Lecture 13 Flashcards
Gestalt approach to object perception
The whole differs from the sum of its parts.
Principles of perceptual organization
The whole differs from the sum of its parts.
looking at a limited set: what’s most likely given what i’m likely to see
– Perception is not built up from sensations, but is a result of
perceptual organization. [strong top-down influence]
– The mind (somehow) makes simple assumptions about objects in
order to recognize them in the environment. (didn’t know anything about the neuroscience involved)
Principles of perceptual organization
8 principles for organizing objects within perceptual scenes have
been offered:
1) pragnatz (good figure/simplicity),
2) similarity,
3) good continuation,
4) proximity (nearness),
5) common region,
6) uniform connectedness,
7) common fate,
8) meaningfulness.
pragnatz
the simplest interpretation: cognitively keeping your resources as limited as possible in trying to solve a problem: NOT overthinking
when you see a scene, assume it’s the simplest possible version of that scene
ex: the olympic rings
(good figure/simplicity)
• Every stimulus is seen as
simply as possible
• The easiest interpretation
takes fewer cognitive
resources.
wouldn’t try to break it up into all the possible objects it could be
similarity
try to group objects by some feature that they have in common
• Similar things are grouped together
• Color is one measure of similarity, but it could
be shape, texture, orientation, etc. = feature that is easy to find
good continuation
when you’re looking at lines within a scene, you’re going to try and keep things as smooth as possible
our visual system makes the assumption that things continue in nice, smooth curves; rather than break it off and continue in a different direction
• Connected points resulting in straight or smooth curves belong together.
– Lines are seen as following the smoothest path
– Holds true even complex images
common region
you’re going to group objects if they’ve been somehow defined graphically as belonging to one another
- elements in the same defined region tend to be grouped together: within a border
proximity
we tend to group things that are a little closer together than other things
- things that are near to each other are grouped together
uniform connectedness
connected regions of visual stimuli are perceived as a single unit
meaningfulness (familiarity)
looking at a complex scene, you’re going to intuitively form groups out of stimuli that seem to go together and form something that means something to you
Stimuli form groups if they appear familiar or meaningful
hidden faces: impose meaningful patterns
common fate
as things move together we’re going to see them as an object
Things moving in same direction are grouped together
do any principles override others?
some are really important (pragnatz) but they’re really heuristics - they give you better answers by narrowing down the answers
we kinda use them all together
Gestalt theorists were also
interested in figure-ground
segregation –
how you pick out objects from a complex visual scene
what is the figure within a scene and what is the background: what rules can you apply to figure that out
Properties of figure and ground:
– The figure is more “thinglike” and more memorable than ground.
– The figure is seen in front of the ground.
– The ground is more uniform (e.g. one color or texture) and extends behind the figure.
– The contour separating figure from ground belongs to the figure (border ownership).
Factors that determine which area is
the figure:
– Elements located in the lower part of displays (bias to seeing things on the bottom as a figure)
– Units that are symmetrical
– Elements that are small tend to be more figure-like (slight bias)
– Units that are oriented vertically (slight bias)
– Elements that have meaning