Lecture 5 - Social Influence Flashcards

1
Q

What is social influence?

A

The process whereby people directly or indirectly influence the thoughts, feelings and actions of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three different types of social infleunce?

A
  • Compliance/ obedience
  • Conformity
  • Minority influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is compliance/ obedience?

A

Change that goes against one’s own beliefs (i.e., public behavioural change not accompanied by private attitude change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is conformity?

A

Change that restructures one’s underlying beliefs (i.e., public behavioural change that is accompanied by private attitude change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is minority influence?

A

Process whereby numerical or power minorities change the attitudes of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Milgram 1963’s study’s aim?

A

To understand the extent to which people will obey orders even when aware they are causing harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Milgram’s 1963 study’s participants?

A

40 Male Participants recruited through newspaper advert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What year did Milgram vary his procedure?

A

1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Milgram Sample

A

Volunteer of 40 males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Milgram Method

A
  • rigged hat = confederates is learner and ppt as teacher
  • ppts gives a series of word pairs and if confederate gets wrong, ppt gives them an electric shock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Milgram Shock Levels

A

from 15V to 450V and went up in 15V increments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Milgram: what happens at 300V

A

learner falls silent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was Milgram’s experiment standardised

A

The confederates ‘noises’ as a response to the shocks were prerecorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgram: How many ppts went to 450V?

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Milgram: How many ppts stopped at 300V?

A

12.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Milgram Conclusion

A

Obey acts of evil not due to an evil disposition but a result of situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Milgram variation: less responsibility

A

Another confederate gives shocks
92% go to 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Milgram variation: Ally

A

Ally disagrees with experimenter
10% go to 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Milgram variation: Setting

A

Less prestigious setting of a run down office block
48% go to 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Milgram Variation: experimenter in everyday clothes

A

20% go to 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Milgram Variations: Absent experimenter

A

21% go to 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Milgram Variation: Learner in the same room

A

40% go to 450V

23
Q

What are the ethical considerations of Milgram’s study?

A
  • Milgram asked his colleagues what they thought would happen – but no such thing as an ethics committee
  • One participant had a heart attack, many experienced distress
24
Q

What methodological and data issues occur in Milgram’s study?

A
  • Gina Perry – examined archival materials from original studies
  • Reported that supervisors (i.e., authority figures) went off script, some participants were aware of the purpose of the study, and debriefing didn’t occur for months for some
25
Q

What alternative interpretation is there in Milgram’s study?

A
  • Reicher and Haslam – point out that the context of the study (see 1974 versions) can lead to variation in level of obedience
  • Importance of identification – with the scientific process, with the ”learner”…
26
Q

What was Sherif 1935’s study looking at?

A

The autokinetic effect

27
Q

What did Sherif do in his 1935 study?

A
  1. Asked participants to estimate how far a light moved on several trials:
    - Estimates converged on an idiosyncratic value (typical to that individual).
  2. Then asked people to estimate how far the light moved in groups of 2 or 3
  3. Finally, participants were asked to perform task once more alone …
28
Q

What did Sherif find in his 1935 study?

A
  • People need to be certain + confident in the correctness of their actions
    This situation was ambiguous and uncertain
  • People looked to others to help define “reality”
    Once developed, the norms anchor perceptions of reality

→ If social influence is the product of ambiguity, would people be less influenced if they could objectively measure movement?

29
Q

Asch’s line judgment task - how many ppts

30
Q

Asch - where were people sat

A

real ppt sat penultimate
rest were confederates

31
Q

Asch - confederates answers

A

same but incorrect 12/18 times

32
Q

Asch - ppts correct when confederate correct

33
Q

Asch - ppts correct when confederate incorrect

34
Q

Asch - how many ppt conformed

35
Q

Asch - how many ppts always conformed

36
Q

Asch - how many ppts never conformed?

37
Q

Asch - conclusion

A

Some conform even when clearly wrong

38
Q

Variables affecting Asch conformity - grp size

A

group size increase -> higher conformity but plateaus at 3/4

39
Q

Variables affecting Asch conformity - anonymity

A

reduced to 12.5%

40
Q

Variables affecting Asch conformity - ambiguity

A

high ambiguity led to high conformity - ISI

41
Q

Variables affecting Asch conformity - Ally

A

dropped to 5.5%

42
Q

What are the dual-process theories?

A

Normative and informational influence

43
Q

Who constructed the dual-process theory?

A

Deutsch & Gerard (1955)

44
Q

What is information influence?

A

Influence to achieve accurate perceptions - the want to be right

45
Q

What is normative influence?

A

Influence to gain approval and avoid rejection - the want to be liked

46
Q

What are the limitations of the dual-process theory?

A
  • The problem of “residual conformity”
  • Characterising other people as either sources of (valid) information or sources of (invalid) social pressure highlights dynamics of interpersonal dependency.
  • Ignores other forms of relationship between individuals and sources of influence, the importance of group belonging.
47
Q

What is the self-categorization theory?

A
  • argues that groups are part of the self - not just external influences
  • Groups (and other people) provide people with social identity, a sense of who they are and what that means
  • The influence of self-defining social groups is both informational and normative at the same time:
48
Q

What is the aim of Platow et al (2005)’s study?

A

To explore whether laughter depends on a shared sense of social identity

49
Q

What are the participant’s in Platow et al’s study?

A

60 undergraduate students

50
Q

What did Platow et al do in their study?

A

Asked participants to listen to a potentially funny recording and manipulated whether participants believed the audience was predominantly comprised of in-group or out-group members (as well as presence or absence of canned laughter), then rate how funny they found the recording

51
Q

What is minority influence?

A

→ Individuals have agency, and individuals can influence large majorities
→ Conflict, innovation and change are also important features of society

52
Q

What is Moscovici et al 1969 study?

A
  • In groups of 6, participants were presented with a blue slide (varying in intensity) + asked to name the colour

3 conditions:

  • Control (6 naïve participants/ no confederates)
  • Inconsistent minority (confederate said “green” 2/3 of time + “blue” 1/3 of time)
  • Consistent minority (confederate always said “green”)
53
Q

What are the theories of minority influence?

A
  1. Majority influence → direct public compliance
    - People accept what the majority has to say
    - Little or no private attitude change
    - Short-term change
  2. Minority influence → indirect, latent private change
    - People have to think about the minority and try to understand them
    - More enduring
    - Occurs through process of conversion