Lecture 21: evolution of coop breeding Flashcards
Cooperative breeding: Birds =
4-9% of species
Cooperative breeding: Fish
20+ species
Cooperative breeding: Mammals
3% of species
Ecological constraints hypothesis
Emlen 1982
-coop breeding evolves through 2 steps
- -independent breeding is constrained –> habitat saturation/ecological constraints)
- -grown offspring delay dispersal and “stay at home”
- -grown offspring help to rear later broods
- exp evidence, red constraints = red help
- –sociable weaver Covas et al 2004
Ecological constraints hypothesis explain cooperative breeding ____ species
WITHIN
— but y don’t non-breeders help in all species?
phylogeny & cooperative breeding
there is a strong phylogenetic component to cooperative breeding
- evolved in some lineages but not others
- -strong phylogenetic tree for birds, hence y its useful
hypothesis 1: Ecology constrains breeding birds
- African Starlings (45 spp.)
- some coop, some not
- classify habitat (savannah/non savannah)
- found coop associated w particular habitat, all in savannah hab (non coop mostly non savannah)
- sav habitats less predictable (rainfall)
& a global example (temp variation and rainfall years of environments across globe), coop associated w variation in rainfall
hypothesis 1: Ecology constrains breeding mammals
Lukas & Glutton-Brock 2017
- Global study rainfall and temp, coop seen highest in areas of variation
cooperative breeding evolves in unpredictable environments?
Evidence not conclusive, OR does cooperative breeding allow colonisation of harsh environments
hypothesis 2: benefits of philopatry (staying at home) select for delayed dispersal
- Dickinson & McGowan
- Western Bluebirds
- sons usually spend the winter on their natural territory, & may help in following year
- mistletoe is key resource (disrupt this how much)
- more sons stayed when mistletoe removed
constraint on dispersal =
benefit of staying
- different sides of the sam coin
- equal each other
- the ecological constraints hypothesis & benefits of philopatry hypothesis differ only in the emphasis places on the process and cons of staying/leaving
hypothesis 3: Life history hypothesis
- life history traits predispose some lineages to cooperate
- slow life histories reduce rate at which breed gin vacancies arise
- more likely for offspring to delay dispersal and stay at home
- -> looked at longevity, clutch size and migratory etc
- -SPECIES W SLOW LIFE HISTORIES = COOPERATIVE UNDER CERTAIN ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS, short-lived large clutches never cooperate whatever the conditions
- HORNBILLS
slow life histories
(life long time breed quite a bit, small clutch sizes) invest a lot in breeding
life history traits: slow vs short and tropical vs temperate
slow = tropical
short = temperate
—-> so is it not just a correlate?
hypothesis 4: cooperative breeding is associated with brood parasitism
- superb fairy wren is parasitised by Horsfields bronze cuckoo
- cuckoo makes sense y pick cooperative species (more food) (chicks heavier more likely to fledge)
- superb fairy wren pick coop as better defence to parasitism (less parasitism found in larger groups)
- global distributions of brood parasitism and coop match, direction of association is uncertain tho (who picked who)