Lecture 5: Alternative Models of Choice Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

opportunity cost

A

the psychological factors and trade-offs involved when making decisions, particularly the value of the next best alternative that is forgone when a choice is made
- not only money but also resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

money should be fungible

A

a central assumption in the theory of consumer choice is the fungibility of money
- any unity of money is substitutable for another
- units of money don’t have unique attributes; they are all the same
- unique to money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mental accounting

A

describes the ways ordinary people think about money
- Kahneman and Tversky introduced psychological accounting
- Thaler uses mental accounting to describe mental representations and cognitive processes related to transactions involving money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mental account types

A
  • minimal account
  • topical account
  • comprehensive account
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

minimal account

A

looks at just the direct costs and benefits of a decision without considering any other context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

topical account

A

considers the decision in relation to a specific category or situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

comprehensive account

A

evaluates the decision based on overall resources, priorities, and goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hedonic editing

A

people try to maximize happiness (where gains = pleasure; losses = pain)
- people use mental accounting to categorize money and hedonic editing to arrange these categories for maximum happiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mental accounting & gains and losses

A
  • gains: segregate
  • losses: integrate
  • mixed (gains): integrate
  • mixed (losses): depends (losses much larger than gains: segregate) vs (losses only slightly larger than gains: integrate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

mental accounting & transactions evaluation

A
  • acquisition utility: value of a good relative to its price
  • transaction utility: perceived value of the deal (does the price seem fair in relation to a reference point?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why we use mental accounting

A

self-control
- saving money is difficult
- overspending is easy
- controlling impulses is difficult, and ‘putting’ money/resources in different ‘buckets’ helps us to overcome the temptation and have more self control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

reason based models

A
  • fits how we normally talk about decisions
  • helps us to understand conflict
  • allows for comparative considerations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

choice between equally attractive options

A

people choose the alternative that is higher on the aspect they consider more important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

choosing vs rejecting

A

positive features of options will loom larger when choosing, negative features of options will be weighted more heavily when rejecting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

impoverished vs enriched option

A

impoverished option
- fewer positive and fewer negative features

enriched
- more positive and more negative features
- the enriched option could be both chosen and rejected when compared to an impoverished option (parent A vs B custody of child)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

principle of procedure invariance

A

a basic assumption in rational theory
- equivalent methods of elicitation yield identical preferences

17
Q

choose-reject discrepancy is not consistent with procedure invariance

A
  • the discrepancy is easily understood from a reason-based choice perspective
  • reasons for choosing are more compelling when we choose than when we reject
  • reasons for rejecting are more compelling when we reject than when we choose
18
Q

choice under conflict: seeking options

A

choosing often creates conflict as we are unsure which attributes matter to us or how to trade them off
- to solve it, we often seek reasons for choosing one option over another
- when choice is very hard, we might seek additional options, or to maintain the status quo
- the harder the choice, the more likely we are to search for new options
- a good reason for choosing an option reduces the temptation to seek more options

19
Q

choice under conflict: adding options

A

a principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives
- preference ordering between 2 options should not be altered by the introduction of additional alternatives
- thinking about people’s decisions in terms of reason-based choices reasons helps to explain violations of the principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives

20
Q

asymmetric dominance effect/decoy effect

A

occurs when the presence of a less desirable “decoy” option makes one of the other options appear more attractive, influencing decision-making

21
Q

the compromise effect

A

when an option is added to make the middle option the most attractive

22
Q

definite vs disjunctive reasons

A

once the outcome of the exam is known, the student has good although different reasons for taking the trip
- pass -> reward
- fail -> consolation and time to recuperate before a resit
- but when there is no result, there is no good reason to take the vacation

23
Q

formal modeling approach

A

associates a numerical value with each alternative, and characterizes choice as the maximization of value

24
Q

reason-based analysis

A

identifies various reasons and arguments that are purported to enter into and influence decision, and explains choice in terms of the balance of reasons for and against the various alternatives

25
Q

situations of dominance

A

there are clear and indisputable reasons for choosing one option over another
- reduces the tempation to look for additional alternatives

26
Q

tradeoff contrast (Simonson and Tversky)

A

the tendency to prefer an alternative is enhanced or hindered depending on whether the tradeoffs within the set under consideration are favorable or unfavorable to the alternative

27
Q

extremeness aversion

A

refers to the finding that within an offered set, options with extreme values are relatively less attractive than options with intermediate values

28
Q

weakness of disjunctive reasons

A

a number of studies contrast people’s willingness to reach a decision based on a definite reason for choice, with their reluctance to arrive at a decision in the presence of uncertainty about which reason is actually relevant to the case at hand

29
Q

purported reasons for choosing an option

A

the addition of purported reasons for choosing an option is seen to diminish the tendency for people to opt for that option, even though its value is not diminished

30
Q

acquisition utility

A

depends on the value of the good received compared to the outlay

31
Q

transaction utility

A

depends solely on the perceived merits of the ‘deal’

32
Q

local temporal budget constraints

A

the budget constraint that most influences behavior is the current income flow rather than the present value of lifetime wealth

33
Q

methods of raising price

A

steps can be taken to increase the perceived reference price
- explicitly suggest a high reference price
- increase the perceived cost of the product
- increase the minimum purchase required and/or to tie the sale of the product to something else
- make the transaction disutility less salient (sell the product in an unusual size or format)

34
Q

suggested retail price

A

in some cases SRP is equal to market price, in others, SRP exceeds the market price by as much as 100% or more
- a lower selling price will provide positive transaction utility
- inexperienced buyers may use the SRP as an index of quality

35
Q

budgetary rules

A

refers to how people mentally allocate their money into different “mental accounts,” which they use to guide their spending and decision-making. These accounts might be based on categories like necessities, entertainment, or savings. Once money is assigned to a particular account, people tend to spend it only within that category, even though money is fungible (interchangeable)