Lecture 19: Development, Plasticity, and Aging Flashcards
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
The study of how cognitive functions develop over time, and
what brain changes underlie development
Synaptogenesis
Formation of synapses
* Synapses form long before birth (prior to week 27)
* Doesn’t reach peak density until after birth (first 15 months)
* Goes “from inside out” deep (e.g., midbrain) to superficial layers
(e.g., cortex)
* At the same time, neurons are growing longer dendrites, extending
their axons and undergoing myelination
Synaptic elimination (“pruning”)
Elimination of synapses
following synaptogenesis
* Lasts for more than a decade
* Considered to reflect “fine tuning” of neural connectivity, removing
redundant or non-functional connections
Synaptogenesis & Synaptic Elimination
Synaptic density peaks early, starts to decline almost immediately after
Pattern is different for grey and white matter, and differs according to region
Critical period
Time window in which appropriate
environmental input is essential for learning to take place,
and this learning is hard to reverse in the face of later
experience
Filial imprinting (Lorenz)
Ducklings identify their parent by
forming an attachment to a moving object seen in a
particular time window (15 hours to 3 days) – hard to form
attachments to new “parents” after this time
However, subsequent research suggests that timing of window is
flexible (e.g., if no moving object is seen) and can be changed
gradually
* Suggests a sensitive period (more flexible than critical period)
Critical period for language acquisition is thought to end during
adolescence, after puberty (Lenneburg, 1967)
* However, different aspects of language may have different sensitive
periods (e.g., discriminating between phonemes is set at infancy,
whereas accents are more fluid during infancy but become harder to
change in adulthood)
The Adolescent Brain
- Adolescents tend to make risky decisions and engage in
risky behaviors - Traditional cognitive neuroscience explanation: Frontal lobes develop slowly (not fully developed in adolescents), and as a
consequence, adolescents show immature executive
function and poor impulse control
However, younger kids have underdeveloped frontal lobes, yet
you don’t see as much risky behavior there…
- Alternative explanation by Casey et al. (2008): In addition to
slow development of frontal lobes, the limbic regions
(responsible for emotional arousal and sensitivity to reward)
develop more quickly
Heightened emotional
reactivity
(from faster-developed limbic
regions)
+
Underdeveloped
executive/impulse control
(from slowly developing
frontal regions)
=
Risky adolescent behavior!
The Adolescent Brain
* Tested using
“Go/No-go task”:
* Participants see a series of faces, and are asked to make a “go”
response (i.e., press a button) to fearful faces or a “no-go” response
(i.e., don’t press button) to neutral faces
Measured amygdala activity
for fearful and neutral
expressions
Adolescents have heightened amygdala
responses, regardless of whether they’re
responding to a fearful face or not
The Adolescent Brain: Cognitive Control in
Emotional Context
Aging
Aging is associated with declines in speed of processing, working
memory processes, and long term memory … but it’s also
associated with increases in acquired world knowledge
Aging is associated with declines in speed of processing, working
memory processes, and long term memory … but it’s also
associated with increases in acquired world knowledge
* Brain volume decreases throughout life, but decline is not uniform
in all regions
Hippocampus,
caudate nucleus,
cerebellum, and
lateral PFC show
reductions with age
Aging and Brain Activity During Encoding and Retrieval
2 commonly observed patterns:
* Under-recruitment of frontal resources
* Non-selective recruitment of frontal resources
Under-recruitment of Frontal Resources
- Self-initiated encoding task: Remember a bunch of words
from a list - Usually, self-initiated encoding recruits the left inferior frontal
cortex (LIFC)
Older adults significantly under-recruit LIFC (i.e., less
activity in this region) during the task, compared with young
adults
- However, if you give them a support strategy (e.g., an
effective semantic coding task that requires deeper
encoding), then they show same levels of LIFC activity as
young adults
Non-selective Recruitment of Frontal
Resources
- Younger adults selectively recruit the left frontal area, not the right
- However, older adults have nonselective recruitment of frontal
resources (i.e., more equally recruit both left and right frontal regions)
With strategy support (i.e., deeper semantic encoding), both
younger and older adults show improved memory
performance, but older adults still show non-selective
recruitment of bilateral frontal areas
- Non-selective recruitment appears in many other episodic
memory retrieval tasks (e.g., word-pair cued recall, word-stem
cued recall, word recognition, face recognition)
Is non-selective recruitment in older adults adaptive and
compensatory, or a sign of breakdown?
Logic:
* If it’s adaptive, then older adults who perform well on memory
tasks should show greater non-selective, bilateral recruitment of
frontal regions
* If it’s a sign of breakdown, then older adults who perform well on
memory tasks should show less non-selective recruitment of
frontal regions (more left-lateralized)
Older adults who do well on tasks show more bilateral activation, whereas
older adults who do poorly show more lateralization
* Thus, non-selective recruitment seems to be a compensatory adaptation
Brain Plasticity
Old view:
The adult human brain is static and fixed, growth of neurons
stops once we reach adulthood
The adult human brain is plastic and changes in response to
experience; it is also capable of neurogenesis
(formation of new neurons)
- Neurogenesis is now well established in several brain
regions, especially the hippocampus - Maybe helps us keep one memory separate from another?
- Amount of neurogenesis correlates positively with learning and
hippocampal-dependent memory