Lecture 3: Personalization, Privacy concerns and Information sharing Flashcards
(without articles)
Privacy as right –> privacy as a commodity
While privacy stays a basic human right (see: Westin) we are progressively more likely to consider it a commodity (‘grondstof’), like time (in the form of work) or money.
Management of private information (zwick&dholakia, 2004)
- anonymity: sharing personal information while concealing real identity
- secrecy: sharing of little and potentially inaccurate information
- transparency: disclose large amount of personal information, accurate representation of self
- confidentiality: externalization of restricted but highly accurate information
privacy has been studied mostly in economic terms (Smith et al., 2011), leads to …
the idea that before disclosing personal information, users might carefully evaluate benefits and risks.
Privacy calculus (meaning)
“Individuals are assumed to behave in ways that they believe will result in the most favourable net level of outcomes” (Stone & Stone, 1990)
Privacy calculus (benefits)
Sharing Benefits are generally classified as belonging to three main categories:
- Financial Rewards: e.g. discounts, earnings, time saved
- Social Benefits: e.g. gaining access to specific groups you like, are important, or are beneficial to you
- Personalization: e.g. personalized offers, validation
Privacy calculus (risks)
Sharing Risks can be thought of as “the potential for loss associated with the release of private information to a firm” (Featherman & Pavlou, 2003).
- the likelihood of the risk –> the chance that information is “misused”
- the severity of the risk –> the consequences of this “misuse”
Privacy paradox
In fact, when assessing users’ perception of privacy versus their privacy-protecting behavior scholars have often found the results paradoxical
Limits of the privacy calculus
The privacy calculus presumes that users make
rational economic choicesat all time.
This is not true at all times:
Behavior quite often guided by “heuristics”
- Social proof
- Persuasive techniques by platforms
- “foot in the door”
- “door in the face”
- Affect heuristics
- “Framing” effects
Or, privacy fatigue
Theory of planned behavior
Privacy fatigue (definition)
“a sense of weariness toward privacy issues, in which individuals believe that there is no effective means of managing their personal information on the Internet”
privacy fatigue is primarily generated from:
- high demands and an inability to meet goals
privacy fatigue is a …
strategy of behavioral disengagement:
when trying to achieve a goal, fatigued individuals will disengage, rather than trying to solve the problem
privacy fatigue in relation to cynicism and emotional exhaustion