Lecture 5 - Attitudes and Persuasion Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of an attitude?

A

A cognitive representation that summarises an individual’s evaluation of a particular person, group, action or idea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of persuasion?

A

The process of forming, strengthening or changing attitudes via communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are 3 components of attitude structure and what do they each entail?

A
  • Cognition: facts and beliefs
  • Affective: emotions and feelings
  • Behavioural: past, present and future behavioural interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the principles of attitude structure?

A
  • Consistency (more agreement between the cognitive, affective and behavioural aspects of attitudes will lead to stronger and more predictable attitudes.)
  • Negativity bias, because negative aspects have a greater weight than do positive aspects.
  • Accessibility –> something which comes to mind quicker tends to be stronger.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Do stronger or weaker attitudes link more to our behaviour?

A

Stronger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does ELM stand for?

A

Elaboration Likelihood Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the ELM propose?

A

The Elaboration Likelihood Model proposes that there are two routes to persuasion, and the one that is selected will depend on the amount of elaboration (thought) about the message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who proposed the ELM?

A

Petty & Cacioppo, (1981) proposed the Elaboration Likelihood Model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the definition of elaboration?

A

The process of thinking about and scrutinising persuasive arguments, and generating reactions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

High elaboration leads to which route of persuasion?

A

Central route to persuasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the central route to persuasion?

A

The process by which a person thinks carefully about a persuasive message and is persuaded by the strength of it’s arguments and logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Low elaboration leads to which route of persuasion?

A

Peripheral route to persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the peripheral route to persuasion?

A

The process by which a person doesn’t think carefully about a persuasive message, and is instead persuaded by peripheral factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What features of an argument might someone pay attention to if they are using the peripheral route to persuasion?

A
  • Expertise of persuader
  • Attractiveness
  • Number of arguments (message length = message strength).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are two cognitive factors that influence the route to persuasion taken/which influence elaboration?

A
  • Capacity: to think carefully - does the situation/individual differences allow it?
  • Motivation: how much incentive do you have to think carefully.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two individual difference factors that influence the route to persuasion/amount of elaboration?

A
  • Need for cognition: how much each person is stimulated by thinking
  • Mood and emotion: positive moods signal safety, leading to more superficial processing. Negative moods may signal danger/that behaviour needs changing, leading to more systematic processing.
17
Q

Why can too much fear decrease persuasive power?

A

Too much fear can cause distress/discomfort, leading to a withdrawal/removal from the source of the fear to alleviate the unpleasant feelings.

18
Q

What is systematic processing equivalent to?

A

Central route

19
Q

What is superficial processing equivalent to?

A

Peripheral route

20
Q

Compare the routes to persuasion in terms of their effect on attitude change.

A

Central route/systematic processing leads to changes that are more long lasting and more resistant to counter-persuasion.

21
Q

What do we initially do when resisting persuasion?

A

Accept arguments that support our position, and counter-argue those that oppose.

22
Q

What is forewarning in terms of resisting persuasion?

A

Being informed that someone is going to try and persuade you.

Doesn’t work in actually resisting persuasion, however, as we over-estimate our ability to dismiss it

23
Q

What is forearming in terms of resisting persuasion?

A

Being informed of how someone is going to try and persuade you.

Isn’t very effective in resisting persuasion.

24
Q

How effective was the ‘just say no’ campaign against drugs?

A

Not at all. Doesn’t provide people with the relevant research/appropriate reasons for counter-arguments.

25
Q

Does inoculation against persuasion work, and why? Describe the research which supports this answer.

A

Yes. All 3; forewarning, forearming and counterarguments, are needed to resist persuasion effectively.

Children were informed that they were going to be persuaded t start smoking, how they were going to be persuaded, and were encouraged to generate their own counter-arguments. Groups that did this had lower incidences of smoking.

26
Q

What is subliminal persuasion?

A

Attempts to persuade using implicit primes/cues.

27
Q

What percentage of North Americans believe that subliminal persuading works well?

A

61%

28
Q

How effective is subliminal persuading?

A

Quite, but only under very strict conditions, i.e. when physiological drives are matched with the relevant psychological motives.

29
Q

Describe research which evaluates the effectiveness of subliminal persuasion.

A

Strahan et al., (2002) found that implicit exposure to thirst-related words increased the amount of water participants consumed, but only when physiologically thirsty (hadn’t consumed water for 2 hours).