Lecture 2: Geography Flashcards
How does Geography affect Development?
Some countries are ‘doomed’ to not develop
Tropical: 1.5% points slower growth; 7 years lower life expectancy
Landlocked: 0.6% points slower growth
also Africa and east Asian countries most underdeveloped
Why? does geography affect development
- Transportation and coordination costs limit trade and globalization
- Climate limits agricultural and labour productivity(Sachs 2001)
- Burden of tropical disease reduces growth by 1% point 627,000 people died of malaria in 2020(CDC 2021)
- ‘Eurasian’ crops, animals and technologies cannot be transferred to tropical contexts(Diamond 1997)
- Vulnerability to natural disasters damages infrastructure and causes conflict
(Harari and La Ferrara 2012)
why is geography not enough?
- Tropical/landlocked countries can develop
°Singapore, Shenzhen/Guangzhou, Costa Rica;Botswana, Switzerland
°Challenges are not permanent, eg. Cuba,Paraguay have eliminated malaria - Local variations in development where geography is fixed
Even with the same geography, development levels can differ significantly - A lack of convergence
°Differences in crops, animals and technologies have been eradicated by trade
°Why is Nicaragua still poor today? - A ‘reversal of fortunes’
°The US has overtaken Latin America
°But Central America has not, despite hosting the Mayans and Aztec
Tropical and landlocked places used to be rich geography hasn’t changed
- How do Natural Resources affect Development?
Resource curse –> Countries with natural resources are poorer not richer
Economic Effects: of the resources
- Commodity prices decline relative to manufactured goods over time – the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis
- Commodity (raw material) prices are volatile
- No spillovers to the rest of the economy
- Dutch Disease - Selling commodities pushesup the exchange rate, harming other exports
- Male-dominated mining areas create gendered risks and inequality
°Eg. an increase in HIV/AIDS (de Soysaand Gizelis 2013)
°Eg. La Rinconada, Peru - 4,500 womensex trafficked (>10% of the population)(Miranda 2016)
°But all can be mitigated and managed withcareful government action (Ross 1999)
Stabilization funds,
Investing in diversification(Atlas of Economic Complexity 2023)
Political Effects: of the resources
- Myopia: Due to ‘easy’ money that finances patronage
But leaders often try to stay for decades - Capture/Corruption: Beneficiary interest groups
°(subsidized industries) lobby to keep rents
°But resource states are rich enough to resist - Authoritarianism: Leaders more secure and transition to democracy less likely
°But more revenue also reduces elite’s fear of taxation under democracy - Conflict: Extortion & fighting for resource control
°But resources can fund security forces - Rentier states: Competition focused on controlling the state for wealth
°Less need for tax collection undermines the
social contract
Political Rents
Definition:
Unearned incomes gained through political influence rather than productive efforts.
Key Features:
Often linked to resource wealth
Common in corrupt systems, where elites use political power to secure economic benefits.
Examples:
🔹 Leaders using oil revenues to fund patronage networks.
🔹 Powerful groups lobbying for subsidies or favorable regulations to maintain their wealth.
Impact:
Weakens economic efficiency.
Reduces government accountability.
Can fuel authoritarianism and conflict.
Under what conditions do natural resources harm development?
- When they generate large, state-controlled rents
- When resources are controlled by nationalized firms (Ross 2012)
- When institutions are weak already (Mehlum et al 2006)
When the political institutions are weak biggest effect of the natural resources!