Lecture 25 Flashcards
______ previously described “abnormal” patterns of behaviour that were recognized only within specific cultural contexts
Culture-bound syndromes
Numerous different critiques of Western psychiatry (based on biomedical model) exist
* These include critiques by people who have experienced the mental healthcare system
* These contributors self-identify in many different ways using different terms, including:
◦ Psychiatric survivors
◦ Ex-patients
◦ Psychiatric prisoners, psychiatrically incarcerated
◦ Consumer–survivors
◦ Service users
◦ Mad people; those experiencing madness
- These represent a rejection of system-imposed diagnostic labels (i.e. “schizophrenic”), which are often homogenous and “essentializing”
People within the mental healthcare system have experienced a range of harmful treatments and rights/freedoms restrictions which are seemingly “justified” by the classification of people into diagnostic categories (which can be seen as labelling and pathologizing)
* These include:
coercion, restraint, forced confinement, criminalization, forced medication, and other inhuman treatments
define trepanning
- boring small holes in the skull to permit demons or spirits to escape
What is Ontology
- study of belonging
What is epistemology
study of knowledge
Diverse explanations for madness included…?
- religious, spiritual, and social explanations
- It was thought that all people had the potential for madness
- In some instances, madness was thought to be a means to truth or insight (or some form of “genius”)
What did the Hippocrates argue?
- Argued that madness had a natural (biological) cause - previously it was thought that bodily conditions were biological and madness was spiritually caused (gods)
- He thought that an imbalance in the four humours (black bile, yellow bile, blood, and phlegm) could cause madness
- This theory influenced treatment of madness into the 19th century (1800s)
What were the scientific advances which supported improved medical diagnosis during the 19th century (1800s)
- Pathology emerged as a science and allowed physicians to connect physical changes with illness (autopsies identifying diseased organs in ill individuals)
- However, madness or mental illness is rarely associated with visible structural abnormalities (unlike most physical conditions)
- While it is assumed that madness is a disease of the brain, there are many uncertainties- but the biological model remains dominant: assumption is that advances in science will allow us to observe the causal mechanisms in time (i.e. chemical imbalances)
The biomedical model can be considered a model of what?
“reality” and for “reality” (Clifford Geertz, an anthropologist)
- Provides an “aura of factuality” to our understanding of mental health and illness
- It is a worldview used to explain phenomena and to justify treatments
(medications, involuntary hospitalization) – but it is not proven - We can view psychiatry as a cultural system, like religion, which expresses a view of the world, and provides guidance about how to act or function
The biomedical model has been critiqued in a number of ways:
◦ Some argue that it is best seen as “a myth”
◦ Others point to the diagnostic process as a means of social control and surveillance
◦ Some argue that inequities in power and control are mediators of mental illness
◦ Colonialism has been identified as causing mental distress and illness
explain anti-psychiatry
- Emerged as a challenge to mainstream psychiatry
- Since 1960s onward, critiques from scholars like R.D. Laing, Thomas Szasz (who said biomedical models are a myth) and Michel Foucault have been important
- Viewed diagnostic process and labelling with disorders as a form of social and political control
- Mental illness is a fundamentally political issue, deeply connected to broader contexts and systems of power
- Social, political and philosophical context and dynamics shape our understandings and responses to mental health and illness
- Considered by mainstream psychiatry as a “fad”, but a rather dangerous one
— essentially a challenge to mainstream (orthodox) psychiatry
explain critical psychiatry movement
- Seeks to analyze the social role and ideas of the profession (social perspective)
- Aims to avoid the polarization that anti-psychiatry produced
- Contests the notion that mental illness is reducible to a disease of the brain – argues that the mind is a more holistic construct than just the brain
What does the critical psychiatry movement critique?
- Critiques the “technological paradigm” applied to understanding mental illness (e.g., mechanistic), and suggests that this is an insufficient rationale for treatment
- Critiques “mechanistic understandings”: mental illness is due to faulty cognitive or emotional processing
What does conventional psychiatry assume?
that causes of brain pathology or faulty psychological processes will eventually be discovered, but in the interim this provides a justification for psychiatric treatment
◦ Objectifies people by reducing problems to brain disease/psychological mechanisms
◦ In the view of Critical Psychiatry, conventional psychiatry is part of the problem rather than the cure