Lecture 20: Levels of selection Flashcards
Wynne-Edwards
‘Old’ group selection
- reproductive self-restraint to avoid over exploitation of resources
- conditions for old group selection are unlikely to be met in nature
- selfish gene likely to spread
‘old’ group selection demolished by
George Williams and Richard Dawkins ‘the selfish gene’
how can old group selection work?
if groups die out faster than others, but individuals die quicker than groups, so individual selection will be more powerful
- groups must be isolated so selfish individuals can’t move between them
- groups w just coop, they do better than just selfish, groups w both selfish will override over generations BUT VERY UNLIKELY TO OCCUR IN NATURE
‘New’ group selection: who and how does it differ
- EO wilson, david wilson & martin Nowak
- should look at selection as a multilevel process (genes, cels, organisms, group) David wilsons russian doll concept
New group selection: explanation =
-populations are divided into ‘trait groups’ or demes
- selection acts for or against traits within groups
-groups mix together before splitting into new groups and the next round of selection
===
- coop groups contribute more to next gen, self biased ones less
- they tend to associate w same trait (C&C, S&S) before forming new group
New group selection: cooperative traits will spread when
between group selection is stronger than within group selection
cooperation is favoured by:
- increasing group benefits
- reducing individual cost
- reducing within-group genetic variance, relative to between-group genetic variance (when regroup they regroup w same, C&C)
- relate to hamilton rule
new group selection models are mathematically equivalent to
hamilton rule for the evolution of altruism; rB>c
if new group selection models and inclusive fitness theory are mathematically equivalent, are they also as useful?
NO.
- inclusive fitness theory tells us that quantity which is maximised by natural selection under all conditions
- new group selection model is restrictive, not same generality
empirical study:to show group selection
social spider:
- colony extinction is frequent
- limited dispersal
- colonies have a mix of docile & aggressive phenotypes, site specific (affect success of colony)
- artificial colonies of mixes of docile / aggressive phenotypes at diff sites
- 2 gen monitored
- mix gens change to match original mixture
- suggest group trait is locally adapted
-criticised tho, not down to individual selection? Much scepticism
conditions for group selection to operate are extremely __ in nature
limited