Lecture 1 Science, Politics, Ethics (Ch1) Flashcards
what is philosophical ethics?
- putting aside what you hear from political pundits and commentators on Fox News or the Daily show
- suspend your assumptions and what you think you already know
- think carefully in as unbiased and balanced as you can
- critically evaluating, looking at decision making itself, how we justify or defend our decisions
- examining evidence, perspectives, and logical arguments from a variety of sources
science and ethics: asks questions of responsibility
ex: should burden lie with those making a change or those arguing against it?
refer to page 9:
science and ethics: how is science biased, according to Dejardin?
- no approach is perfect, arguing against blind trust in anything
ex: technology cannot fix all - environmental issues span many disciplines, so over reliance on any single discipline is problematic
- problems occur when multi-faceted decisions evaluate only the quantifiable elements
ex: Lovins “answers you get depend on the questions you ask” - the questions are driven by funding
- philosophy/ethics will not provide answers on their own
science and ethics: what is the scientific approach, what does science try to do?
highlight the problem of reductionism, which exists even when science does accomplish its aims
ex: applications to ecosystems, which are complex and irreducible
Thrasymachus and ethical (moral) relativism
Differences in moral judgments across different people and cultures
Descriptive: some people disagree about what is moral
Meta-ethical: nobody is objectively right or wrong
Normative: because nobody is right or wrong, we tolerate the behavior of others even when we disagree
What is the anthropocentric theoretical approach?
only humans have moral standing
but to which humans does this extend? fetuses, future generations?
What is the non-anthropocentric theoretical approach?
includes non-human animals, plants, non-living things (natural objects), larger systems and ecosystems