Lecture 11 - Punishment and Avoidance Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between avoidance and punishment?

A

An avoidance procedure involves a negative contingency between an instrumental response and the aversive stimulus. If the response occurs, the aversive stimulus is omitted. By contrast, punishment involves a positive contingency: the target response produces the aversive outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between active and passive avoidance?

A

In avoidance, safety is achieved by doing something. Hence, avoidance conditioning is sometimes referred to as active avoidance. With punishment, increased safety is achieved by not doing something. Hence, punishment is sometimes called passive avoidance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between avoidance and classical conditioning?

A

In an avoidance procedure, the response affects whether the US is present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is discriminated, or signaled, avoidance?

A

Methods for studying the importance of the warning signal in avoidance procedures and the relation of the warning signal to the US and the instrumental response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between an avoidance or escape trial?

A

avoidance - making the response before US is delivered

escape - instrumental response results in escape from shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is shuttle avoidance?

A

On successive trials, the animal shuttles back and forth between the two sides of the apparatus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference between two-way shuttle avoidance and one-way avoidance?

A

two-way shuttle avoidance
animal moves from left to right on the first trial and then back the other way on the second trial.

one-way avoidance
animal is placed on the same side of the apparatus at the start of each trial and always moves from there to the other side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

A

classical conditioning of fear to the CS

instrumental reinforcement of the avoidance response through fear reduction - negative reinforcement

Because of this, the instrumental response is reinforced by a tangible event (fear reduction) rather than merely the absence of something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the escape from fear (EFF) procedure?

A

condition fear to a CS with a pure classical conditioning procedure in which the CS is paired with the US regardless of what the animal does. In the next phase of the procedure, the participants are periodically exposed to the fear-eliciting CS and allowed to perform an instrumental response to turn off the CS (and thereby reduce fear).

EFF experiments have generally upheld the predictions of the two-process theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was found during Independent Measurement of Fear During Acquisition of Avoidance Behavior?

A

conditioned fear and avoidance responding tend to be correlated only early in training. After that, avoidance responding may persist without much fear being exhibited when the CS or warning signal occurs

Subsequent test trials indicated that the participants were not afraid of Stimulus A because they had learned to prevent shock on A trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is response blocking?

A

extensive exposure to the CS without the US where the participants cannot be permitted to terminate the CS prematurely

also called flooding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is flooding?

A

response blocking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does response blocking/flooding work?

A

they permit the return of fear and thereby make fear more accessible to extinction

makes it clear that failure to make the avoidance response is no longer dangerous, which should disconfirm previously acquired shock expectancies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is nondiscriminated or free-operant avoidance?

A

(no external warning stimulus in the situation)

In a free-operant avoidance procedure, the aversive stimulus (e.g., shock) is scheduled to occur periodically without warning (e.g., 10 s). Each time the participant makes the avoidance response, it obtains a period of safety (e.g., 20 s), during which shocks do not occur. Repetition of the avoidance response before the end of the shock-free period serves to start the safe period over again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Free-Operant Avoidance Learning

How is the rate of responding controlled by the length of the S–S and R–S intervals?

A

The more frequently shocks are scheduled in the absence of responding (the S–S interval)

Increasing the duration of safety produced by the response (the R–S interval)

The safe period produced by each response (R–S interval) has to be longer than the interval between shocks that would occur without responding (S–S interval).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Alternative Theoretical Accounts of Avoidance Behavior

What is Positive Reinforcement Through Conditioned Inhibition of Fear or Conditioned Safety Signals?

A

response feedback stimuli may acquire conditioned inhibitory properties and become signals for the absence of aversive stimulation. Such stimuli are called safety signals.

According to the safety-signal hypothesis, the safety signals that accompany avoidance responses may provide positive reinforcement for avoidance behavior

17
Q

Alternative Theoretical Accounts of Avoidance Behavior

What is Reinforcement of Avoidance Through Reduction of Shock Frequency?

A

the shock-frequency reduction hypothesis views the reduction of shocks to be critical to the reinforcement of avoidance behavior.

However, several experiments have shown that animals can learn to make an avoidance response even if the response does not reduce the frequency of shocks delivered
This evidence suggests that shock-frequency reduction is not necessary for avoidance learning

18
Q

Alternative Theoretical Accounts of Avoidance Behavior

What are Avoidance and Species-Specific Defense Reactions?

A

Bolles assumed that aversive stimuli and situations elicit strong unconditioned, or innate, responses

the configuration of the environment determines which particular SSDR occurs

A major prediction of the SSDR theory is that instrumental responses similar to SSDRs will be learned more easily in avoidance experiments than responses that are unrelated to SSDRs

19
Q

Alternative Theoretical Accounts of Avoidance Behavior

What is Predatory Imminence and Defensive and Recuperative Behaviors?

A

According to the predatory imminence continuum, different defensive responses occur depending on the level of danger faced by an animal

assumes that defensive behavior initially occurs as unconditioned responding

20
Q

Alternative Theoretical Accounts of Avoidance Behavior

What is the Expectancy Theory of Avoidance?

A

encounters with aversive events trigger a conscious process of threat appraisal that generates expectations of future threat (or lack of threat) based on cues and responses

treats the cognitive expectancies that these generate as the primary cause of avoidance behavior

21
Q

What are some Aversive Stimuli for humans?

A

Time out - removal of the opportunity to obtain positive reinforcement

Overcorrection

A convenient aversive stimulus in human studies of punishment is point loss

22
Q

What are some characteristics of aversive stimulus that influence the effectiveness of punishment?

A

Low-intensity vs high-intensity punishment
High-intensity from onset vs later
Response-Contingent Versus Response-Independent Aversive Stimulation
Availability of Alternative Reinforced Responses
Effects of a Discriminative Stimulus for Punishment
Punishment as a Signal for the Availability of Positive Reinforcement

23
Q

How does onset of high-intensity punishment affect suppression of behaviour?

A

If a high intensity of shock is used from the outset of punishment, the instrumental response will be severely suppressed. However, if the high-intensity punishment is reached only after a gradual increase, much less suppression of behavior will occur

24
Q

What are the Effects of Schedules of Positive Reinforcement during punishment, using sucrose or cocaine with rats?

A

Sucrose seeking was suppressed by punishment whether the rats received moderate or extended training. None of the sucrose rats showed evidence of being so addicted to sucrose that they became resistant to punishment. Only cocaine produced that result.

25
Q

What are some Theories of Punishment?

A

The Conditioned Emotional Response Theory of Punishment
The Avoidance Theory of Punishment
Punishment and the Negative Law of Effect

26
Q

Theories of Punishment

What is The Conditioned Emotional Response Theory of Punishment?

A

Conditioned suppression involves a suppression of ongoing behavior elicited by a stimulus that has been associated with aversive stimulation. The behavioral suppression occurs primarily because a fear-conditioned stimulus elicits freezing, which then interferes with other activities.

27
Q

Theories of Punishment

What is The Avoidance Theory of Punishment?

A

organisms learn to escape from the conditioned aversive stimuli related to the punished response by engaging in some other behavior that is incompatible with the punished activity

avoidance theory of punishment has been controversial

28
Q

Theories of Punishment

What is the Negative Law of Effect?

A

Thorndike (1911) originally proposed that positive reinforcement and punishment involve symmetrically opposite processes

In later years, Thorndike abandoned the idea that punishment weakens behavior (Thorndike, 1932), but the belief that there is a negative Law of Effect that is comparable but opposite of a positive Law of Effect has remained with us