lecture 2) visual dev cont and motor deev Flashcards
do infants show a prerence to new or familiar stim
familiar stim
what will causee infants to. shift their preference to a novel stim
prolongued or repeated exposure
true or false: prolongued or reepeated exposure to a sttim wil lcause infants tto shift their preeference to a novel stim
true
what determines whether an infant will show a familiar or novelty preference
lenght of exposure
short exposure = what type of prefernce
familiarity
long exposure = what type of prefernce
novelty
what is the main implication for the familiary vs novelty preference
exposure time in lab induced preference produces need to be long enough for the baby to become familiar with the stimulis but short enough so that they dont get bored (habituation)
what is the trial and duration of preference procedures
there is usually only one familiarzation trial that is brief
what is the trial and duration of the habituation paradigm
they need to repeat the preesentation of a stimulus enough times to ensure that the infant is bored
(many trials)
what is the definition of boredom
usually indexed as 50% reduction in looking time for 3 trials in a row compared to intial trials
what is perceptual constancy
the perception of objects as being constant in size, shape, colour etc in spite of physical differences in retinal image of the object
give an example of perceptual constancy in adults
when door is opening and closing the shape changes but we are sttill have to perceive the door as rectabgle rgardless
in the study about perceptual constancy in fancts what were they testing
if perceptual constancy preseent from birth
in the study about perceptual constancy in infants, what paradigm did theey use
habituation paradigm
explain tthe habitation for the perceptual constancy experiment
repeadly show infant a small cube
cube shown at diff distances at each trial (causing retinal image to changee from trial to trial)
= do infants perceive these as the same object or as diff objects
explain tthe test for the perceptual constancy experiment
show infant the orinal (smaller cube) and an identical larger cube but the larger one was further away so that both cubes projected the same size retinal image
if baby had perceptual constancy (understand that distance does not physically change tthe object), what would their reaction be to the cubes
they sbould look att the larger cube longer since they are used tio tge smaller cube
if baby did not have perceptual constancy (understand that distance does not physically change tthe object), what would their reaction be to the cubes
they will look ewually at botth cubes
if infants looked longer at the larger. but further away cube in the perceptual constancy test, what does this indiicate
that they see the large cube as different in size from the original smaller cube (even if it seems the same size)
=means that infants saw the repeated presentations of the original, small cube as a single object of small consttant size, even though the retinal image varied
what did tthe results of the perceptual constancy in infantst suggest
that perceptual consatncy is present from birth
what is object segregation
the ability to identigy tthat objects are seperate from each other
what is the most important cue for infancts in terms of object segregated
movement
(seperate objects move independantly of each other)
what was the question of study for oobject segregation in infatnts
if object segreation present from birth
is perceptual constnactt present from birth
yes
is object segregation present from birtth
no
what paradigm did they use for the objectt segregation srugy
habitaution
what was the habituation for the object segregation study
repeatly watched a video of a rod moving side to side behind a box
(do infants see the rod as a single rod or 2 seperaete shotr rods)
what was the test for the onject segregation
shown 2 rods stimuli moving side to side
(one rod vs broken rod)
what were the resulst of the objectt segregation test
4 months: preferred to look at broken rod (see broken rod as novel)
=indicates that they undeerstood that hte rod behind the box is one object
=have object segregation
rtue or false: 4 monh olds havee object segregation
true
what were the results for new borns in the object segregation test
they looked rhe same amount of time at the broken road and the single road
=indicattes that they did not understand that the rod behind the box was a single object
=dp not have object segregation
is objcet seegregation innate
no , has to be learned with eexperience
what is the most important depth clue
binocular disparity
what is binocular disparitty
diff bewteen the retinal image of an objec tin each eye that results in two slightly different signals being sent to the brain
=visual corttez combines differing neural signals caused by binocular density
when does depth perception occur according to the slope study
- months
true or false: there is a sensitve period for binoclar vision
true
wha tis a sensitve period
a ttime period during which experiences shapes the dev of an ability more than att other times
what is the sensittve period for bincolar vision
birth to 3 years old
what is depth perception from binolar disparity the result of (how do we get this normal depth perception)?
brain maturation as long as the infant receives normal visual input
what happens if infants do not receive normal visual input by the age of 3
theey may fail to develop normal binolccular vision and have life long difficults with depth percepttion
what is an example of something that would impede binoccular vision
cataracts
sttrapismus
true or false: monocular depth cues are perceived with 2 eyes
false, one
when is monocular deptth cues perceives
6-7 months
whatt is the reason that 6 months old will not craw over visual cliff but ypunger will
monocoular depth cues
true or false: depth percepttion needs to be dev thru experience
true
why will infants younger than 6 months craw right over the visual cliiff
they havent developped moonocular depth clues
explain visual dev at birtth
rudimentary visual scanning, poor acuity, preference for high contrast, minimal colour vision, preference for faces vs non faces and perceptal consgtance
explain visual dev at 2 months
colour vision appears
explain visual dev at 4 months
object segregation and binocular depth percepttion appear
explain visual dev at 6 months
face generalist, monolular depeth percepttion occurs
explain visual dev at 8 months
visual scanning, visual acuity and colour percepion similar o adultts
explain visual dev at 9 months
face specialists tthrough perceptual narrowing
what parts of visual develpment are innate
perceptual constancy and preference for faces
which parts of visual dev improve wiht brain maturation
visual acuity, colour perception and visual scanning
which parst of visual dev depend on experience dependent processes
object segreation
face perception (perceptual narrowing)
depth perceeption (sensitivee period for binocular vision)
what is intermodal perception
the coordinated peercepttion of singular object or event through 2 or more sensory systtems
what are the sensory systems usually paired in intermodal percetion
vision and at least 1 other sensory modality
ttrue or false: intermodal percepttion is presentt very early on
true
whatt was the question asked for the study about intermodal perception for touch and vision
can newborns integratet touch and vision
what was the study for combining vision and touch (intermodal perception)
infants sucked on a pacifer that they couldnt see and then used the preferental looking procedure: they got a picture of the pacifier they sucked on vs a pacifier of a diff shape and texture
what paradigm was used for intermodal perception of vision and touch
preferential LOOKING
what were the results of the intermodal study ocmbining vision and touch
newborns looked longer at the pacifier they sucked on (ie looked at familar pacific)
=able to distinguish and choose the familar without even seeing it