Lecture 11 Flashcards

1
Q

Belbin’s Team Roles

A
  1. Thinking: plant, monitor-evaluator, specialist
  2. People: coordinator, team-worker, resource investigator
  3. Actions: shaper, implementer, completer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Selection and Valuation of Venture Financing

A

A typical investment decision involves initial screening, information gathering, the assessment of risk, and the evaluation of target entrepreneurial companies.

  • VC investments are characterized by high risk duo to illiquidity. volatile returns and lack of information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How to get better at selecting venture? (Yang, Narayanan & Zahra, 2009)

A
  • Experience
  • Diversity (stage diversity and innovation, industry diversity and IPO)
  • Uncertainty negates some of these effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Dilemma of Autonomy versus Coordination (Puranam, Singh & Zollo, 2006)

A

Autonomy
- Freedom to experiment and innovate
- Not bound by bureaucratic corporate culture
- Prevents corporate employees from impeding the developing of competing technologies

Coordination
- Start-up may use corporate’s knowledge, experience, and capabilities
- Benefits the corporate: the firm can only learn when knowledge is exchanged
- Not only more knowledge exchanged, but also makes sure this ends up in the right place (business units)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Corporate Venturing) Portfolio thinking

A
  • Includes multiple ties with different ventures
  • The success of failure of a single venture is not important to the incumbent firm, but the corporation is able to achieve its goals related to the entire corporate venturing portfolio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Portfolio diversity

A

The average extent to which ventures in an investor’s corporate venturing portfolio are dissimilar from other ventures within the portfolio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Typical investment decision

A

Involves initial screening, information gathering, the assessment of risk, and the evaluation of target entrepreneurial companies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The case for autonomy

A
  1. Freedom to experiment and innovate
  2. Not bound by bureaucratic corporate culture
  3. Prevents corporate employees from impeding the developing of competing technologies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The case for coordination

A
  1. Start-up may use corporate’s knowledge, experience, and capabilities
  2. Benefits the corporate: the firm can only learn when knowledge is exchanged
  3. Not only more knowledge exchanged but also makes sure this ends up in the right place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Funding: seed stage

A

Investments that require funding for product development and team expansion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Funding: scaling stage

A

Investments that require funding primarily to scale-up their business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Swimming with sharks dilemma

A

The choice for a young firm/start-up between a dangerous partner with attractive resources, or a safer but less attractive partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Diversity on Innovation Performance

A

Wadhwa, Phelps & Kotha (2016)

Diversity had an inverted U-shaped effect on Innovation performance
> New-knowledge versus the complexity of integrating new knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Diversity on Financial performance

A

Yang, Narayanan & De Carolus (2014)

Diversity has a U-shaped relationship with Financial Performance
> Risk reduction benefits versus Redeployment of resources and relevant experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can corporate ventures outperform others?

A

Park and Steensma (2013)
- CVCs tend to elect more innovative ventures, and then nurture them specifically towards higher innovative performance (especially when the investor has more of a say in the investment syndicate

Baum and Silverman (2004); Chemmanur et al. (2011); Sorenson (2007)
- (C)VCs can thus act as both a ‘scout’ and a ‘coach’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nature vs Nurture venturing

A

Nature: selecting the right ventures pre-investment
Nurture: developing and growing the venture post-investment

17
Q

Is nature or nurture more important in predicting the success of a venture?

A

Bertoni, D’Adda & Grilli (2016)
- Europe (more sparsely populated VC-areas): best start-ups may skip VC funding altogether (so the other way around: VCs actually pick startups in need for help).
- More experienced VCs: outperform when it comes to both selecting and nurturing, where selecting has double the impact on IPO of the start up

18
Q

Real Options Theory

A

An initial CVC Investment gives the option to acquire the company when It successfully develops

19
Q

Misappropriation (Anton & Yao, 1994; Knoben & Bakker, 2018)

A
  1. A start-up having a valuable asset
  2. The start-up forming a tie with an incumbent to commercialize this asset
  3. The incumbent having the ability to utilize this asset without relying on the start-up
20
Q

How to avoid misappropriation

A
  1. Intellectual Property Protection (IPP)
  2. Secrecy and Timing: do not disclose information until a later stage
  3. Social Defenses: bring along a third party chaperone.