Lecture 5 Flashcards
philosophy
the desire or longing for wisdom or knowledge that is satisfied by applying reasoning or reason in exposing the illosory character of alleged trivialities
- looking at whether the world really is as you think it is
Francis Bacon
came up with a new way of reasoning, the inductive way
deductive vs inductive way
- deductive way is the way from the most general of axioms to the less general axioms and theorems
- inductive way calls for generalizing from sensory perceptions ultimately to the most general axioms (was revolutionary for the foundations of science as we now know it)
aspects of the scientific revolution
- rejection of method of authority
- acceptance of priority of observation over (possibly) faulty reasoning
- application of induction (generalizing based on a limited number of observations)
- stimulating the experiment
- rediscovery of mathematics as a tool for building models
Francis Bacon’s crucial points in Christianity
- more emphasis on Vita Activa (downwards) rather than Vita Contemplativa (upward)
- aim to restore God’s paradise, because the more we know about the world, the more control we have over nature (back to Adam and Eve’s paradise)
false ideas (idols/biases) we need to get rid of through induction and experimenting (science)
- idols of the tribe
- idols of the den
- idols of the market
- idols of the theater
how and why we should get rid of the false ideas and achieve sound reasoning
- according to Bacon, we can achieve sound reasoning via induction and experiments (science)
- according to Bacon we need to do this to regain control over nature like in the times of the Garden of Eden
pragmatism
the philosophy in which the practical is what counts, what you believe is what you do, and what you do is what you believe
- founding father Charles Peirce
the fixation of belief
one of Charles Peirce most important works
- states that the irritation of doubt causes a struggle to attain a state of belief (a state of rest)
- to leave behind feelings of doubt and uncertainty you need to inquire
- because the object of any inquiry is the settlement of opinion
- people are not concerned with the truth, they are concerned with relief from irritation, no matter if we are right or wrong
methods of belief fixation
- tenacity
- authority
- a priori
- science
tenacity
sticking to beliefs you already have
- pro: evades irritation of doubt efficiently
- con: social impulse is against it
authority
believing what a certain authority says
- pro: fixes belief in the community, sense of community
- con: some people possess a feeling of contingency about their belief
a priori
self-evident truths, and your reason following these standpoints
- pro: respectable from the view of reason
- con: can make you question the self-evident truth, ‘development of taste’
science
- pro: the ultimate conclusions of every person will be the same
- con: n/a
science in pragmatism
an inquiry under the assumption that the world is the way it is, independent of my opinion about the world (external pemanency)
How to Make Our Ideas Clear
another important work of Peirce
- tells us that many of the problems about the world we encounter, have to do with the confusion of the concepts
- to make concepts clear, you have to use these concepts in certain contexts
the pragmatic maxim
states that the meaning of concepts is connected to what we do with the concepts
- concepts are continuously evolving
John Dewey
an american pragmatist who was influential in education and social reform (democracy)
- argued for logic and that the purpose of thinking is to secure a stable equilibrium, as humans prefer a state of certainty instead of doubt
- inspired by Charles Darwin’s theory about natural organisms in general and human beings
Dewey’s methods of how we can deal with certain problems
- dogmatic
- critical
- axiomatic
- scientific
dogmatic
ideas are fixed, functions to solve conflict
- pro: shortcut to certainty
- con: complexity makes it unworkable
critical
with complexity comes critical cases; our beliefs are a result of us instead of the world (you need to get out of this stage)
- pro: deals with complexity
- con: a ‘clash of ideas’ leads to instability
axiomatic
from subjective reflection into method of proof, syllogistic logic
- pro: restores stability
- con: beliefs are only conditionally fixed. there is a restless feeling of relativism as you start questioning conclusions
scientific
the transition from the method of proof to the method of inference
- pro: makes the unknown known; science is a discovery rather than a justification
- con: n/a
reality is a flux
humans must adapt constantly