Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

4.2C Personality disorders > Lecture 4 > Flashcards

Lecture 4 Flashcards

Personality Organization

1
Q

Article McWilliams (2011): CH3. Overview of neurotic-borderline-psychotic spectrum. In psychoanalytic diagnosis: understanding personality structure in the clinical process

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure
  • Characteristics of psychotic-level personality structure
  • Characteristics of borderline personality organization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure

Now and then: how was neurotic seen back in the day?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

In Freud’s time: individuals with emotional distress short of psychosis = neurotic

Now: it’s called borderline or even psychotic features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure

Neurotic people rely on what kind of defense (oposite from healthy people)

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Neurotic rely on more mature or second-order defense (primitive defense is used but not prominent)

Healthier people use repression as basic defense, in preference to more indiscriminate solutions (denial, splitting)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure

Ego alien

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

= Egodystonic = pertaining behavior/attitudes that are inconsistent with one’s fundamental beliefs and personality

Much of psychopahtology of neurotically organized people is ego alien or capable of being addressed so that it becomes so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure

Therapeutic split

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Capacity of patient to distinguish between the observing and experiencing parts of the self

A paranoid man who is organized neurotically will be willing to consider the possibility that his suspicions derive from an internal disposition to emphasize the destructive intents of others, while a paranoid man at the bordeline or psychotic level will putt intense pressure on the therapist to join their conviction that their difficulties are external in origin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Characteristics of neurotic-level personality structure

Neurotic-level people have more or less succesfully traversed Erikson’s first 2 stages:

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Basic trust
  • Basic autonomy

And they have made at least some progress toward identity integration and a sense of initiative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Characteristics neurotic-level personality structure

Why do they seek treatment?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Not because of problems in essential security or agency, but because they keep running into conflicts between what they want and obstacles to attaining it that they suspect are of their own making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Characteristics neurotic-level personality structure

How does therapists feels after 1st session?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Feels that client and therapist are on the same side and that their mutual antagonist is a problematic part of patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Characteristics of psychotic-level personality structure

What are characteristics at psychotic end of spectrum?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

People are much more:
- Internally desperate
- Disorganized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of psychotic-level personality structure

How is it with people who are not in an overt state of psychosis?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

There are many people walking around whose basic psychotic-level does not surface unless they are under considerable stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of psychotic-level persoanlity structure

What are defenses they tend to use?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Withdrawal
  • Denial
  • Omnipotent control
  • Primitive idealization and devaluation
  • Primitive forms of projection and introjection
  • Splitting
  • Extreme dissociation
  • Acting out
  • Somatization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics psychotic-level

Waar hebben ze moeite mee?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Identity: so much, they may not fully be sure that they exist. deeply confused about who they are, struggle with: body concept, age, gender, sexual orientation.
  • They lack reflective functioning, trouble getting perspective on psychological problems –> maybe due to difficulties with abstraction
  • Energic aspects: they were expending so much energy fighting off existential terror that none was left to use in the service of coping with reality.
  • Boundary confusion: between outside en inside experience, and deficits in attachment that make it subjectively too dangerous for the psychotic person to enter the same assumptive world as the interviewer.
  • The nature of the primary conflict in people with a potential for psychosis is literally existential: life vs death, existence vs obliteration, safety vs terror
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics psychotic-level

Wat is positief?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • May induce a positive countertransference. This differs a bit from warm countertransference reactions to neurotic-level clients: one may feel more subjective omnipotence, parental protectiveness, and deep soul-level empathy toward psychotic people than toward neurotic ones. Psychotic people are so desperate for respect and hope that they may be derential and grateful to any therapist who does more than classify and medicate them. Their grattitude is naturally touching
  • They are particularly appreciative of sincerity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of psychotic-level personality structure

Why is it not difficult to diagnose patients who are in overt state of psychosis?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

They express hallucinations, delusions, and ideas of reference, and their thinking strikes the listener as illogical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of psychotic-level personality structure

What is a fear they have?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

People with psychosis have a core, immobilizing dread of their fantasied superhuman potential for destructiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics psychotic-level

Hoe komen ze over?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

One feels that a patient is not anchored in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics psychotic-level

Waarom willen therapeuten niet met ze werken?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

They are wonderful in their attachment, yet terrifying in their needs.

The consuming feature is one reason why many therapists prefer not to work with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics BPD

What are their defenses?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Use of primitive defenses:
- Denial
- Projective identification
- Splitting

–> They can be hard to distinguish from psychotic patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics BPD

Difference BPD - psychotic

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Primitive defense: when therapist confronts BPD with defensiveness: temporary respons. When therapist confronts psychotic: become further agitated
  • Reality testing: BPD demonstrate appreciation of reality no matter how crazy their symptoms look.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics of borderline personality organization

How to make differential diagnosis between BPD and psychosis

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Sense of reality

Kernberg (1984): investigating the person’s appreciation of reality by picking out some unusual feature of his or her self-presentation, commenting on it and asking if the patient is aware that others might find that feature peculiar.

The borderline person will acknowledge that the feature is unconventional and that outsiders might not understand its significance.

The psychotic person is
likely to become frightened and confused because the sense that he or she is not understood is deeply disturbing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics BPD

What do they think of therapist’s interest in their complixities

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

They dismiss interest in complexities of themselves and others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics BPD

How do they experience the self?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Full of inconsistency and discontinuity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics BPD

What do they “miss”?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • They are insecurely attached
  • Lack “reflective function” that finds meaning in own behavior and of others
  • They cannot mentalize –> lack theory of mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Characteristics BPD

What do they find difficult?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A
  • Affect tolerance and regulation –> go quickly to anger in situations others feel: shame, envy, sadness
  • Identity confusion –> but they know they exist
  • Observe own pathology –> come to therapy for other problems, such as depression
  • BPD clients seem to be in dilemma: when they feel close to other person, they panic (fear of engulfment and total control); when alone, they feel traumatically abandoned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Characteristics BPD

Wat zijn eerste clues dat client BPD heeft?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

Interventions that therapist intends to be helpful are perceived as attacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Characteristics BPD

Waar komt het vandaan volgens Masterson?

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

He saw BPD patients as fixated at the rapprochement sub phase of the separation-individual process, when the child has attained some autonomy yet still needs reassurance that a caregiver remains available and powerful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Characteristics BPD

Countertransference

McWilliams (2011) CH3

Countertransference is tegenreactie van therapist op transference van patient

A

Countertransference reactions tend to be strong and upsetting. Even when positive they may have a disturbing, consuming quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Characteristics BPD

Transference

McWilliams (2011) CH3

A

This tends to be strong, unambivalent, and resistand to ordinary kinds of intervention.

Therapist os perceived as all good or all bad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Article: Granieri et al. (2017) “The relationship between defense patterns and DSM-5 maladaptive personality domains

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • Defense mechanisms (which kinds)
  • Negative affectivity
  • Detachment
  • Antagonism
  • Disinhibition
  • Psychoticism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Defense mechanism

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Mental operation, usually unconscious, directed against the expression of drives and impulses

  • Serve to control the expression of unacceptable impulses and as reactions to external/internal sources of stess
  • Have specific function to protect self from anxiety, conflict, shame, loss of self-esteem, other unacceptable feelings/negative thoughts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Defense mechanism on a continuum in degree of maturity

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • More mature: great ability to adapt to reality, so they can effectively distance threatening feelings without distorting reality (sublimation, humor, suppression, altruism)
  • Immature/primitive: severe alteration of painful contents and/or radical distortions of external reality (projection, splitting, acting out, autistic fantasy)

Zie SV studeersnel (blauwe) voor hele tabel met alle soorten defence

19
Q

Findings

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  1. Immature defence predicted higher scores on maladaptive personality domains
  2. Increased use of immature DMs were positive predictor of psychopathology (PID-5-BF score)
  3. Mature DMs were negative predictors of psychopatholohy (PID-5-BF score)
20
Q

Negative affectivity

Nega affectivity was predicted by:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

An increased use of:

  • Reaction formation
  • Pseudo-altruism
  • Isolation
  • Displacement and projection
  • Acting out
  • Reduced use of humor
  • Suppression
20
Q

Negative affectivity is associated with which PDs?

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • avoidant pd
  • schizotypical pd
  • borderline pd
  • OCPD
21
Q

Negative affectivity is characterized by personality facets such as:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • anxiousness
  • emotional liability
  • hostility
  • perseveration
  • lack of or restricted affectivity
  • separation insecurity
  • submissiveness
22
Q

Negative affectivity

Reaction formation

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

= gevoelens onderdrukken door het tegenovergestelde gedrag aan te nemen.

Observed in APD and OCPD to control and transform disturbing emotional or cognitive components into the opposite to make it less threatening.

23
Q

Negative affectivity

Pseudo-altruism

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

= a pattern of behavior used by people who have a problem in coping satisfactorily with repressed rage. Observed in both individual and group psychotherapy, it allows the discharge of unacceptable impulses through professed concern about others

Significant and positive predictor of negative affectivity.

–> Displaying altruistic and prosocial might be an attempt to obtain approval and support from others in people with high levels of negative affectivity

24
Q

Negative affectivity

Isolation

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Allows individuals to manage anxiety/other painful states by separating the affective features of an experience or idea from its cognitive dimension

25
Q

Negative affectivity

Displacement and projection

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Displacement and projection of impulses, emotions, worries, behaviours, and inner aspects of the self may help people hide in negative affectivity to defend themselves from overwhelming feelings that are unconsciously perceived as potentially disorganizing.

26
Q

Negative affectivity

Acting out

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Is a general DM in BPD

A tendency to an immediate discharge of feelings or impulses for the inability to endure them and to reflect on the painful circumstances that determined them.

27
Q

Negative affectivity

Reduced use of humor and conscious suppression

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

May further reinforce the presence of negative feelings and the difficulty to deal with them.

28
Q

Detachment was predicted by:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • Older age
  • Higher levels of autistic fantasy
  • Isolation
  • Projection and lower levels of humor
  • Reaction formation
29
Q

Detachment seems to be associated with which PDs?

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • APD
  • OCPD
  • schizotypical pd
30
Q

Detachment expresses personality facets such as:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • anhedonia
  • depressivity
  • intimacy avoidance
  • suspiciousness
  • withdrawal
31
Q

detachment

Autistic fantasy

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

= an autistic retreat into an imaginary life to avoid facing unacceptable feelings or the unpleasant reality (imagining a bulb around you which makes it unable for anyone to touch you)

Represents schizoid pd defense against a conflict between the desire to get in touch with others and the fear of being engulfed and overwhelmed by others –> leads to social withdrawal

32
Q

Detachment

Reduced use of reaction formation

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Could indicate a lower tendency of these individuals to deny ambivalence

33
Q

Detachment

Isolation

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Organizing defense of OCPD

–>They overestimate mental and cognitive activity and avoid emotionally charged situations for fear if losing control and being vulnerable

34
Q

Detachment

Projection

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Concerns a wrongly attribution of one’s own unrecognized impulses, feelings and thoughts to others, so that the individual can avoid to deal with internal experienced that could make him/her feel excessively vulnerable.

35
Q

Antagonism was predicted by:

Granieri et al. (2017)

Antagonisme= manipulatief, grandiositeit, aandacht zoeken, ongevoeligheid, vijandigheid

A
  • male gender

a combination of higher levels of:

  • isolation
  • dissocation
  • autistic fantasy
  • pseudo-altruism
  • acting out

and lower levels of:

  • idealization
  • reaction formation
36
Q

Antagonism

Includes personality facets such as:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • attention seeking
  • callousness (ongevoeligheid)
  • deceitfulness
  • grandiosity
  • manipulativeness
37
Q

Antagonism

associated with which PDs?

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • ASPD
  • NPD
38
Q

Antagonism

what does the pseudo-self-sufficiency alow?

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

it allows individuals with increased antagonism traits to deny any need for care and love, and to defensively exclude from disturbing feelings (anger, resentment) toward a needed but frustrating or rejecting figure.

39
Q

Antagonism

autistic fantasy

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

sig predicted antagonism, suggesting general tendency of individuals with antagonistic traits to not engage emotionally with other people.

40
Q

Antagonism

Acting out

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

sig predictor, indicating tendency of people with high antagonism to act in potentially aggressive and destructive ways toward others and even themselves

41
Q

Antagonism

Pseudo-altruism

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

some people high in antagonism show a facade of altruistic attitudes –> facade hides that desires for power are enacted by unconsciously forcing other people to feel submissive and obliged toward the antagonistic indivual

42
Q

Antagonism

Decreased use in idealization

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

highlights their lower investment in values and capabilities of others

43
Q

Antagonism

Reduced use of reaction formation

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

could indicate a lower tendency of these individuals to feel guilt and to repair potential damage that they inflicted to others

44
Q

Disinhibition

was predicted by:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • younger age
  • lower levels of education
  • higher levels of acting out
  • dissocation
  • isolation
  • autistic fantasy
  • pseudo-altruism
  • lower levels of devaluation
  • anticipation
45
Q

Disinhibition

includes personality facets such as:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • distractibility
  • impulsivity
  • irresponsibility
  • lack of rigid perfectionism
  • risk taking
46
Q

Disinhibition

Associated with:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • NPD
  • ASPD
  • BPD
47
Q

disinhibition

acting out

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

considered one of most representative modalities of borderline functioning –> people with high disinhibition may act impulsively due to their difficulty integrating internal representations, reflecting on experience, and verbalizing feelings when they face stress and distrubing emotions.

48
Q

Psychoticism were predicted by:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Higher levels of
- Isolation
- Autistic fantasy

49
Q

Psychoticism

Includes personality facets such as:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • Eccentricity
  • Cognitive perceptual dysregulation
  • Unusual beliefs and experiences
50
Q

Psychoticism

Is associated with:

Granieri et al. (2017)

A
  • BPD
  • Schizotypical pd
51
Q

Psychoticism

What are difficulties for high psychoticism?

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

To effectively deal with emotional conflicts, which may lead to them compartmentalize the emotional aspects of the experience.

52
Q

Conclusion

Granieri et al. (2017)

A

Study supports the hypothesis that maladaptive personality traits are modulated by dominant defense patterns.

53
Q

Article: Perry & Bond (2012) “Change in defense mechanisms during long-term dynamic psychotherapy and five-year outcome”

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Study investigates changes in DMs during long-term dynamic psychotherapy, and how these changes relate to long-term improvements in psychiatric symptoms and functioning.

Hypothesis= DMs evolve in hierarchical manner, from less adaptive to more mature defenses, and that this improvement correlates with better psychological outcomes.

54
Q

Hierarchical levels of DMs

Perry&Bond (2012)

A
  1. Immature defense (lower-level defense)
  2. Neurotic defense (mid-level defense)
  3. Mature defense (higher-levels defense)
55
Q

Immature defense

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Least adaptive mechanisms and often more problematic in long term.

Involve: distorting reality or acting out that provides short term relief

Examples:
- action defenses (acting out, passive-aggressive): expressing internal conflict through actions, without conscious awareness of underlying emotions
- Disavowal and major image-distorting defenses (e.g., denial, projection): These involve rejecting or distorting reality in a way that protects the individual from difficult emotions but can worsen interpersonal relationships and emotional regulation.

56
Q

Neurotic defenses

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Still involve some level of distortion of internal experiences or reality.

They are more complex and allow greater daily functioning, but still prevent fully adaptive emotional responses.

EXAMPLES
- Repression: unconscious blocking of unpleasant thoughts and emotions
- Displacement taking it out on someone else

57
Q

Mature defense

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Allow to deal with stress and conflict in ways that are more aligned with reality and conducive to personal growth and healthy relationships.

EXAMPLES
- Suppression: consciously deciding to delay dealing with unpleasant emotions until more appropraite time
- Sublimation: redirecting unacceptable impulses into socially acceptable actions or goals (channeling aggression into sports)

58
Q

Results

DMs changes

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

DMs improved significantly, with lower levels of immature defenses and higher levels of adaptive defenses after therapy.

59
Q

Results

Predictors of change

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Patients with more severe psychiatric histories OR early chilhood trauma (sexual abuse) showed slower rates of defensive improvement.

60
Q

Results

Outcome correlation

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Improvements in DMs were strongly associated with long-term improvements in both symptoms and overall functioning.

Changes in DMs during therapy predicted better outcomes at the 5-year follow-up

61
Q

Discussion/conclusion

Perry&Bond (2012)

A

Study supports hypothesis that defensive functioning improves in a hierarchical manner during long-term dynamic psychotherapy.

Improvements in DMs are linked to better long-term outcomes –> suggesting that DMs play critical role in mediating therapeutic success

Results indicate importance of targeting defense mechanisms in therapy, particularly for individuals with complex psychiatric histories

4.2C Personality disorders (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions