar to that will come a lot later?

A

He also had a tripartite model of this soul. He presented this in a political book called The Republic where he theorised that civilisation (the City) should be set up this way. Reason (the brain) was the ruling class – there role was to lead. Spirit (heart) was the soldiers/military class – there role was to protect. The appetite (liver) was the working class – there role was to nourish. According to Plato, justice happens when all these groups attended to their roles, there would be harmony in the city.

Paternalistic and elitist.

Similar to Freudian superego, ego and id.

44
Q

Aristotle basic biography

A

Aristotle
• Son of the doctor of the Macedonian King Amyntas II
• Student of Plato
• Founded the Lyceum (broader than the Academy of Pythagoras)
• Wrote 150 books on many subjects, all lost
• Made a taxonomy of living things; illustrates his process (1) make observations (2) use reason to organise it

45
Q

How did Plato think we got knowledge? What about thes senses?

A

Plato – Truth found through thinking (introspection). The senses lie. The mind is the origin of knowledge.

46
Q

How did Aristotle think we got knowledge? What about thes senses?

A

Aristotle – Truth is found by observing nature: sense are reliable. The mind is the organiser of knowledge.

47
Q

What is the problem of participation?

A

For Plato, the Forms are transcendent. They do not exist in the real world but are separate from it. If Forms are separate from matter, how are the two related? Immanent forms are physical and exist. i.e. how do the particulars participate in the universals?

If you have (1) A particular white i.e. the white of a rabbit and (2) the Form of pure white, how do these interact?

For Plato (2) is not present in (1). Aristotle disagrees. For Plato the Form of white is reflected in the white of the rabbit like the shadows in his cave allegory. But this causes many problems; what is pure white? Is it the average of all known whites? Plato says no cos these are all imperfect. Also, what is the colour of this pure white? Is it white? If so, do we need another Form of white to explain this pure white?

According to Aristotle, this is confusing nonsense. We cannot talk about things that we have no direct experience of.

48
Q

Hylomorphism

How does this argue against materialism?

A

Aristotle says that the form is IN the particular. He illustrates this with the analogy of a ship.

  1. Take a ship
  2. Replace every part of it slowly
  3. All parts are now replaced
  4. Is it the same ship?

Intrinsically, we say yes. It has maintained its Form. So, there is more to reality than just the material (a good argument against materialism),

Forms also matter. This also shows that there must be both Form and matter in this ship as for it to be this ship requires both.

This is Hylomorphism: A particular is a composite of both From and Matter. Great argument against radical materialism.

49
Q

What are Aristotles 4 causes

A

There are 4 explanations (or causes for the way things are (i.e., the 4 BEcasues).

  1. Efficient cause – the physical force exerted. I.e., what causes the ball to move? An external force
  2. Material cause – the thing the stuff is made of
  3. The formal cause – the essential nature of the thing i.e. why is an earing an earing (it has the Form of an earring)
  4. The Final Cause - the telos or purpose which has the potential to be actualised. I.e. an acorn has the final cause of being an Oak tree. Whatever the circumstances, an acorn will always strive to be an Oak. This is a fundamental property of living things. Teleological cause. Nothing mistic here, no God needed. Really, he uses this to speak of the resilience of living things.
50
Q

What is the efficient casue?

A
  1. Efficient cause – the physical force exerted. I.e., what causes the ball to move? An external force
51
Q

What is the material cause?

A
  1. Material cause – the thing the stuff is made of
52
Q

What is the formal cause?

A
  1. The formal cause – the essential nature of the thing i.e. why is an earing an earing (it has the Form of an earring)
53
Q

What is the final casue?

A
  1. The Final Cause - the telos or purpose which has the potential to be actualised. I.e. an acorn has the final cause of being an Oak tree. Whatever the circumstances, an acorn will always strive to be an Oak. This is a fundamental property of living things. Teleological cause. Nothing mistic here, no God needed. Really, he uses this to speak of the resilience of living things.
54
Q

What is Psyche

A

Psyche – breath of life: living things have souls (animating principles). Which distinguish them from non-living things.

55
Q

What is Aristotle’s scale of nature?

What are the 5 layers?

Is this an influential theory?

A

Scale of nature
Is a hierarchal ordering of living things bounded by simple plants on the bottom and humans on the top.

Nutritive – base, all living things have this. Keeps an organism alive. Eating, reproduction, circulation etc.

Sensory – one level up, can perceive an environment

Appetitive – has desires

Locomotive – allows movement to reach one’s goals

Mind – top layer. Has reason, intellect and nous

Very influential idea. The scale of nature has been applied to many things including the evolutionary origins of brain regions.

56
Q

Why is deduction better than induction?

A

First, deduction is better than induction. With induction, you can never be certain. It only takes one case to refute the generalization. For instance, all rabbits have fur, or all swans are white. So, he rules off induction right from the start. Deduction allows you to reach more certain conclusions, as if you accept the premises then you must accept the conclusions. But then the problem is how you find the premises. To avoid an infinite regress, you need to find first self-evident premises that cannot be explained by anything else

57
Q

What was aristotles first 3 steps before trying to get the premises needed?

A

Refutes empiricism

If you observe 100000 rabbits and generalise those rabbits have fur, it only takes one example to disprove the idea. SO empirical generalization breaks down
.
Refute rationalism

(Or Plato’s innatism – we are born knowing). Rationalism would entail that we do not know what we know which is logically impossible.

Deductive reasoning is the way to go because deductive reasoning allows the conclusion to be certain IF we agree with the
premises.

Syllogism – Major premise: All X are Y
Minor premise – All Zs are Xs
Conclusion – All Zs are Ys
If you agree with the premises, you musty accept the conclusion.

But how do we get the premises?

58
Q

What are aristotles 4 steps to get the premises?

A

There are first, axiomatic principles (self-evident truths). How do we get them?
(1) Sensation
• Use the 5 senses + sensis communis (the integration of the 5 senses)
• Combining the 5 senses gives us a unified percept of the object
• We do not directly perceive the matter of the universe, rather indirectly through our senses. Many animals are only aware of their immediate sensory perception
(2) Memory
• Humans can remember the object even if it is not immediately present
• The tissues of sensory organs are like a wax tablet, they can receive “imprints” from external stimuli which is the basis of memory
• Old people have poor memory because of tablet decay, youth because of rapid growth which covers the imprints (and is why we have no early childhood memories)
(3) Organized experience
• Regrouping and classifying memories as a function of laws of association
• 1 – Contiguity: When we think of something, we think of what occurred with it
• 2 – Contrast: When we think of something, we think of its opposite as well
• 3 – Similarity: When we think of something, we think of things similar to it
• 4 – Law of frequency: The more often we experience things together, the stronger associated they become
• 4 is like the law of associations that comes much later
• These are very similar to 60s cognitive theories!
(4) Intuitive apprehension of the universal essence
• We abstract the Form from the particulars
• How? We do it naturally
• Human minds are set up to do this
• This is not generalizing, we intuitively see the universal in all of the particulars, for us, this is just an innate process
• This is how (for Aristotle) we get to universals from particulars

59
Q

Aristotle epistemology Sensation

A

(1) Sensation
• Use the 5 senses + sensis communis (the integration of the 5 senses)
• Combining the 5 senses gives us a unified percept of the object
• We do not directly perceive the matter of the universe, rather indirectly through our senses. Many animals are only aware of their immediate sensory perception

60
Q

Aristotle epistemology Memory

A

(2) Memory
• Humans can remember the object even if it is not immediately present
• The tissues of sensory organs are like a wax tablet, they can receive “imprints” from external stimuli which is the basis of memory
• Old people have poor memory because of tablet decay, youth because of rapid growth which covers the imprints (and is why we have no early childhood memories)

61
Q

Aristotle epistemology Organized experience

A

(3) Organized experience
• Regrouping and classifying memories as a function of laws of association
• 1 – Contiguity: When we think of something, we think of what occurred with it
• 2 – Contrast: When we think of something, we think of its opposite as well
• 3 – Similarity: When we think of something, we think of things similar to it
• 4 – Law of frequency: The more often we experience things together, the stronger associated they become
• 4 is like the law of associations that comes much later
• These are very similar to 60s cognitive theories!

62
Q

Aristotle epistemology Intuative apprehension

A

(4) Intuitive apprehension of the universal essence
• We abstract the Form from the particulars
• How? We do it naturally
• Human minds are set up to do this
• This is not generalizing, we intuitively see the universal in all of the particulars, for us, this is just an innate process
• This is how (for Aristotle) we get to universals from particulars

63
Q

In short, why can humans abstract universals according to Aristotle?

A

So, Aristotle’s epistemology is essentially that we have an innate ability to abstract universals from particulars.

64
Q

What are the four main epistemological positions in philosophy

A

The 4 main epistemological positions in philosophy
(1) Empiricism: Generalisation based on sensations
(2) Rationalism: Use reason to work stuff out. Can include Innate knowledge – use reason to uncover it (Plato)
(3) Rational (or moderate) Empiricism – we need observations but also have an innate capacity to understand those observations (Aristotle)
First three associated with fundamentalism. Some knowledge can be certain.
(4) Skepticism – No Truth, everything is relative – Sophists (and goddamned post-modernists)