Lecture 2 - The Self Flashcards

1
Q

How did William James (1890) describe the self?

A

Containing two aspects: ‘I’ and ‘Me’

I: refers to the fact that I can be reflexivity aware of myself
Me: the knowledge I have about myself/ self-concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is our self-concept shaped by others?

A
  • How we imagine ourselves in their eyes
  • What we think they see
  • How they treat us
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is there cultural consistency in how we view ourselves?

A

American: creative, successful, intelligent
Chinese: mother/ father, brother/ sister, employee of X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ross, Xun, & Wilson (2002) study on multi-cultural self

A
  • Participants: 111 Chinese-born students in Canada
  • What did they do?: Complete an “I am…” task either in Chinese, or English
  • Found: For bicultural individuals, different identities are stored in separate knowledge structures that can be activated by using different languages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the cultural differences in ambiguity?

A

Eastern cultures: more likely to report experiencing different emotions at the same time - more ambiguous feelings

Western cultures: more likely to report feeling one emotion - find it hard to imagine feeling two opposing emotions at the same time (being non-ambiguous)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who proposed the social comparison theory?

A

Festinger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the social comparison theory?

A
  • Where things cannot be measured objectively, people look to others for cues about how things should be judged.
  • Judgments are made relative to available comparison standards
    → Whether something is “good” or “bad” depends on whether it is “better” or “worse”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain Klein (1997) study on social comparison and the self

A
  • Participants: 437 US college students
  • What did they do?: Told participants they had scored 40% or 60% on an aesthetic value judgment task + given information regarding average score (worse or better)
  • Findings: Absolute (measurable) information counts – 40% v 60% comparison

But so does relative (comparison) information – 20% worse v 20% better comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do we compare?

A

Most of the time we compare with similar others:

  • If they are good at X, then I should be, too
  • Serves self-evaluation motives

But sometimes we compare ourselves with dissimilar others:

  • Self-improvement versus self-enhancement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do we protect the self against unwanted comparisons?

A
  • Attainment and maintenance of positive self-concept is an important individual motivation (i.e., self-enhancement)
  • While we may have some choice in the comparisons we make, often we are confronted with unflattering comparisons
  • There are strategies people use to maintain positive self-views in the face of negative feedback
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is self-enhancement motive?

A

A lot of social psychological theories of the self assume that people are motivated to maintain a self-concept that is positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the self-verification motive?

A

Some have argued that an equally strong, if not stronger motive is for the self is to be seen accurately by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly