Lecture 5: Alternative Models of Choice Flashcards
opportunity cost
the psychological factors and trade-offs involved when making decisions, particularly the value of the next best alternative that is forgone when a choice is made
- not only money but also resources
money should be fungible
a central assumption in the theory of consumer choice is the fungibility of money
- any unity of money is substitutable for another
- units of money don’t have unique attributes; they are all the same
- unique to money
mental accounting
describes the ways ordinary people think about money
- Kahneman and Tversky introduced psychological accounting
- Thaler uses mental accounting to describe mental representations and cognitive processes related to transactions involving money
mental account types
- minimal account
- topical account
- comprehensive account
minimal account
looks at just the direct costs and benefits of a decision without considering any other context
topical account
considers the decision in relation to a specific category or situation
comprehensive account
evaluates the decision based on overall resources, priorities, and goals
hedonic editing
people try to maximize happiness (where gains = pleasure; losses = pain)
- people use mental accounting to categorize money and hedonic editing to arrange these categories for maximum happiness
mental accounting & gains and losses
- gains: segregate
- losses: integrate
- mixed (gains): integrate
- mixed (losses): depends (losses much larger than gains: segregate) vs (losses only slightly larger than gains: integrate)
mental accounting & transactions evaluation
- acquisition utility: value of a good relative to its price
- transaction utility: perceived value of the deal (does the price seem fair in relation to a reference point?)
why we use mental accounting
self-control
- saving money is difficult
- overspending is easy
- controlling impulses is difficult, and ‘putting’ money/resources in different ‘buckets’ helps us to overcome the temptation and have more self control
reason based models
- fits how we normally talk about decisions
- helps us to understand conflict
- allows for comparative considerations
choice between equally attractive options
people choose the alternative that is higher on the aspect they consider more important
choosing vs rejecting
positive features of options will loom larger when choosing, negative features of options will be weighted more heavily when rejecting
impoverished vs enriched option
impoverished option
- fewer positive and fewer negative features
enriched
- more positive and more negative features
- the enriched option could be both chosen and rejected when compared to an impoverished option (parent A vs B custody of child)