Lecture 1 - Evidence and Judgement Flashcards

1
Q

(lecture):

What is the basic process of how we make decisions?

Give an example of how this process can be demonstrated.

A

(lecture):

We gather evidence to make a judgement which then leads to a decision.

Evidence - The information we have from the world that we get through our senses
Judgement - What is the quality of this information? What would it lead me to believe
Decision - The decision made from these judgements.

(See page 1 in my G doc lecture notes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(lecture):

Read:

Everything involves judgement based on evidence…
… whether we’re aware we’re doing it or not!

Distinction between hypothetical state of the world and the evidence you have about it
> We don’t have direct access to the “real world”!
Evidence is probabilistic
> i.e., nothing is absolutely certain to us

Reliability/relevance: Some sources/types of evidence more/less reliable or informative than others

Base rates: Some things, events, outcomes, etc. more/less likely than others. Some things are so common that we discount it.

Utility: Some outcomes are more consequential than others. How important or consequential a decision is is critical to that decision. If a consequence of a decision is large, we might avoid it.

Adaptive/rational process should weigh and integrate various sources of evidence to arrive at optimum judgement to base decision on.

A

(lecture):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(lecture):

How good are we at weighing up evidence to make decisions?

Describe (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) study that investigates this.

Describe base rate fallacy.

Describe conjunction fallacy.

A

(lecture):

See page 2 + 3 of my G doc lecture notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(lecture):

Define the representativeness heuristic.

A

(lecture):

“Representativeness Heuristic”: Judging the likelihood that a particular instance comes from a particular category of things or events based on how representative it is of that category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(lecture):

Read blue writing on page 4 of G doc notes.

A

(lecture):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(lecture):

How do we judge how likely something is to occur?
How common is something? How likely is a particular event?

A

(lecture):

See page 4 of my G doc lecture notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lecture Summary:

Appropriate judgements have to be based on evidence

People seem to deal with evidence in a way that leads to biases/fallacies
> Base rate neglect
> Conjunction fallacy
> Over- and under-estimation of frequencies of events

Suggestion that people don’t weigh up evidence, but rather use “heuristics” to make judgements
> Representativeness
> Availability

These seem to lead to irrational behaviour (or at least they seem to distort judgments)
> i.e., judgments aren’t based on sound appraisal of all available evidence

A

Lecture Summary:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly