LECTURE 6: PREJUDICE & DISCRIMINATION Flashcards
What is discrimination?
when an employee, or group, is treated poorly or differentiated adversely based on prohibited grounds
Describe the landscape of discrimination in the Canadian workplace.
Canada considered an equal, multicultual society
* Many believe discrimination is a thing of the past
* Workplace discrimination in Canada is illegal
What does it mean for a group/individual to be marginalized?
excluded or pushed out of certain spaces
What is the corporate pipeline in Canada?
- Entry Level = even
- As you move up the corporate ladder, bar grows for white men
- Alternate explanation: women at disadvantage because they leave when they have children; don’t have the qualifications/education; general career goals (some don’t want to undertake leadership positions)
Why do group differences exist? How do we explain inequalities?
Look at internal & external attributions:
Internal differences in:
- effort
- ability
- credentials
- performance
- preferences & choice
External differences in:
- bias/discrimination
- barriers & disadvantage
- favouritism & nepotism
- privilege
- socialization
Internal = differences in merit
External = discrimination
How can we determine if group differences are a result of discrimination?
One method - ask marginalized group members & compare their experiences to other groups
e.g.
* Women 4% more likely to experience discrimination than men
* visible minorities 2-2.5 x more likely to experience discrimination
* Disabled 5x more likely to experience discrimination than those w/o
Explain how Canadian work experiences are unequal.
Large wage gap in terms of race for black & south-east-asian groups (compared to white group)
- Koreans, Chinese, South Asians, West Asians, Japanese, Arabs and Filipinos, had levels of education well above the national average
- still have wage gap
Do marginalized groups falsely perceive discrimination? How can obtain objective evidence?
- Maybe people belonging to marginalized groups are living in fear
- Discrimination is not always 100% clear
- best way to determine is to obtain objective evidence through experiments
Objective Evidence of Discrimination: Audit Studies
STUDY:
- Studied in Canadian context
- sent out resumes to real job posting using anglo sounding names & asian sounding names
Findings:
Asians called 32.6% less than white applicants
Objective Evidence of Discrimination: Meta-analysis
STUDY:
looked at the likelihood of calls vs non-marginalized groups
FINDINGS:
- marginalized groups received less call-backs in hiring
- effect of gender depends on the type of job
E.g. Male dominated jobs – discrimination against women; female dominated jobs discrimination against men
Objective Evidence of Discrimination: Discrimination against women
STUDY:
- meta analysis of experiments in realms of hiring, promotion, compensation, etc.
FINDINGS:
* Pro-female bias found for hiring for female dominated jobs – e.g. nursing/education jobs operate against men
- gender discrimination found for male-dominated jobs & male raters
Do discrimination effects occur in the workplace?
- Difficult to control experiments, know your coworkers group identities (for most part), can’t randomly assign people to condition
- discrimination evident in performance evaluations
- male professor received higher teaching evaluations
What are barriers to detecting discrimination?
- Discrimination can be subtle, & ambiguous
- Fundamental attribution error
- innate desire to see the world as just w/ fair systems
What is fundamental attribution error?
judgements can be based on internal or external factors; tend to attribute to internal factors
Internal - characteristics of the person
External - characteristics of the situation or context
- Marginalized groups also participate in FAE
What is the system justification theory?
- People, especially marginalized groups are motivated to legitimize the status quo, even when it is unfair
- Can stem from a need for order and stability
- Can stem from passive ease of supporting existing systems vs. hard work, costs of fighting status quo
- When disadvantaged by such a system = cognitive dissonance
- know something is unfair & we dont do anything about it
- marginalized groups experience the most dissonance
- engage in system justification (e.g. i did bad on the exam because i didnt work hard enough; dont account for teacher)
- Can results in reduced moral outrage about inequalities, injustices
- Can result in cultural stereotypes that justify status quo