Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Cultural psychology > Lecture 1 > Flashcards

Lecture 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

What is culture? -> Edward Burnett Tylor (anthropologist, 1871)

A

that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society

-> multitude of things
-> sth acquired and shared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is culture? -> Geert Hofstede (Dutch psychologist, 2001)

A

the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group of people from another

-> programming = sth acquired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is culture? -> Steven J.Heine (2008)

A

> any kind of information (ideas, beliefs, technology, habit, practice) that is acquired from other members of one’s species through social learning that is capable of affecting an individual’s behaviors

> Particular group of people living within shared context and exposed to same cultural information example: “Western” vs “East Asian” cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is culture? -> Alex Mesoudi (2015)

A

socially transmitted information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cultural psychology approach

A

not only interested in observable habits, artifacts, behavior or institutions

interested in driving underneath forces (= latent processes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is NOT culture?

A

-> only cultural values
-> only nation (often used as cultural proxy)
-> homogenous/inwariant within group (people can reject dominant cultural values)
-> stable (it constantly evolves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How unstable are cultural values?

A

-> matrix:
1) survival values - self-expression values
2) traditional values - secular rational values

there is prominent change over time!
however, there is also some stability -> cultures are moving but they don’t change into complete opposites (as cultures are build on what happened before)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

goals of general psychology

A

psychological processes = invariant, universal

differences are superficial = noise

mind independent from culture (mind as computer)

goal: to understand the mind independent of content and context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

goals of cultural psychology

A

psychological processes shaped by culture

differences = real and affect deep structure

mind interwined with culture

goal: to understand how the mind is inter-dependent with its content and context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How deep is effect of culture? absolute task vs relative task

A

Figure-line task

There are 2 tasks:
1. absolute task: in another smaller square → reproduce the line they saw in a big square (big square is gone - memory based)

  1. relative task: shrink the square and replicate the proportions (relative size)

challenging tasks = involves more attentional control
(left inferior parietal lobule + right inferior precentral gyrus activated)

findings:
- absolute task: more challenging (=required more attentional control) for East Asians
- relative task: more challenging for Americans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why absolute task is harder for East Asians, but relative task is harder for Americans?

A

One possible explanation:
East Asians - holistic way of thinking - word as a whole - how elements are related to each other?

Americans - more analytical way of thinking - focus on taking information out of context -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What illustrates Muller-Lyer illusion? Why American undergraduates are most susceptible to it?

A

if you move away from Western cultrues, industrialized, educated etc. → illusion is not as strong (almost not present)

one possible explanation -> carpenter corner

reflex angle (kąt wklęsły) seems to have loner lines than oblique angle (kąt wypukły)

when you are growing in environment withut these angles (lines) - neural networks weren’t trained to perceive those lines in 3D space context

also Americans respond more extremely than other Westerners!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How sth can be both universal and culture-dependent?

A

universal - language use - consonents and vowels -> culture dependent - specific ways of speaking

universal - incest disgust -> culture dependent - variation in what is considered incest (for example dependent on clan membership)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are levels of universality?

A

1) existential universal
2) functional universal
3) accessibility universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is specific cognitive tool available across cultures?

A

NO
then it points into cultural invention such as (abacus)

then it is nonuniversal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

existential universal

A

-> specific cognitive tool available ACROSS cultures
however, it doesn’t do the same thing!

for example: instrinsic vs extrinsic motivation

after failure, Americans get demotivated, but East Asians experience increase in instrinsic motivations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

functional univeral

A

-> specific cognitive tool available ACROSS cultures AND is used to solve the
same problems across cultures

HOWEVER, it is more accessible in some cultures than in others

example would be costly punishment after breaking social rules

people differ across cultures in how much cost they are willing to pay to punish sb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are conditions for accessibly universal?

A

-> specific cognitive tool available ACROSS cultures AND is used to solve the
same problems across cultures AND is accessible to the same degree across cultures

mostly psychological processes that emerge in early infancy
example: social faciliation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is most prominent characteristic of psychological research sample?

A

Western
Educated
Industrialized
Rich
Democratic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

color-blind (culture-blind) approach

A

idea that people can interact without giving much attention to one’s cultural background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

multicultural approach

A

focus on respecting group differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How to study cultural variation?

A

1) pick different cultures
2) look at differences in variable you are interested in

which aspect of culture can explain that difference?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are characteristics of cultural values?

A

preferences for one state of affairs over another
distinguishes countries NOT individuals
more of continuum, than exclusive categories!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Geert Hoftstede - cultural values

A

1) individualism/collectivism
2) power distance
3) uncertainty/avoidance
4) masculinity/feminity
5) long-term/short-term
6) indulgence/restraint

25
Q

Michele Gelfand - cultural values

A

tightness/looseness
tolerance of deviant behavior and severity of punishment to norm violators

26
Q

are individualism/collectivism and tightness/looseness the same?

A

NO!
they are moderately correlated -> example: Norway individualistic + tight, Sweden rather loose but equally individualistic

27
Q

what are methodological issues in cross-cultural research?

A

COSI concerns
C -> causation
O -> operationalization
S -> sampling
I -> interpretation

28
Q

Causation concern

A

how do I design my study + what conclusions can I draw?

29
Q

Operationalization concern

A

how do I measure my variables + how do I construct my material?

30
Q

sampling concern

A

which cultures should I study?

31
Q

Interpretation concern

A

what do my data tell me?

32
Q

Sampling approaches

A

1) testing for universality
2) testing for cultural variance

33
Q

testing for universality (not that common in cultural psychology)

A

Is sth an universal phenomenon that exists across cultures?

option 1: randomly select as many countries as possible (great approach but often not an option)

option 2: select maximally different cultures - if there is no difference = good evidence for universality
however what if you find a difference? you don’t know what caused it…

34
Q

testing for cultural variation

A

option 1: randomly select as many countries as possible (ideal but often not realistic)

option 2: just minimal difference approach: match two cultural groups in all non-cultural variables (age, SES, gender, education) so that the only difference is cultural value of interest (such as collectivism)

downside: culture is not manipulated - so you don’t get definite answers; in many cases you just compare students in EIRD contexts -> can you really generalize then?

35
Q

Operationalization concerns

A

main objective: ensure all study materials are equivalent across cultural groups

1) construct equivalence
2) methodological equivalence (equity in familiarity with stimulus and response procedure)
3) linguistic equivalence (translation accuracy, retention of connotations)

36
Q

construct equivalence

A

how do you measure happiness?

if you ask participants: “How proud are you about your achievements in life?” you implicitly assume that all people feel happy when they achieve sth personally (but for many people group achievements are more prominent)

is the meaning of happiness the same acrorss cultures?

37
Q

methodological equivalence

A

participants must understand questions/situations in the same way

example: burglar breaking in (but there is a difference in how windows open in America vs India - so participants approach situation differently)

38
Q

linguistic equivalence

A

how to deal with language differences?

-> translation
problem: untranslatable words/cultural-specifics

solutions
1) back translation
you translate the questionnaire from your language to the other; then other person translates their questionnaire from their language to your language = you can notice if items are the same or different

2) bilingual investigators/collaborators (ideal)
3) avoid very short/vague items (with non transatable words)

39
Q

How to ensure bias-free result interpretation?

A

Consider following cultural differences in response styles:
1) moderacy + extremity bias
2) acquiescence bias (=agreement bias)
3) reference-group effect

40
Q

moderacy and extremity bias

A

East Asians show moderacy bias (choosing answers in the middle)

Hispanic and African-American show extremity bias (chosing extreme answers)

41
Q

what are solutions for moderacy/extremity bias?

A

1) avoid scales with middle response option (however, it doesnt account for extremity)
2) yes/no format (reduced variance of responses)
3) standardize the scores! -> it alters the data, so it is only useful for comparison patterns

42
Q

What are cons vs pros of standardization of respones?

A

Standardization involves taking participant mean and looking at test results by comparing them to this mean (difference relative to the mean)

However, major drawback is that there is underlying assumption that average level of response is identical across cultures - problematic if you look at patterns of responses across broad array of measures!

It is fine to assume everyone has the same amount of personality
However, when you have 10-item measure of talkativeness → standardization forces each person to have the same level of talkativeness

43
Q

Acquiescence bias

A

agreement bias - participants tend to agree more (prominent in East Asians)

44
Q

how to overcome acquiescence bias?

A

1) use 50% reverse-scored items
2) standardize scores
3) avoid general items, specify contexts

45
Q

reference group effect

A

comparison to most other people around us

example: -
- “I am helpful” compared to all the people I know? → in collectivistic cultures, people are more helpful in general, so participant may score themselves lower

46
Q

How to account for reference group effect?

A

1) use concrete scenarios; 2) use concrete response choices to concrete scenario; 3) avoid quantifiers (very); 4) use behavioral or physiological measures (not self-reports)

47
Q

How to account for causation?

A

culture cannot be manipulated -> you can always implement quasi-experiments tho!

48
Q

methods used in cultural psychology

A

1) survey
2) field experiement
3) neuroscience methods
4) situation sampling
5) cultural products
6) cultural priming

49
Q

survey

A

Pros
- economic
- easy to sample a lot of participants
- some equivalence issues can be overcomed by looking at patterns of means across groups

Cons
- bias prone due to self-report
- without experimental manipulation, no causal claim possible

50
Q

field experiment

A

Pros
- high ecological validity (real world vs lab)

Cons
- extraneous variables that cannot be controlled (weather, strikes)

such as study where they send job applications of ex convicts (some convicts were sentenced due to crime of honor) to check if they will be treated differentially in Southern vs Nouthern USA regions

51
Q

neuroscience methods

A

PROS
-understand neurological/genetical underpinnings of cultural differences
- scan brain activity/EEG - understand how different tasks come with different brain activations
- allows to draw conclusions about biological bases of cultural variation

CONS
- expensive + time intensive, usually, small samples (power issues)
-emerging field - not always clear what differences in one gene polymorphism mean

52
Q

what 3 methods are particularly close to manipulating culture?

A

1) situation sampling
2) cultural products
3) cultural priming

53
Q

situation sampling

A
  • in different cultures, people encounter different types of situations
  • these culturally shaped situations lead us to adopt habitual ways of thinking about ourselves and our world

1) Participants from different culturs describe situations of a certain type (example: high self esteem)
2) Participants from both cultures indicate how they respond to selection of situations from both cultures

2 types of effects investigated:

1) situation effect -> Do situation from one culture lead to different responses than those from other cultures?

2) participant effect -> Do participants from one culture respond differentially than those from the other culture?

54
Q

evaluation of situation sampling

A

PROS
sheds light on the process of how culture (in the world) affects people (in the head) → causal inferences

CONS
time intensive multi-step research
difficult to know what to leave in situation descriptions (what is necessary to understand them) and what to remove (cultural specifics)

55
Q

cultural products

A

looking at cultural artifacts
1) specify hypothesis for example about children books
2) focus on most relevant products -> most popular books
3) code data -> for presence of psychological constructs of interest (for example how is affect expressed in children books?)

56
Q

cultural products - evaluation

A

PROS
- cultural products reflect the most prevalent cultural ideals/messages that members of culture produce and are exposed to
- data are already available - only need to be coded

CONS
-mostly requires trained coders (time and resource intensive, subjectivity)
- limited scope - ideally supplemented with evidence for the effect of exposure to cultural products

57
Q

cultural priming

A

closest to causal manipulations
1) activation of cultural ideas -> for example circle certain words, show flags of different countries etc.
2) thinking or acting in culturally distinctive ways

58
Q

cultural priming - evaluation

A

PROS
- within-group design of priming studies is not affected by equivalence issues
- allows causal inference about effect of cultural mindsets (proxy for culture)

CONS
- culture is chronic and sustained by environment, cultural mindset is temporary
- not all cultural ideas are accessible across cultures

Cultural psychology (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions