lecture 6 Flashcards

1
Q

self-serving bias

A
  • attribute success to our good fortune, failure to circumstance
  • we see ourselves more favorably than we see others
  • “unrealistic” optimism
  • false consensus and uniqueness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

self-verification theory

A

-people have a need to confirm their self-concept- positive or negative (might conflict with the need to maintain a positive self-view)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

study: choose who to have an interaction with- those with negative self-concept:

A

were more likely to choose the unfavorable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

study: choose who to have an interaction with- those with positive self-concept:

A

chose favorable person

no conflict between two motives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is automatic thinking?

A

thinking that is nonconscious, unintentional, involuntary, and effortless
(can be very beneficial, sometimes leads to problems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when perceiving and processing social information, prejudgments can:

A

bias our perceptions, interpretations, and later recall (can be conscious or unconscious such as schemas)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

car crash example of prejudgements showed that:

A

about how fast were the cars going when they_____ each other?

  • smashed (fastest estimate)
  • hit
  • contacted (slowest estimate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a schema?

A

a schema is a mental structure people use to organize their knowledge of the social world around themes or subjects (influences information noticed, thought about, and remembered)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why are schemas important?

A

help us make sense of the world (we have schemas about many things)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what if no schemas?

A

Korsakov’s syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is accessibility? how do they affect which schemas are applied?

A

accessibility= extent to which schemas and concepts are at the forefront of the mind and thus likely to be used in making judgments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

types of accessibility?

A
chronic accessibility 
temporary accessibility (priming)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when are schemas problematic?

A
  • stereotypes

- when schemas can be activated for reasons that are arbitrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are stereotypes?

A

schemas applied to social groups, such as fraternity, gender, or race
(most often studied stereotypes are for African-Americans and women)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the “Donald” studies?

A
  • participants were told doing 2 unrelated experiments
    1) perception test: identifying colors while memorizing list of words
    2) reading comprehension study: read paragraph and give impression of donald
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what were the results of the “donald” studies?

A

the 1/2 of participants with positive words in 1st experiment rated donald as more positive “adventurous, self confident, independent”
the 1/2 of participants with negative words in 1st experiment rated donald as “reckless, conceited, aloof”

17
Q

why were the “donald” studies significant?

A

showed how schemas can influence opinions when they are both:

  • accessible
  • applicable
18
Q

In the study “excuse me, but what about actual behavior?” what did they test?

A
  • subjects had to either unscramble neutral, polite, or rude words
  • told to find the experimenter when finished, but they were immersed in conversation for 10 minutes
19
Q

what were the results of the word unscramble/find experimenter study?

A

those who unscrambled polite words 15% would interrupt

  • w/ neutral 40%
  • w/rude 60%
20
Q

confirmatory hypothesis testing is to answer the question:

A

do we seek information objectively, or are we inclined to confirm the suspicions we already have?

21
Q

Snyder & Swann: Confirmatory hypothesis testing experiment

A
  • interview person, told they were either extrovert or introvert
  • subjects made up different questions that lead to confirmation of original ideas
22
Q

results of Synder and Swann confirmatory hypothesis testing

A

even observers of the interview, blind to condition, saw the “extroverts” as more extroverted, and the “introverts” as more introverted

23
Q

we are less likely to use this confirmatory hypothesis technique if we:

A
  • if we are uncertain of our impression

- if we are concerned with the accuracy of the impression

24
Q

belief perseverance

A

the tendency to maintain a belief even after it has been discredited
(the explanation or theory about why the initial belief was true often survives)

25
Ross 1975 experiment with false feedback:
- gave people bogus feedback (succeeded or failed a social sensitivity test) - told feedback was false - then estimated the number of items they actually did get right or would get right on a similar test
26
results of ross 1975 experiment with false feedback:
those with false success feedback estimated higher scores on current and future tasks than those with fake failure feedback
27
what is one way we can reverse belief perseverance?
explain the opposite
28
what is confirmation bias?
the tendency to search for and interpret information that verifies existing beliefs
29
what was the hannah study?
participants saw one of two videos: high expectation (affluent) and low expectation (poor), then asked to predict her math and verbal skills after (no info or new info of her performance at school)
30
what were the results of the hannah study?
when performance not viewed- no difference in guessed performance of high and low expectation -but when performance viewed (the same for low and high), there was a difference in expectation of performance (higher for high expectation)
31
what is the attribution theory?
the way in which people explain the causes of their own and others' behavior
32
internal attribution:
inference that behavior is the because of something about the person, such as his attitude, character, or personality
33
external attribution:
inference that the behavior is because of something about the situation
34
what is the covariation model? (Kelley)
combines consensus information and distinctiveness information when determining if something is an internal or external attribution
35
in the covariation model, what is consensus information?
the extent that other people behave the same way in this situation
36
in the covariation model, what is distinctiveness information?
the extent to which one particular person behaves differently in various situations
37
when something is considered internal attribution it has:
low consensus | low distinctiveness
38
when something is considered external attribution it has:
high consensus | high distinctiveness